2007 - 2022

Osborne’s Toxic Legacy

cam19_84_1630035iWhen you hear the word ‘deficit’ the first thing that springs to mind is the so called ‘budget deficit’. So called, because many of us are ‘deficit deniers’. A deficit denier is someone who asserts that the austerity cuts are not the solution. In other words there is a choice involved in relation to how one might deal with the economic crisis.

The budget deficit is really used as propaganda to give the Tories an alibi for what they always want to do. They want to destroy welfare in favour of privatisation, and they do this by undermining and seeking to remove the capacity of working people to organise effectively. Make no mistake, they really do think austerity is necessary, but the attacks are a combination of both structural economic pressures and seizing the opportunity to privatise and roll back the welfare state.

Back in 2010 George Osborne said, “Both those who deny the need to cut the deficit and those who refuse to say how to do it are placing themselves outside of the domestic and international debate.” To understand what Osborne means in reality replace the word ‘deficit’ with ‘welfare state’. Of course the austerity measures only impact ordinary people. The richest 200 people in Britain have a combined wealth of over £318 Billion. Importantly, that is an eight fold increase since 1989. The rich are not only getting richer; they are getting super-richer. But, as the neoliberal might say, maybe these people just work really hard? Well lets just say that it would take 200 people on the wage of an average skilled worker around 63 and a half million years (without spending a penny) to amass such wealth.

To put this figure into perspective, it is billions more than Britain’s deficit when it was at its height in 2009 of just over £156 Billion. Now these 200 individuals combined own around three times the figure of the current deficit. Something is deeply wrong – and Vodafone and the rest of the tax dodgers haven’t even been mentioned yet.

And curiously, the right-wing press will have you believe that it is benefit ‘scroungers’ that cause the rest of society to suffer. A TUC survey carried out in 2012 found that on average people thought that 41% of the entire welfare budget went towards the unemployed. The actual figure? It’s 3%. Additionally, the average figure people put for fraudulently claimed benefits was 27%. The real figure is 0.3%. But don’t let truth and facts get in the way of policy.

Put all of this context with the bedroom tax. According to Tory wisdom the need to cut the deficit is so great and the poorest have been taking too much for too long that this most draconian of policies must be push through and defended. It means that 660,000 houses in the UK, 100,000 of them in Scotland, will lose £14 a week. Those with two ‘extra’ rooms must withstand a 25% cut in housing benefit. The result is evictions, poverty and homelessness. Crisis figures show a 30% increase in homelessness this winter. They say homelessness is to rise dramatically. Chief executive of the national housing federation Leslie Morphy has said: “Our poorest households face a bleak April as they struggle to budget for all these cuts coming at once. People are already cutting back on the essentials of food and heating but there is only so much they can do.’

Queue food banks. In Britain in 2013, thousands of people are struggling to fight hunger. Even basic human rights cannot be afforded under this austerity union. Let the facts speak for themselves. The Trussel Trust figures show in 2011-12 food banks fed 128,687 people nationwide, in 2012-13 they anticipate this number will rise to over 290,000. Just as the rich are getting super rich, the ranks of those who cant afford even to eat are swelling. For Cameron of course, this just proves his ‘big society’ – people helping out the community in ‘economic hard times’.

So Osborne and the Tories are essentially doing the following: he is telling us we have an unmanageable deficit, which he makes working people pay for while the wealth of the rich grows exponentially, and to keep us blind from the ideological and unjust nature of his austerity package, he offers up the real enemy for us to focus on: the benefit scrounger and the ‘skiver’. Now he claims ‘economic recovery’ in a 0.3% growth in GDP. What absolute rot.

This is not just a rotten economic policy, this is also about democracy. The economy and our political institutions are inextricably linked. So here are some simple questions about democracy: when were we consulted about any of this? Where did the Tories get such a mandate? They couldn’t even win a majority government. And who can say with a straight face that those who voted Lib Dem are having their views represented. How dare Osborne come here and preach to us his economic poison? They have zero mandate here. Is it not stomach turning that we, in Scotland, who want nothing to do with the Tories policy, have our own parliament but don’t have the powers necessary to do anything but attempt to shield our population from the millionaires in that cabinet down in Westminster?

