British Values


In 2006, Corporal Donald Payne was the first British soldier to be convicted of a war crime in this country under the International Criminal Court Act 2001. His crime was the inhuman and degrading treatment of prisoners held by British Forces in Southern Iraq in September 2003. He received a year in jail and was dismissed from the British Army for his crime. However, whereas a foot soldier who is complicit in torture is sent to jail – as the book reveals, for those higher up the social spectrum a CBE, knighthood or peerage await. Such is the hypocrisy in the British history of torture

If that sounds like an unlikely or extreme thing to say, I can only respond by saying read Cruel Britannia by Ian Cobain.

His book is a remarkable narrative and will come as something of a shock to most readers who are taken in by Britain’s image of fair play and decency abroad. This is a myth, as Cobain explosively demonstrates. When the publishers sent me the manuscript I wrote to them that it was like hand grenade rolled into the heart of the British Establishment. Here is why.

Firstly, the book is explosive because it reveals direct participation by the United Kingdom in torture since 1944. This probably will come as a great surprise to many readers but the official line that “the British do not participate in torture”, is revealed as just part of a deliberate and well-practised line of deceit. The book charts the use of torture from “the Cage” in London used to interrogate leading Nazi’s at the end of the Second World War, through the colonial campaigns of Kenya, Cyprus and Aden and then makes the link to Northern Ireland, Iraq and Afghanistan with the repeated and wilful use of “the five techniques”. It exposes the exceptional brutality of the British in the treatment of the Mau Mau in Kenya – as is just beginning to emerge in the case of Nzili, Nyingi and Mara, currently being heard in the High Court.

Evidence reveals that one British policeman at the time described the conditions in the camps as “far worse than anything I experienced in my four and a half years as a prisoner of the Japanese”. To hear the British described as being more brutal than the Japanese will come as a great shock but, should there be any doubt as to the depravity of British Forces, the description in the book is unequivocal:

Men were whipped, clubbed, subjected to electric shocks, mauled by dogs and chained to vehicles before being dragged around. Some were castrated. The same instruments used to crush testicles were used to remove fingers. It was far from un-common for men to be beaten to death.

If this still does not convince any reader then, if they can get to London, I suggest they go to the High Court to hear it for themselves.

This savagery by the British continues throughout the colonial period and Cobain details the campaigns in Cyprus against EOKA and in the Aden Emergency where yet more torture was perpetrated on those we captured. The book then makes interesting references to the refinement of torture techniques which were developed in between 1950-1970 known as an “assault on the mind” whereby far subtler techniques capable of causing “irreparable psychological damage” were developed. The scientists found that a combination of five things: sensory deprivation through hooding, together with enforced stress positions, white noise, sleep prevention and very little food together produced “stress that was almost unbearable for most subjects”.

This resulted in what became known as the “five techniques” which were subsequently employed against the IRA during interment in 1971 and later banned in the case of Ireland v UK in the European Court of Human Rights in 1978. Yet, despite the assurances of the British Government that such practices would never again be repeated in any circumstances, Cobain makes the very alarming claim that the five techniques were in fact retained by the UK which is, perhaps, why they re-emerged in Iraq in 2003 and why the doctrine cited by the Intelligence Branch during the second Iraq War miraculously went missing when it came to the Baha Mousa trial in 2006 and the Inquiry two years later.

The second reason why the book is explosive is because it exposes the institutional cover up that has been perpetrated throughout the post war years. At the time of writing this article there is a sense of national outrage at what appears to be an institutional cover up over Hillsborough and connivance by numerous institutions in the Savile affair. Indeed, it seems to be a national trait that there are so many institutions and individuals who are prepared to participate, passively or actively, in a cover up of scandals for something as prosaic as enhancing their own career prospects or reward from the State.

The ‘Establishment’ is shown to be remarkably adept at not establishing the truth using methods every bit as subtle as those developed by the interrogators in the 1950’s – 70. At the same time, the book reveals the courage of a few men and women who stand against torture. Men such as Colonel Arthur Young who repeatedly complained to Sir Evelyn Baring about the “unjustified or abhorrent crimes by British Forces” in Kenya but who resigned when he realised that Baring and others were not interested in his complaints. Or Lord Gardiner, who spelt out the legal position that the five techniques were a flagrant breach of International and domestic law but who was similarly ignored lest it get in the way of an interrogator’s war. At the same time, the few good men who do speak out know what fate will befall them. Craig Murray was drummed out of the Foreign Office for revealing Foreign Office connivance with torture evidence and Ben Griffin, the former SAS Trooper who spoke out against the UK treatment of prisoners in Afghanistan, is now living under a Government injunction which prevents him from speaking any further. If he breaks the terms of the injunction he will go to jail. In Cruel Britannia you can lose your job or go to jail for revealing UK complicity in torture and rendition. Those who are complicit meanwhile remain untouched and untroubled. The only tap on the shoulder is the sword used to knight them.

