Scotland and the Black Swan

On Saturday Jim Sillars posted a tribute to Alex Salmond saying “Make Alex’s death a call to unity … Recognise that a divided movement cannot win.”

I think it’s fair to say that’s unlikely.

Despite Jim’s plea some people decided to use the event of a funeral service to shout “Traitor” at John Swinney and his wife, who suffers from MS, as they entered St Giles Cathedral. Despite some attempts to pretend this didn’t happen, or wasn’t uttered by someone from Alba, it clearly was.

Not everyone is trying to pretend this away. Eva Comrie writes: “Working class women & men are perfectly well entitled to call the FM a traitor because he did let down some who elected him and his colleagues ; he voted to remove women’s rights and he promoted SNP 1 and 2 when a vote for ALBA would have delivered Independence. Don’t forget.”

“A vote for Alba would have delivered independence”. Huge if true.

There’s been some discussion below the line about possible ways forward for the independence movement, and the rise (or demise) of Alba – or the ISP – or the New Scotland Party – is part of that discussion.

Politics everywhere is going through huge flux and spasms of change. Scotland is not immune to this. Take a look at what’s happening in Wales where Plaid Cymru is polling ahead of Labour for the first time since 2010, and where new polling also puts Reform level with Welsh Labour. In Ireland Mary Lou Macdonald’s Sinn Féin is topping the polls.

This volatility, and surges of populism is a global phenomenon – a response, in part, to the failure of liberal democracies to create credible solutions to the enduring problems of late capitalism. Scotland is not immune to this, and the consequences could go either way. Polling suggests for example that Reform UK could make inroads even here, where they have no base, where few of their core policies have any real support, and where they have no electoral record.

This is because the Conservative Party has collapsed under the weight of their own incompetence and because the racist and anti-immigration rhetoric of Reform plays well everywhere that simplistic scapegoats are required for social problems. Reform don’t need any real presence here, their leader is a permanent fixture in the broadcast media.

The Left in Scotland will need to organise against Reform to combat the propaganda that spills from them. The biggest con perpetrated by Farage and his ilk, is to convince ordinary people that the threat to our livelihoods comes from people fleeing warzones and not the elite that he himself represents.

So where could this volatility lead to?

Polling evidence suggests that Labour in Scotland could increase their MSPs by ten seats, from 22 to 32, that the Scottish Greens could pick up a couple more MSPs and that the Scottish Conservatives would essentially haemorrhage votes to Reform UK losing half their seats. The same polling suggests the SNP would lose 18 seats but still remain the largest party.

[polling data courtesy of Mark McGeoghegan (@markmcgeoghegan.bsky.social) — Bluesky]

The same polling models suggest that the Alba Party might peak at 2.3%. Perhaps, for all the calls of unity Alba should join forces with the ISP and the New Scotland Party to improve their electoral chances?

If you look at the red line for Labour in the lower graph you can see a downwards trajectory, and I think its safe to say that Keir Starmer’s ‘honeymoon’ – if it existed at all – is well and truly over.  Anas Sarwar’s ridiculous posturing over the Winter Fuel Payment’s was brutally exposed (‘Forgetful Politicians‘), and Scottish Labour are really struggling to establish themselves as distinct or separate from UK Labour. Starmer’s indefensible position on the situation in Gaza will also lead to a decline in support for Labour.

Labour’s collapse in Wales may be a portent of things to come here.

If such results were to come into being it would be a greatly undermined SNP, but it would also mean that a Lib-Lab coalition would not have sufficient numbers to form a government, unless they formed a Unionist bloc with the Conservatives.

Such a result would mean that the only path to power for the SNP would be through some kind of electoral pact with the Scottish Greens, who are still hurting from the dissolution of the Bute House Agreement. These numbers would also mean the emergence for the first time of a hard-right presence in the projected 14 Reform UK MSPs dwarfing even an inconsequential Liberal Democrat party under the unfortunate leadership of Alex Cole Hamilton. A collapse of the Scottish Conservative losing half their seats would also be a career-ending moment for Russell Findlay.