Something has got to change – and fast. Voting Yes in the referendum sends a message that we reject Osborne’s toxic formula. I believe that as this argument develops many in the trade union and labour movement will join the call for a Yes vote. That will require patient and long discussion. Class is fundamental in the debate. But to those in the Labour party who say that this independence movement is based on a narrow nationalism, you do your traditional support a disservice, and only highlight your own dislocation from the struggle that is about life and death for a growing number of people. We can stand united against austerity across borders, and start to rebuild an economy based on real jobs and investment in people and our communities. Lets take the argument forward confidently, and let the facts speak for himself. Osborne has failed, we should not let that failure ruin our lives.

Comments (0)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Charles Patrick O'Brien says:

    Aye a very good blog,and it is looking like the privileged (aristocracy in their own eyes) have not remembered the reason for the French Revolution! that is why help was first started for the poor and the sick to preserve those with wealth that they might retain it.

  2. Ian Smart says:

    Mundane counter point. Nearly twice as many people in Scotland voted for the Coalition Parties than voted for the SNP at the 2010 General Election That’s probably why on 27th March the Scottish Government voted in the Scottish Parliament to implement the Bedroom Tax in Scotland. They know their supporters.

    1. Peter A Bell says:

      Britnats don’t like it when they’re beaten by their own rules.

    2. Peter A Bell says:

      One might find the more rabid Britnats a little easier to thole if they didn’t so arrogantly assume that others are as stupid as themselves. The reality is that the Scottish Parliament has no powers to stop the bedroom tax. The parliament lacks those powers mainly because British Labour sought to ensure that it would never be able to seriously challenge a Tory government at Westminster.

      It was never supposed to be a real parliament. Scotland was never supposed to have a real government. It’s all got away from British Labour now because the people of Scotland saw through the ruse. And rabid Britnats like Ian Smart will never be able to come to terms with that.

    3. RevStu says:

      I’m curious what UK Government election results have to do with what the Scottish Government does.

    4. Mundane? Aye.

      Counter point (sic)? Naw.

    5. Eva Comrie says:

      Silly point to try to make – local authorities have the ability to help those struck by the Bedroom Tax so the real question Ian is why Labour controlled authorities seem reluctant so to do?

  3. Jonathon –

    Thanks for some solid facts.

    Here’s another. According to Richie Venton of the SSP the amount of tax uncollected, evaded and simply unpaid is approx £120 billion.
    (I’m pretty sure I saw a stat the other day which put the entire PSB Requirement at 130-ish billion?)

    That could be used to pay 4.8 million people an ‘average’ salary of 25k pa.

    And that’s before you even consider the savings on benefits and whatever tax these new workers would pay.

    You say: ‘Class is fundamental in the debate.’ – have to say man, I admire your powers of understatement.

    Class IS this debate – that’s what Osborne’s wee visit was all about, and hopefully, via as many sources as possible, he will by now have received the message that his comments were well-noted. He’s welcome to come back and give us more of the same any time he likes, just in case anyone missed what he was really saying.

    1. cynicalHighlander says:

      Cross someone’s palm with silver makes fraud evaporate!

      Revealed: George Osborne’s secret veto on fraud inquiries

      But controversially the Treasury can keep its decisions secret – potentially allowing it to veto politically sensitive fraud inquiries, either before or midway through an investigation, without public scrutiny.

  4. David McCann says:

    @ Ian Smart.
    Another mundane point.
    Should this present government survive for its full term, then for 33 out of the 70 post war years, Scotland has had UK governments it did not vote for. Furthermore, each of the Westminster Governments rejected by Scottish voters since 1970, has been distinctly to the right of Scottish political opinion.
    Are you happy for this democratic deficit to continue?

  5. john king says:

    o/t but just pulled this off the herlads comments on the story about
    2scotland already matches UK even without oil revenues, interesting

    John Macintyre • 13 hours ago −
    It’s good to see this. Of course it would take a while to rebalance and develop our ecomomy but there’s no question that if we work hard and take responsibility for ourselves, we could build a much better society as an independent country than we could ever hope to under the Union.

    could it be? has OBE Wan Kenobi come over to the light and ditched his title?

    1. John Souter says:

      John – I doubt it. The comment referred to is probably fro Dr John MacIntyre, not the OBE.

  6. Juteman says:

    One day, the likes of Ian Smart will wake up and look in the mirror.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.