2007 - 2020

When No Means Yes

BhYt31dCQAA_35FAs the Unionist parties begin to complete their attempts to persuade you that by voting No, you will get Yes (reminiscent of the Vote Blue Go Green?) we’ll be publishing a series of stark reminders about why this is an exercise in hoax politics.

These are the parties who opposed devolution, who opposed a referendum, who told you in 1979 there would be more powers, and who have spent the last year telling you that not only does your country and your culture not exist, but you are incapable of running it.

The Tories opposed devolution right through the 1990s, and during the devolution referendum in 1997; and Ruth Davidson campaigned against more devolution when she fought for the party leadership in late 2011. During the leadership race, she said the new Scotland Act was “a line in the sand” and insisted she would oppose any further devolution. Labour’s bizarre pick and mix politics revealed today is such a pigsty it shows they have never really recovered from their ‘Bring It On’ fiasco. As our friend Mr Bateman puts it (‘Is that it?’):

Welfare is what Labour voters would liked to see in the hands of the Scots but that has been cherry-picked to include the bedroom tax which as been effectively neutralised anyway. Leaving almost the full range of benefits in the hands of the Tories is a vote-loser. Corporation tax would have been a logical adjustment – it’s already mainstream as an idea in Northern Ireland – but Labour’s timidity in  differentiating Scotland gives the game away…they are resolutely British first. The same applied to air passenger duty. It’s a no-brainer for developing tourism, one of our biggest industries. So it would create an anomaly in the UK but aren’t anachronisms what the Union is all about? This is low level stuff in terms of the UK economy and in terms of the debate – it’s like control of air guns – but still they flunked it. This is a package defined by what it doesn’t offer rather than what it does. Not only does this miss the target, it wont even be part of a united Unionist package before the referendum, adding to the sense of confusion and lack of commitment they offer. I am a relieved man today.

Comments (0)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. tartanfever says:

    Goodbye Scottish Labour, you finally died today.

    Time to stop this idiocy of using ‘Scottish’ to describe them- there is one Labour party, run from Westminster.

  2. bringiton says:

    Labour’s One Nation vision,determined by voters in England.
    Scotland will not be allowed (at least if Labour are in power in London) to do anything which diverges from the Daily Mail view of life.

  3. No comment from me needed.

  4. ramstam says:

    Question – Why does nobody ask why English politicians have full powers over their constituents anent foreign policy / economics etc. because of their inbuilt majority at Westminster, yet we in Scotland have to anguish over an extra 5% powers via devolution? Equal Union ? Makes nae sense . When I speak to somebody thinking of voting NO I ask them – Do you think anybody in London is lying awake at night worrying what they can do for Scotland? That’s our job ! Vote YES!

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.