As usual its worth pointing out the proviso that these are projections and we have no real way of knowing for certain how the political landscape will look in a years time, entering 2026. But we can think of a couple of issues that will affect things. The extent to which the SNP – under Swinney or a new leader – can genuinely re-invent themselves and regain credibility among pro-independence supporters will be key for them. Perhaps also the SNP face a threat from Reform? As Mark McGeoghegan writes in the Herald:

“Reform UK is on the march. Having won 14.3% of the popular vote and five MPs in the July General Election, it is now polling as high as 21% in Britain-wide polling. If a General Election were held tomorrow, it could quadruple its MP tally or better. The next General Election will almost certainly not be held until 2028 or later, but it is set to make significant gains at local and devolved elections in the meantime.

That includes Scotland. Reform UK won 7% of the vote north of the Border in July’s General Election, and despite failing to win any seats had a substantial impact. It won 14.6% in Aberdeenshire North and Moray East, where the SNP defeated then-Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross by a wafer-thin margin of 2.5 points. However, it also won a higher proportion of the vote than the winning party’s majority in an additional 11 seats, four of which were very narrow SNP holds against strong Labour challengers.”

Other questions include: how can Alba survive the demise of their leader? 2026 will either be a breakthrough event or a terminal one. Polls suggests the latter. A poll high-point of 2.3% would be well short of a target of about 5.5% required to get just one MSP elected as laid out here (‘What does it take to get elected in Scotland and Wales?‘).

How can Scottish Labour distance themselves from a right-drifting UK leadership? They cannot, and polling evidence suggests that what Joe Guinan has called “a species of sub-Blairism” will become more and more unpopular the more the public is exposed to their policies and political direction. The debacle of the GB Energy claims, and the reality that energy bills are promised to rise in January 2025 will be a blow to one of their flagship policies.

One thing that hasn’t really been talked about. There is an understandable mood of despair among some sections of the independence movement. And yet, the much anticipated hegemony resulting from a Labour landslide has not, in fact, transpired. Starmer’s government has proved to be a giant Nothing Burger and his slide in the opinion polls is remarkable, particularly for someone who was framed as an electoral success. Second, while the pro-independence parties in Scotland have suffered setbacks, the ascendancy of Plaid Cymru and Sinn Féin too opens separate fronts against the Union.

The defence would previously have been Devolution itself. Indeed writing at the beginning of the year Simon Jenkins wrote (‘Northern Ireland will leave the union, and Scotland could too. True devolution is the only way to save it‘): “The UK is the only western European state whose unity is unstable, except for possibly Spain. Almost half of Northern Irish voters expect to rejoin the rest of Ireland within 20 years, and nearly 60% of Scots want some form of independence. Even in Wales, independence is favoured by almost a third. In all these cases, younger voters are the most eager for a breakup of the UK. This is hardly a trivial matter.”

He finished: “In Northern Ireland, the only long-term future must lie in reunion with the Republic, eased by a Britain that rejoins the European single market …

“Scotland is a different matter. As the UK in 2016 slid so casually out of the EU, so could Scotland slide out of the UK. It should, by size and economic potential, be as rich and independent as Ireland or Denmark. Ireland shook off its reliance on the UK and became a Celtic Tiger. While it might be a pity – and a sad comment on England – Scotland could do the same. The next British government should start by tearing up the Barnett formula and devolving real power – fiscal power – in Scotland. Otherwise we should welcome the future Denmark of the British Isles.”

The problem, for Jenkins, and the Union, is that Labour and the Conservatives have given up on devolution, and Reform are actively hostile to it. The idea that further powers would be devolved to Holyrood as part of a wider constitutional programme as proposed by Gordon Brown, was quietly shelved by Labour as soon as they got into power.

I am hesitant to engage in the “its darkest before the dawn” sort of cliché, but we are living in such times of political volatility that surges of political change that go completely against the grain can’t be ruled out. Black Swan theory was developed by Nassim Nicholas Taleb, starting in 2001, to explain: “the disproportionate role of high-profile, hard-to-predict, and rare events that are beyond the realm of normal expectations.” We live in times of such chaos, breakdown and collapse that the ‘old order’ of political predictions is increasingly difficult to maintain. We cannot rule out a Black Swan event in Scotland in 2026. This may be an obscure notion to cling onto for optimism in mid-winter but it’s all we’ve got right now.

