2007 - 2022

Risk Assessment

slide0162_image003This is a useful response to the much repeated idea that all of the risk is with becoming in charge of your own affairs. The reality is that the real risks lies with staying within Broken Britain. It’s also interesting to reflect on Gerry Hassan’s recent lament that “there is the absence of forensic, systematic critiques of power and elites. We used to do this.” We still do.

This from the Reid Foundation…

There has been much analysis of the risks that would be faced by an independent Scottish economy. By way of balance, the Reid Foundation has published a report that examines the risks of the UK economy we actually have. The Mismanagement of Britain concludes that Britain has seen at least 40 years of declining competitiveness resulting from poor economic management and that we face a high likelihood of another financial crisis in the near future. It also demonstrates that the only reason Thatcher’s ‘economic miracle’ wasn’t an immediate economic disaster is because decline was disguised by a massive injection of income from North Sea oil.

The key findings of the report are as follows:

  • Britain is in long-term competitive decline when compared to the rest of the world
  • But it is also in long-term competitive decline when compared to other advanced economies
  • It has also experienced particularly marked short-term fluctuations in its ccompetitiveness, which indicates not only that it is particularly exposed to external economic shocks, but also that there has been mismanagement of the UK economy
  • For 40 years the UK national accounts have shown a fundamental weakness at the heart of the UK economy with an increasing deficit in the UK trading account in general goods and services
  • This deficit was disguised throughout the 1980s by the use of North Sea oil and in the 1990s and 2000s through rapid expansion of ownership and trade of financial assets and liabilities
  • The scale and rate of growth of the external assets and liabilities of the UK economy – which are now both of a magnitude equivalent to over 700% of UK GDP – are such thatit gives the UK economy the profile of a large bank, not a national economy
  • And to give an example of just how exposed the UK economy is to credit risk, almost a quarter of the UK economy’s external assets consist of financial derivatives: these financial derivatives themselves are of a magnitude equivalent to 240 per cent of UK GDP
  • In 2008 the non-financial sectors of the UK economy were used to prop up the financial sector, but the non-financial economy is so small compared to the financial sector, its capacity to do that is exhausted and it is unlikely the UK could again bail out the finance sector
  • The finance sector makes profit through expansion of financial assets and liabilities (they have doubled every nine years) but indefinite expansion is impossible, making indefinite profitability of the current financial model also impossible
  • There is no significant growth in other parts of the economy capable of replacing declining profit from the financial sector
  • Since the UK economy remains so exposed to risk and external shock and since there has been no rebalancing of the economy since 2008, the UK is arguably in a significantly more dangerous position than it was in 2007

The fact that these phenomena are much more marked in the UK than any of its competitor nations suggests something specific has happened in Britain. The report shows that this can largely be put down to long-term mismanagement of the UK economy by successive governments:

  • A ‘misguided pride’ in having a ‘strong’ currency led to three prolonged periods where currency value rose even as internal prices rose (the opposite should happen), seriously harming the UK’s export capacity
  • Generally, Sterling has been managed as a ‘sub-optimal’ currency for economic growth, having instead been managed as an optimal currency for financial growth. This has had a particular impact on regional economies outside London
  • A long-term decline in trade in goods and services disguised by oil and then financial speculation was ignored
  • There was virtually no appreciation of the risks the financial sector posed to the overall economy or of how unstable the tax revenues of the financial sector might be
  • The outcome was predictable – the decline in productive economic activity such as producing and trading goods and services along with an unsustainable rise in non-productive trade in financial instruments, resulting in a grossly unbalanced economy with a high exposure to risk and a low level of resilience to economic change.

Go here for the full report: http://reidfoundation.org/


Comments (0)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Charles Patrick O'Brien says:

    Strange when I went to like the blog I was told that its the wrong name and password no email by that name,strange.

  2. David McCann says:

    Cant say I had a problem. Ive shared it to my Facebook without any problems. Try again.

  3. cirsium says:

    Thank you for drawing attention to this report which sets out the reasons why Scotland cannot afford to be part of the UK. Independence is the lifeboat which is going to allow us to escape from this Titanic.

    1. davidmcgill says:

      Well and simply put!

  4. Dave Coull says:

    It is sickening to hear foolish folk saying Maggie Thatcher “saved” Britain. She was just lucky, that’s all. She benefitted from the enormous windfall of North Sea Oil, something that no previous prime minister had, and something no later prime minister would ever have to quite the same extent again. Oh, there had been a bit of oil when James Callaghan was pm, but it was really just getting started, it was Thatcher that got the full benefit, and she squandered it on Trident, and militarism, and corrupt favours for her pals, and paying out unemployment benefit. And of course she pushed the mad idea that we didn’t need to MAKE things, we could thrive by providing global financial services. It was a stupid project which was bound to fail and which has failed

  5. davidmcgill says:

    Just cant disagree with that statement!

  6. Barontorc says:

    What Maggie Thatcher did was work on one side of the book; cut costs, got rid of failing industry instead of investing in it, socially engineered society to go from rented to owner status, set about decimation of the too dominant union base, shut down the trade unions by closing the coal industry and concentrated on imported coal, stopped steel making forcing what was left of our rapidly diminishing manufacturing base to import steel product and thereby ratcheted-up the UK balance of payments deficit side, chased world power by fighting wars that should have been avoided, cynically ignored the social costs and all affected by it and then capped it off by wasting the windfall of Scottish oil to fund it.

    Of course the other side of the book then showed as mass unemployment, no job creation, indigenous skills in shipbuilding, mining, engineering and manufacturing all lost in favour of money market driven service industries with a hugely inflated benefits sector resulting and no future prospects for many, young and old alike and predominately from these traditional manufacturing areas of the country.

    Dicken’s Micawber had it simply right; ‘..income, 20 shillings and expenditure 19 shillings and sixpence, result, bliss and happiness
    – expenditure, 20 shillings and sixpence, result misery!

    Would it not be eminently sensible to create many thousands of jobs and get everyone back to work, earning wages and spending, paying taxes and being involved in society – not be forced into disillusion, no hope, no dignity , no care and surviving on now unaffordable state benefits. Plonker economics!

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.