Finally, the most explosive part of the book is the fact that complicity in torture and rendition are potentially war crimes and are required to be outlawed in our domestic criminal law. The UN Convention against torture (UNCAT) states:

Each State Party shall ensure that all acts of torture are offences under its criminal law. The same shall apply to an attempt to commit torture and to an act by any person which constitutes complicity or participation in torture.

If such acts are committed during armed conflict then they constitute a war crime or, in the case of rendition, a crime against humanity. However, to date despite increasingly weighty evidence no one has been prosecuted. As the Tory MP David Davis recently stated in the case of R v Ahmed and others:

Although the combined circumstantial evidence of complicity in all these cases is overwhelming, it has not so far been possible — because of the government’s improper use of state secrecy to cover up the evidence — to establish absolutely clear sequences of cause and effect.

And here lies the rub. As the weight of evidence mounts up, so the State becomes increasingly desperate to cover up. Miliband (David) pirouettes in the High Court, Straws denies any involvement in rendition before his assurances are contradicted by the discovery of documents in Tripoli. Then up pops the so called “Justice and Security Bill” – currently making its way through Parliament – in a desperate, blanket attempt to cover up all UK complicity in torture and rendition. However, the more attempts there are to cover it up the more the issue is exposed and it must be the supreme irony that as details of torture are finally being exposed from Kenya, the Government is embarking on yet another cover up.

This is why Cobain’s allegations in Cruel Britannia are like a hand grenade in the heart of the establishment. The truth has had the pin pulled out of it by this book and is likely to go off at any moment. When it does, it will not only be the foot soldiers who end up being caught in the explosive consequences.

The Reverend Nicholas Mercer (formerly Lieutenant-Colonel Nicholas Mercer) was the Liberty Human Rights Lawyer of the Year 2011-2012 for integrity and courage in the face of dissembling and denial of human rights abuses by British forces in Iraq. This article was first published by Open Democracy  under a Creative Commons licence.

Comments (14)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published.

  1. Anne R Ward says:

    Indeed, David Cameron’s G Grandfather Ewan Cameron, was in the business of Mind altering tests.

  2. RT broadcast a report last week in which it was claimed that the majority of US citizens now believe that torture is justifiable. Whether or not this can be attributed to slanted polling, loaded questions, the rotten influence of Hollywood or whatever else, the very fact that ‘enhanced interrogation techniques’ has become an acceptable synonym for gratuitous brutality and sadism speaks volumes.
    I don’t know if any similar polling has been done in the UK – it is extraordinary that any civilised society should feel the need to ask its own citizens such questions.
    Of course, the ‘British’ way of dealing with it is to pretend it doesn’t exist. Jack Straw is not the only member of parliament who has form when it comes to the tacit encouragement and defence of such putrid behaviour – it is an utter disgrace that he, and those who aided him during his term as Foreign Secretary, are not behind bars awaiting trial at The Hague.
    Back in 2004 the SSP protested at Prestwick Airport – we were angrily dismissed as conspiracy-theorists and quislings by those (if memory serves, across all other parties – please correct me if I’m wrong) who took Straw’s word that no rendition was taking place, either here or via Eire.
    If this book does what Nicholas Mercer claims, we are obliged to deal with it – millions of people across this planet have found out, to their cost, what the British State is all about. Like it or not, and at the risk of scaring the fucking horses ‘Yes Scotland’ seem so preoccupied with, a lot of us are facing a precipitous learning-curve – if we don’t get our heads around what The Realm is, and what it’s capable of, we’re sleepwalking into a fight against something truly diabolical.
    Think that’s an exaggeration? Try explaining it to Baha Mousa’s weans.

  3. If it isn’t ‘off-topic’ to highlight an example of what our Allies have been up to, please watch the following, but beware – it is one of those stories you wish you’d never heard. Seriously. I read it, watched the accompanying video maybe four/five months ago and haven’t been able to shift it out my heid.
    And isn’t that the nub of the problem here? No ordinary human wants to countenance the fact that others are capable of such vile behaviour. But then, few of us are subjected to the ‘training’ experienced by those recruited in the shopping-malls of areas where a steady supply of bored, susceptible teenagers is guaranteed.
    What happened to John Needham is unusual only insofar as his tragedy is well documented – that doesn’t mean it it is well-known. (Salon-com, for example, published a version of his tragedy which bears little resemblance to the account detailed below.)
    In this country, Gordon Gentle is one of the very few names recognised by ordinary folk as a casualty of the Iraq ‘war’, and that’s due solely to the efforts of his Mum. When Rose Gentle stood as a candidate in East Kilbride against Adam Ingram, he turned up for the announcement, surrounded by his minders and buddies – when he saw Rose he shouted ‘Oh look, there’s Saddam’s little helper!’
    That’s the type of ‘human being’ we’re dealing with here – a man capable of traducing a bereaved mother, in public. Pure class, eh?