 

Comments (46)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published.

  1. Chris Ballance says:

    I hesitate to point to a facebook post – but Led by Donkeys’ exposure of Farage’s support for economic migrants breaking down borders really deserves wider publicity
    https://www.facebook.com/ledbydonkeys/videos/499958249738066

  2. Claire McNab says:

    Looking at the current state of the independence movement, I am reminded of David Cameron’s devastating 2005 attack on Tony Blair: “He was the future once”.

    That devastating line is part of the Commons knockabout. It’s a cheap blow from the public schoolboy game of trading witty insults which makes Westminster a place of great theatre and awful governance.

    But the problem for the indy movement is that can now be easily cast as having a great future behind it. The unfairness of that labelling doesn’t impede its effectiveness.

    Starmer’s Labour was always a much more shallow and hollow vessel than the Blair/Brown “New Labour” project. It is unsurprising that Starmer got no honeymoon, his low popularity promptly shredded by his failures in Gaza and by his zeal for freezing pensioners and making a targeted push to drive children unto poverty. His quest for freebies drained most of the remaining goodwill.

    It’s unsurprising that ReformUK is making inroads in Scotland. It’s the new kid on the block, just as devolution-delivering Scottish Labour was in 1999, and the SNP was in 2007. Some form of radicalism is highly appealing to the people whose living standards have been in decline since 2020, and right now only the right seem to be offering that radicalism.

    In hindsight, the SNP may have done itself no favours by its victories in 2026 and 2021. The last eight years would have been better spent redefining the independence prospectus rather than pretending that Indyref2 was coming real soon.

    But now the indy movement needs to rebuild without that time in opposition. The movement’s problem is not tactical, and not primarily electoral. Political parties are part of the problem.

    Praying for black swans is a weak, passive strategy. An active strategy would do the hard work of building a credible plan for an independent Scotland. Common Weal has shown some of the right approaches, but is failing because it is marginalised. It is trying too much with limited resources, some problematic personlities, and young talented staff who lack both experience and stature.

    The indy movement needs to build properly resource a big, intensive program of designing the Indy Scotland, run by people with real public stature and staffed by people who have already won their spurs.

    1. I wasn’t really praying for a Black Swan event as noticing that things are so unstable and chaotic that entirely new political events are perfectly possible. I agree with most of your suggestions …

      1. Claire McNab says:

        Sorry Mike. My comment came out in a snippy way I hadn’t intended.
        You are right that at the moment, there is no fair wind on the weather map. My intended target was the various clusters of political leadership who cannot or will not make the weather, and leave people waiting for a black swan.
        It’s time for others to make the weather. Where’s Kenyon Wright when you need him?

    2. John says:

      Claire – this seems a pretty fair assessment of where we are at present.
      I wonder whether the reinvention of independence movement can happen with an SNP led government at Holyrood?
      Incumbent governments are being blamed and punished for voter’s dissatisfaction with state of economy and public services. I wonder whether being out of government after next Holyrood election might actually be advantageous to independence movement in longer term?
      Note to ed – Sinn Fein vote ended up falling in Irish election- Finlan O’Toole has a column in Guardian with background to Irish election.

      1. Thanks John – catching up on that now.

        1. florian albert says:

          Sinn Fein’s share of ‘first preferences’ fell from 24.5% in the 2020 Dail election to 19% in last Friday’s election. This amounts to a loss of about a fifth of voters.
          When there is such anger at the Republic’s many social problems and the failure of Fine Gale-Fianna Fail to deal with them, this is a disastrous showing.

