2007 - 2020

Debt: The First 5000 Years

The real dirty secret is that if the deficit ever completely went away, it would cause a major catastrophe.” – David Graeber

As the US plays tug of war in a peculiar Jeckyll & Hyde war of economic ideology, Jesse Singal reviews David Graeber’s Debt the First 500 Years.

We’re at a strange, dangerous point when it comes to debt in the United States. It’s accepted that, if you are a middle-class (or poorer) striver, you and your children will be deeply in debt for large periods of your lives. First, student loans. Then a mortgage. Finally, college loans for your children as they begin the same cycle. Not to mention the inevitable credit card and other consumer debt accrued along the way. It’s hard not to overstate what it means for a society built on opportunity that opportunity and massive debt now go hand in hand.

Into this messy situation steps David Graeber, an anthropologist at Goldsmiths College at the University of London, with “Debt: The First 5,000 Years.’’

The snore-inducing title is unfortunate, because this is quite an engaging book. Part anthropological history and part provocative political argument, it’s a useful corrective to what passes for contemporary conversation about debt and the economy.

“A debt is the obligation to pay a certain sum of money,’’ Graeber writes. “As a result, a debt, unlike any other form of obligation, can be precisely quantified. This allows debts to become simple, cold, and impersonal – which, in turn, allows them to be transferable.’’ But material obligations, as Graeber demonstrates through anthropological literature, have always existed in one form or another, but in the best cases were entered into and discharged in a manner that tended to treat people as people, not as units of potential currency, or, worse, as criminals.

Graeber’s examples of past formulations of debt are fascinating. Take the women in one tribal society, who were constantly borrowing small amounts of everything from each other. Everyone was indebted to everyone, and this helped keep the community tightly knit. Or the early medieval Irish jurists who tried to put a specific price on every possible injury or slight (“if stung by another man’s bee,’’ read one code of law, “one must calculate the extent of the injury, but also, if one swatted it in the process, subtract the replacement value of the bee’’).

Graeber is deeply critical and skeptical of modern formulations of debt, which stem from the idea that each human is a rational actor seeking to spend the least and get the most, and that this results in something called “the market’’ that is best left to its own devices. Given that throughout history, trade has usually meant back-and-forth with a neighbor or a friend rather than an impersonal financial entity, why should we scrub the human aspect from it?

But this is “Debt’’ at its most macro level. The book spends far more time tracing the history of debt – and with it, concurrent histories of everything from slavery to prostitution – than with explicit arguments. The effect is that, on balance, the book recounts history more than it argues.

When he does argue, it’s hard to disagree with much of what Graeber has to say. In the United States, for instance, he writes that “the problem of loan-sharking was brushed aside by making real interest rates of 25 percent, 50 percent, or even in some cases (for instance payday loans) 120 percent annually, once typical only of organized crime, perfectly legal – and therefore, enforceable no longer by just hired goons and the sort of people who place mutilated animals on their victims’ doorsteps, but by judges, lawyers, bailiffs, and police.’’

Sure, it’s rude to talk about things in such language. But we’ve built a peculiar system that saddles families with unsustainable debt, and there’s been very little debate about the fundamental factors that underlie this fact. So perhaps we can excuse Graeber using slightly overheated language, reserving our ire for the people who insist that it’s the market, not people, whose urgent demands for autonomy need to be satisfied at every turn.

Jesse Singal is a frequent contributor to the Globe. He can be reached at jessesingalglobe@gmail.com. Follow him on Twitter @jessesingal.

Tags:

Comments (0)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. G Barrie says:

    Maybe its time to end all the global monopoly games, and start anew. Maybe someone needs to go into the temple and kick over the boards and shout “game over”.
    If Greece, Portugal, Spain say “can’t pay, won’t pay,” who would be the losers?
    Who would be the losers if globally all debts were cancelled?

    1. vera says:

      I am for it. And I don’t see any losers at all. The banksters are already rich, they’d weather it. And the rest of us would benefit directly.

    2. cynicalHighlander says:

      You’ll find the answer in here.

  2. David Graeber says:

    Absolutely. Actually at the end of the book I argue for a Biblical-style Jubilee. Money is just a set of promises; there’s no reason we can’t all agree to call them off.

  3. bellacaledonia says:

    Like a debt amnesty?

    Interesting. I like it.

    This post has just knocked up some whopping figures. The most-read article this year.

  4. james mc donald says:

    There you are then the silent majority agree.Pity they don!t stand in the streets, or more importantly, take advantage of the voting system.Bella the we midgie bit and feel the sting.

  5. james mc donald says:

    There you are then the silent majority agree.Pity they don!t stand in the streets, or more importantly, take advantage of the voting system.Bella ye wee midgie, bit and feel the rub.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.