Things Can Only Get Better

The key fact that Scottish Labour seem to have missed is,that the SNP are now the Scottish Govt. This level of denial has led them to come up with a suicidal policy switch of now backing a referendum on independence. The Scottish Government will decide the term, timing and process of the now inevitable referendum vote, whatever Labour thinks. They can no more force the agenda than they could prevent people deserting Labour in droves in last weeks elections in England and Wales.

 

Wendy Alexander’s announcement that she and her immediate colleagues have completely changed their public position on a referendum on independence is not only a catastrophic mistake in political strategy, it is also been implemented in a hopelessly inept manner.

 

It was a decision that was clearly not made in communication with her Scottish Labour MSPs, her colleagues in the Calman Commission or her Cabinet members at a UK level. When this calamity is combined with her brothers gloriously inept handling of the Scottish Elections, for which he has not yet been held to account, it does look like a spectacular contribution by one family.

 

One thing that has been forgotten about this by all the media is that this is no blurted out – on the hoof make it up as you go along policy. It is the manner that it came out that gave the impression, disjointed, ad hoc and generally all over the place. Several key Scottish bloggers had the story at the time, while the rest of the media ignored it, but Wendy started her leadership with a ‘slip’ at her very opening speech.

 

At the Apex Hotel in Edinburgh, when she launched her leadership in September she hinted at how she might be prepared to call Salmond’s bluff. ‘There will be a referendum in 2010,’ she told the delegates. The press ignored this for some reason. So she’s had eight months and three media advisers to stew over this idea.

Tim Luckhurst’s analyis – and the Times publishing of it – is predictably reactionary nonsense seemingly immune to international law. Luckhurst (or ‘Nae Luckhurst’ as he was dubbed after his brief and calamitous reign in charge of the Scotsman) in his argument that all members of the Union should vote on Scottish Independence misses history from his analysis. The Scottish movement for self-determination in various guises is over 100 years old. It has been through an intense period over the last decade. It is for our country to decide its fate. Of course negotiations for settlement would proceed, but that is a separate matter. All else is jangling nonsense.

As Ewan Crawford writes in the Guardian: “The SNP believes that a referendum in 2010 offers perhaps the best possible prospect for a “yes” vote. At present, opinion polls are fluid. What seems clear from the polls is that the preferred current option for most Scots is a parliament with greater powers – for example over tax and benefits – but within the UK. But crucially, when the option of greater powers is removed, the polls show virtually an even split for and against independence. Oddly, Alexander wants the referendum to be on the straight yes/no question, which dramatically increases independence support.”

Crucially also, and this is about the problem of a party that has been so embedded in Scottish culture for decades, the Labour Party confuses itself with The Scottish People. So, when they have a visceral hatred of the SNP they assume that this is reflective of the general will. The reality is that many people – who in no way would have described themselves as nationalists or supporters of independence (not always the same thing) – have been quietly but deeply impressed by Salmond’s administration. In equal measure many have been dismayed by Brown at a UK and Alexander at a Holyrood level. Add to this the dreaded prospect of another Tory Govt waiting in the wings under Cameron and I believe Scotland would win the Referendum vote, and become independent.

One commenter on the Guardian site summed up what many are feeling today: “Financially Scotland would really be no better or worse off out of the UK. Politically though, it would no longer be dominated by the English right, we would no longer have to keep nuclear weapons in our country, we would no longer see our friends and family members in the armed forces packed off to the Middle East to do the dirty work of the American neo-cons and big business and above all we would no longer need to listen John bloody Motson during the World Cup. I will be voting “yes”.

It may not be rational, economically tested or level-headed but it does I believe sum up the predominant mood. As a friend of mine said to me over the top of the morning paper this fine sunny day: ‘Things can only get better.’

Comments (3)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. bellacaledonia says:

    More here:

    “In theory, forcing his hand on the date of a ballot could be an astute political initiative that would serve the noble cause of the Union. In practice, nonetheless, the way in which this has been handled by Ms Alexander is little short of a fiasco.”

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/leading_article/article3897123.ece?openComment=true

    Gordon Brown’s woes deepened last night as he faced Labour’s worst opinion poll results since records began and the possibility of an unprecedented SNP-Tory alliance at Westminster after the next General Election.
    The YouGov poll, taken after Labour’s election meltdown in England and Wales last week, placed David Cameron’s Tories on 49%, Labour on 23% and the Liberal Democrats on 17% – the governing party’s worst showing since polls began in 1930.
    It came as the SNP and Tories sought common ground for deal-making if Mr Cameron becomes Prime Minister. Mr Salmond said that Nationalists would vote with the Conservatives at Westminster after the next General Election if that was in Scotland’s interests.

    http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/display.var.2258423.0.Salmond_offers_a_Commons_pact_to_Cameron.php

    So where’s your referendum now? At Prime Minister’s Questions, Gordon Brown offered an entirely different interpretation of the scenario offered by Wendy Alexander.
    According to Mr Brown, Ms Alexander had not demanded an immediate referendum on Scottish independence.
    “That”, he opined in response to David Cameron, “is not what she said.”

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/briantaylor/2008/05/wheres_your_referendum_now.html

    There’s only one thing worse than not getting what you want, and that’s getting it. The SNP had been expecting to get on with the business of running a highly successful devolved administration for the next three years, not mounting a case for full separation from the UK. But suddenly everything has changed.
    http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/iain_macwhirter/2008/05/grasping_the_thistle.html

  2. Cruachan says:

    30 Months to go…..

    The unravelling of British Labour is the other side of the coin to the inexorable unravellling of the concept of Britain. UK Labour (and, I would add, the UK state, civil servants and London-based media) have been suprisingly slow to adapt to the emerging realities of a confident (and popular) SNP Government in Scotland and a post-devolution Britain.

    Whilst we can all agree that Wendy Alexander’s tactics and timing over the “Bring it on” referendum question was inept, it is clear that she and some of her fellow Labour MSPs recognise the historical shift that is happening in Scotland – and perhaps other parts of the UK. Readying Scottish Labour for a post independence Scotland – or even a Scotland with a much higher level of devolved powers to Holyrood – is perhaps the only game in town for an increasingly desperate Labour Party.

    The practical achievements, and political panache, Alex Salmond and his Government have demonstrated in its first year stand in stark contrast to the downward spiral of UK and Scottish Labour. This is not “just” about the independence issue but about which party is best placed to safeguard and advance the social democratic values that Labour used to champion. Attacks on civil liberties, ID cards, nuclear policy, subservience to American global interests, illegal wars and creeping privatisation of the NHS are what is turning people way from Labour in Scotland and the rest of the UK.

    The SNP is offering Scotland a new vision and a new kind of politics which could be a positive model for all the nations of Britain. Whether Scottish Labour and the “British Labour Party” can adjust in time will be interesting to watch over the next few years. With less than 30 months before the Referendum, they are running out of time.

  3. Marian says:

    Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation 🙂 Anyway … nice blog to visit.

    cheers, Marian.

Keep our Journalism Independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address to subscribe for free here and receive Bella direct to your inbox.

 
Bella Caledonia