          1. Yeah, my mistake, I saw earlier polling.

          2. All seats now filled in
            #GE24

            Fianna Fáil 48
            Sinn Féin 39
            Fine Gael 38
            Independents 16
            Labour 11
            Social Democrats 11
            Independent Ireland 4
            People Before Profit–Solidarity 3
            Aontú 2
            Green Party 1
            100% Redress 1

            174 (inc. Ceann Comhairle, Seán Ó Fearghaíl (FF) automatically returned)

            Turnout: 59.7%

      2. Claire McNab says:

        John, Sinn Féin is very much a sui genetis project. i feel that few Scots have a good understanding if SFs many faces and and layers.

        SF faces different ways on most issues on the two sides of the border it opposes, and it flipflops between near-socialist radicalism and Fianna Fail-style populist centrism. Some of its stances are rightwing populist. It is an efficient machine, but it lacks internal democracy.

        The left and soft-left parties are very wary of SF, because it is an unreliable ally. I don’t see that it offers any lessons for Scotland, other than a reminder that siloed politics doesn’t play out well on either side of the North Channel. For the mutual follies of the SNP-SGP falling out, find a good parallel in SF’s disdainful treatment of the parties who itvwill need as allies if it ever wants to form a govt

    3. Alec Lomax says:

      The big drawback with Common Weal is Robin McAlpine’s constant firing.

      1. Alec Lomax says:

        Girning.

  3. m. says:

    what are the scottish parliament doing on land reform, why aren’t they getting the ministry of attack, plantation ownrs, & slave driving bizniz ownrs wie shocking human rights records when it comes tae health & safety & abuse ov employees telt in nay uncertain terms

  4. Dougie Blackwood says:

    The infighting among the Indy supporters is a running sore that will prevent any meaningful progress toward Independence so long as it lasts. Finger pointing, recriminations and sniping attacks help nobody.

    We need to consider what we can do in a positive way to achieve what we want. In my view we need a concerted effort to maximise the numbers of Indy supporters in Holyrood, regardless of party label. We need to game the system with that aim in mind and the policy of both votes SNP is not sensible as it gifts seats to our opponents.

    Alba started out with the right idea, not standing for constituencies, only on the list. Now we are faced with 3 or 4 teans splitting that vote. Heads need to be knocked together to sort out the logjam. SNP need to be the single Indy party standing in constituencies and they need to lay off the list vote. After that we need one team standing for the list. Only in this way is there any chance of getting enough bums on seats to be able to DEMAND action.

    1. Given this proposal which single Indy party – Alba, the ISP or the New Scotland Party would you choose to stand on the list (none of these parties has won a single seat and is highly unlikely to win 5% which is the threshold?).

      1. Dougie Blackwood says:

        I would have thought Alba, prior to Alex Salmond’s death but we lack charismatic leadership in all of our Indy parties, including the SNP. This is our real problem. Are there clever politicians with the nous to take us forward yet to come forward.
        Unfortunately the SNP will not support anyone who does not follow the existing line and with their vetting, have shut out good people who might have gone on to take us forward.

        1. You’d have thought Alba, who haven’t won a single seat they stood in and have regularly received 0.5% of the vote. Great shout. By the way vetting is a good thing.

      2. Jimmock says:

        The smaller parties have to shelve their differences and stand as the Independence Alliance. However, this strategy for survival requires the co-operation of the SNP.

        1. Hi Jimmock, again why would an alliance of parties with virtually no political support make a difference to anything? & Why would the SNP cooperate with this?

          1. Jimmock says:

            Ed., see my reply to Tom. The SNP cannot form a majority on present polling without support from other parties. That is how the Scottish parliament works. My plan would, of course, only work if the SNP encouraged their supporters to give their list vote to the Independence Alliance.

          2. Hi Jimmock – thanks. Yeah the SNP have been struggling. Can you explain why combining the three tiny other parties would make a difference? Maybe we’re looking at different polls but these parties receive tiny levels of support. I’m confused.

          3. Dougie Blackwood says:

            The other smaller parties are so small because the SNP keep trumpeting “Both Votes SNP” despite the absolute fact that almost every second vote for the SNP is wasted. SNP 1 and an alliance vote 2 will provide an absolute Indy majority in Holyrood but only if the SNP don’t tell the supporters to waste their vote on the lost cause of SNP list votes.

            I fear that all too many people neither know nor understand how our voting system works.