    1. David Moynagh says:

      I myself used white noise and experimental conditions for human subjects for my undergraduate thesis. It was at that time I discovered that one of my psychology lecturers, who was ex military had been responsible for designing psychological interrogstion.technques during the Korean war in the 1950′ s.

  4. David Moynagh says:

    Why am I and millions of others not surprised
    when in fact we should all be appalled.

  5. David Moynagh –
    I presume you are familiar with Bowart’s ‘Operation Mind Control’?
    From what you say about White Noise/Vibration etc, I guess you’ve come across that book – it’s very difficult to buy because, allegedly, the CIA bought the original print in bulk and destroyed it. The average price for a 2nd-hand paperback is £40-£50.
    The fact that the military have always been interested in mind control/torture shouldn’t be surprising to anyone, but, as you say, it is appalling all the same. What does it say about the governments who fund such behaviour? And what does it say about ‘civilised’ citizens who return such governments to power?
    There is no logical reason to suppose that Scots are less susceptible to brainwashing than anyone else – that’s why I worry that we’re heading into a situation that could become very ugly very quickly, and few of us would be able to discern what’s ‘real’, what isn’t.
    The advertising/entertainment/political/academic fields have become nightmarishly anodyne – the horrible truth is that the secession of Scotland will mean the end of the UK. That won’t be allowed. It may happen legislatively, but will never be permitted.
    That’s the great fear of Yes Scotland, the SNP, and many of us who talk-up Independence without daring to face what the reaction of The Realm is likely to be – those charged with preserving the Union will never appear on blogs, or telly/radio, stating their case. They have other methods of making sure they get the result they want. That’s not to say they will, but we need to be aware of what’s possible, and ignoring the obvious – based on recent documented facts – doesn’t help the cause one bit.

  6. Sion R Williams says:

    It will be recalled that it was the British who instigated concentration camps – against the Boers – at the beginning of the 20th century.

    Further illuminating reading can be had in the works of John Pilger – notably, Freedom Next Time (Black Swan Books)

  7. Clydebuilt says:

    The Disappearance of Craig Murray

    by craig on January 7, 2013 in Uncategorized

    Ian Cobain’s history of British state involvement in torture, “Cruel Britannia” – appears to have been radically censored between the review copies and publication.

    This from Peter Oborne’s review of Cruel Britannia :

    Some heroes do emerge from this sordid story. There is Lt Col Nicholas Mercer, the British army lawyer, who warned against the Iraqi atrocities. He was frozen out of the army and is now an Anglican priest. And Craig Murray, the British ambassador to Uzbekistan, was horrified by what he found out and lost his job.

    While Nicholas Mercer’s own review has this:

    At the same time, the few good men who do speak out know what fate will befall them. Craig Murray was drummed out of the Foreign Office for revealing Foreign Office connivance with torture evidence and Ben Griffin, the former SAS Trooper who spoke out against the UK treatment of prisoners in Afghanistan, is now living under a Government injunction which prevents him from speaking any further. If he breaks the terms of the injunction he will go to jail. In Cruel Britannia you can lose your job or go to jail for revealing UK complicity in torture and rendition. Those who are complicit meanwhile remain untouched and untroubled. The only tap on the shoulder is the sword used to knight them.

    Yet the book as put on sale contains not one single mention of me or my evidence, and the book’s chapters on British complicity with torture in the war on terror are extremely short and scanty, given Cobain’s genuine wide knowledge and expertise in the subject.

    For a book to be radically changed between the review copies and general release is very unusual. What exactly has happened here?

    UPDATE Comment from Ian Cobain below states that I was never in the book. I should be interested in any further comment he has as to why it is so thin on recent torture; there is a great deal of fascinating and directly relevant stuff that I know he knows that is not there.

  8. Denis says:

    There is a certain distancing effect here by the use of the word ‘British”. Perfectly accurate of course.

    Yet it’s probable that Scots troops engaged in this torture and murder. I for one don’t doubt it.

    Yet has there been a protest from any MSP, any Scots MEP or any Scots MP?

    Crivvens! No!

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.