          4. I think they are so small for other reasons Dougie and I don’t quite believe there would be an avalanche of support for them from other voters. I just don’t think this is credible. I might be wrong.

    2. Tom Crozier says:

      The list vote is the most important especially if there is no guarantee that the SNP will win most constituencies in any region. Voting SNP 1&2 is absolutely essential. Voting any other way is simply increasing fragmention

      1. Dougie Blackwood says:

        There is no hope if we do not win more than half of the constituencies. With every constituency win we reduce the chances of list seats. We didn’t do very well last time yet, in the West Dunbartonshire area where I live, the only Indy supporting rep I have is the Green MSP. Jackie Baillie won the seat and the list seats went to Labour, Tory and 1 Green.

      2. John says:

        The recent General Election highlighted how vulnerable the SNP are in constituencies at the present time.
        The current polling shows that Labour support falling so predicting constituency results very difficult. Does this not also make gaming the list vote difficult too?

      3. Jimmock says:

        Tom, may I respectfully disagree with you on SNP 1&2. The system Is designed to stop any single party obtaining a majority. Unless you expect the SNP to do really badly in the constituency vote, it’s vital to vote for a different independence supporting party on the list. Remember the divisor system reduces the effective list vote by the number of constituency seats plus one. That is, a party winning four constituency seats has their list vote divided by five. Unless they obtain more than 35% of the list vote they are unlikely to win any list seats.

  5. Edward Andrews says:

    Where do you get that Sinn Fein are leading the polls in the Republic of Ireland? according to The Irish Times the position is “Fianna Fáil will have the most seats (48), followed by Sinn Féin (39) and Fine Gael (38)”. The vote for Sinn Fein actually fell by 5.5%
    Remember that the Shinners are very strong on propaganda, and very bad on delivery.

    1. As I said earlier – my mistake, I saw earlier polling.

  6. mark says:

    Gitn wholly fed up ae this debate which not only seems not tae huv progressed an inch forward since 1994 & is so blatantly bourgeois & ironically inuff ay composed in RP English so that it remains at least transparent I suppose tae the attentive inuff reader, but why tak fur granted the grossly phantastical notion that scotland & scottish people living in scotland are some saintly creed above the rest ov humanity, what a disgusting misrepresentation & absolute insult to the diligent hard working scottish person who grew up in a council scheme, lives mair or less roun the corner from where he/she grew up & has tae witness marauding gangs ae wee gobshites patrolling aboot night efter night makin abdy’s life a misery. A’ yous posturing liberalist political wannabes wie yer constant stream ae 2nd rate journalese are daen is makn things worse instead ae better.

    1. Frank Mahann says:

      A working class hero. Bless!

  7. Paddy Farrington says:

    In endlessly obsessing about the likely results of the 2026 Holyrood elections, are we not in danger of succumbing to what Marx once called parliamentary cretinism (albeit in utterly different circumstances)? Namely, the notion that fundamental change can occur solely as a result of parliamentary arithmetic.

    Come 2026, the SNP will have been in power for 20 years. We need a candid assessment of what has been achieved, and what it has failed to achieve, during that period, and above all, some big new ideas to tackle all those difficult issues – social inequality, land reform, local democracy – that have been kicked into the long grass for too long. Furthermore, issues bigger than independence – climate change denial, the growth of racism – may come to the fore in Scotland in a way they have not yet done: why should Scotland be immune from the change in the political climate worldwide?

    What we need just now is to support initiatives – party and non-party – to build a broad progressive grassroots alternative – a popular front, if you will – to take on the forces of neoliberalism, racism, and climate change denial. It will include some supporters of independence, but others as well. We need some kind of historic compromise between Scotland’s progressive movements – the labour, national, and Green movements. Independence should be a big part of that mix of course, but cannot be the whole or the only thing.

    1. Hi Paddy, yes your probably right, which is why I normally steer clear of it. Your final paragraph nails it.

    2. Cathie Lloyd says:

      To go back to Marx again, years ago I had to read his political journalism (1848 revolutions and 18th Brumaire) there’s a lot of good sense in the methods he used there worth revisiting. Particularly to be on the look out for promising green shoots to support. I think that supports the idea of aligning with grassroots initiatives.

      1. Thanks Cathie. I think we’re getting somewhere. ‘Collective sense-making’ I think its called. Maybe that’s too pretentious. Digging out your references to read-up.

        1. Cathie Lloyd says:

          I’m going to have to dig out my Progress publishers booklets to re- read these – last studied in mid 1970s but left a deep impression. I hope you enjoy.
          My task ( as MA student at Birkbeck) was to write a review of these. One of the most fruitful exercises as I remember but hope I’m not overselling!

          1. Ha! I went to Birkbeck too.

        2. 241205 says:

          I’m a big fan of collective sensemaking, the democratic processes by which, in the absence of any transcendent authority, a general will or consensus emerges from the chaos of our individual interests and perspectives to constitute truth and justice and meaning. That was the subject of my PhD thesis, back in the eighties, whether such processes could ever be ‘decisive’, i.e. issue in any final answer to the question as to what’s true and what’s right.

          My conclusion was and still is that truth and justice and what the world’s ‘really’ like is fundamentally undecidable and that the process of our collective sensemaking is unending. What’s important is not what’s ‘finally’’ True or Just (which is fundamentally undecidable), that we defend he freedom and democracy of our collective decision-making processes to ensure that, as far as possible, the collective decisions by which we in society construct what’s true or false, right or wrong, real or illusory, are at every time an expression of the general will of our society rather than of any private material or ideological interests within that society.

          Politics then becomes less about winning heart and minds over to your way of thinking (aka ‘the Truth’), and more about creating deliberative institutions in which no one’s ‘Truth’ can prevail and in which truth and justice and meaning are instead products of perpetual negotiations that are free and democratic.

          Practically, to work (to issue in an expression of the general will), collective sensemaking requires that:

          1. Every citizen or member of a political community, without exception, is allowed to take part in the deliberation of any collective decision of that community.
          2. Every citizen is allowed to express their attitudes, desires and needs without fear of reservation.
          3. Every citizen is allowed to question or introduce into he deliberation any assertion whatsoever.
          4. No citizen may be prevented by internal or external coercion from exercising their rights to free participation and expression in public decision-making.
          5. The principle of subsidiarity obtains: that central authorities should have only a subsidiary function, performing only those tasks that citizens can’t perform at a more local level.

          Given that ‘God’ is dead and there remains no transcendent measure by which we might determine what’s true, right, and real, these are the principles we should be seeking to institute and defend against authoritarianism in all its guises in our public life.

          PS
          Something that’s always struck me about Marx’s political journalism is that it reports less what actually happened (which is, of course, undecidable and which, in any case, Marx didn’t himself witness) and more what *would* have happened *if* the actors had behaved in accordance with his theoretical prescriptions. Even his journalism was ideological.

  8. Innes K says:

    Fogginess about unity and direction seems frustrating when the path is right there, and everyone can see it.

    The UK economy after Brexit is drifting at the mercy of the elements. It’s acutely over-centralised in London, systemically unjust, and the consequences in fragmentation, dislocation, and hysterical populism among the electorate are on the news all day every day.

    Problem is – ‘the economy’ is an abstraction for most voters. It’s a thicket of acronyms and percentages, a jargon that looks suspiciously like it is meant to exclude us out here, but doesn’t appear to be understood much by the ones that speak it either.

    But folk have to see that the UK is locked into decline, that today, Tuesday 3rd December, is the very best it can ever be, and that tomorrow it’ll be a bit further down the hill. Scots that can, will emigrate just as they’ve always done. The remaining will become poorer, more unhealthy, and ever more subject to the whim of those who retain leverage and strive at any cost to retain it. It is happening right in front of our eyes, it’s not a scare story.

    The limits of an economy are the limits of its resources. One thing Scottish people and even economists know is that Scotland is resource-rich and of major geo-political importance. An independent Scottish economy can sell across the border and elsewhere rather than being used as a disposable means to the short-term political ends of Westminster. At present its resources are being sunk in a bottomless pit at Westminster. The faster resources of the UK deplete the more obvious the effect on Scotland while London grabs onto whatever it can to survive. The more that it is made in the image of Westminster, the less the Scottish economy can thrive.

    Folk need to be able to see the UK economy for what it is, and what is happening on the ground now as it declines. They need to be able to contrast that with the economic alternative in an independent Scottish state with power over its own currency and forward planning that it can use specifically for the resources of its own territory, and its specific demography. Scottish decline is not locked-in.

    Nothing new in this. Together, the various Yessers need to hammer the economic points, and stick to them. They’re not going away.

    1. John says:

      Innes – absolutely correct and I do think majority of electorate are receptive to this message. It must be repeated ad nauseam to overcome negativity of opponents with examples of where it would benefit people from day 1 of independence.
      Top this with a hopeful vision based on simple principles that the majority will be energised by for example:
      all Scottish people being valued and treated fairly as equals regardless of background or wealth
      building a society where we all support each other and look after sickest and poorest members.
      supporting a democracy where decision making is taken at a level as close to the people as possible.

    2. Well said Innes. Agree 100%.

    3. 241206 says:

      Innes, you could equally say that the Scottish economy is drifting at the mercy of the elements of global events, that power is acutely over-centralised in Edinburgh, and that Scottish politics is dislocated by the fragmentation of the Scottish electorate along separatist and unionist lines.

      Also, where is the ‘hysterical populism’ among the UK electorate? Populist parties (notably Reform UK) won only 14.3% of the vote in the election earlier his year; that is, almost 86% of the electorate voted for the establishment parties.

      The only thing that’s ‘hysterical’ is your sky-is-falling narrative.

  9. mark says:

    oh aye, & before ombdy fails tae contain thir excitement given recent events/bereavement/seasonal change ye micht wint tae remind yersel that the ald Burns line regarding the ‘parcel of rogues’ hus rung true so often in scotland/alba’s history that it should really be no surprise tae find that as time slips away it is ever more rather than less on the nail tae the extent that a referendum on whether that particular tune should be wur nashnil anthem wid be a cause all would be lying tae themselves if they did not acknowledge tae be if not essential as least highly appropriate

  10. duncanio says:

    The explanation of the NSP approach to restoring Scotland’s full self-government that you requested I provide you has not been posted while my earlier comment and your response has disappeared.

    Have they been deleted?

  11. 241204 says:

    Black Swan theory is a new name for an old way of thinking. Our very own Davie Hume originated it during the Scottish Enlightenment, when he expressed his scepticism about drawing general conclusions from specific observations, a scepticism that was later taken up by Hugh MacDiarmid in his call to nationalist politicians to embrace the ‘impredictability’ of history.

    All consequential events, whether in science or in politics, come from the unexpected. It’s only in hindsight that we find those events explainable.

    PS
    “Scotia Irredenta [unredeemed Scotland] is another realisation upon which a creative Scottish nationalism must be erected… By ‘Scotia Irredenta’ here I mean the realisation of the extent to which our national accomplishments have been restricted and our potentialities inhibited by the identification of minor and transitory manifestations with the terms ‘Scotland’ and ‘Scottish’… And at the same time I am protesting the idea that a scheme for developing the poultry industry in Ayrshire or reafforesting part of Sutherlandshire, or re-establishing a parliament in Edinburgh, or, in short, any scheme to do anything at all, political, economic, commercial, or industrial – except to rouse a distinctive and dynamic spirit in Scotland again AND WITHOUT ANY CUT-AND-DRIED SCHEMES LET THAT SPIRIT FIND ITS OWN FORMS no matter how impredictable and how unrelated to anything in our past history [they] may be – has anything whatsoever to do with Scottish nationalism.

    “The curse of Scottish psychology has been its insatiable itch to domesticate every issue with which it has been concerned; and the curse of the National Party today is its desire to foresee and guide the course of events. Nothing that can be so foreseen and guided is worth a curse; Scotland needs a great upwelling of the incalculable.”

    – Hugh MacDiarmid: The Caledonian Antisyzygy and the Gaelic Idea

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.