2007 - 2021

Scotland and Palestine

scotpalestineThe 5th of June marked what Palestinians call Al Naksa (the Setback), referring to the 1967 War when the Israeli forces demolished homes and villages, displaced hundreds of thousands, and occupied the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Today, Palestinians have been demonstrating to commemorate this, being met by rubber-coated steel bullets, tear gas and sound bombs; the Israeli government just announced that it plans to build 1500 new homes for Jewish-only colonies on usurped Palestinian land.

Last month in Palestine was a microcosm of the brutal and systematic Israeli oppression that has characterised Palestinian daily life. Palestinian homes in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem continued to be demolished. (During the skewed ‘peace talks’, Israeli forces demolished 500 Palestinian structures.[i]) On the 15th, Palestinians commemorated Al Nakba (the Catastrophe) – the 1948 ethnic cleansing of Palestine by Zionist militas. Israeli soldiers shot and killed two unarmed teenagers Mohammad Abu al-Thahir (16) and Nadim Nuwara (17). They were murdered during a demonstration near Ofer jail in the West Bank.[ii] A video of the killing was circulated by Defence of Children International. Ten days later, Pope Francis made an unscheduled trip to pray at the apartheid wall in Bethlehem, by doing so he brought to world attention the most potent symbol of colonial racism.[iii] By the end of the month, over 200 Palestinian prisoners were on hunger strike in solidarity with others being held in ‘administrative detention’, a practice whereby individuals are incarcerated without charge or trial. 40 hunger strikers were hospitalised due to their deteriorating condition. There are now over 5000 Palestinians in Israeli jails – around 190 of those in administrative detention, eight of those are elected members of the Palestinian Legislative Council.[iv]

In response to this ongoing injustice, an increasing number of people in Scotland are driven by indignation at the practices of the Israeli state to take action in various ways. Solidarity activism takes a variety of forms: being part of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement; engaging in Palestinian cultural events; hosting Palestinian speakers. A variety of grassroots organisations have emerged to promote and advocate the realisation of fundamental human rights for Palestinians. Palestinians in Scotland, Scottish Jews for a Just Peace, Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign (BDS) and Student Palestine Solidarity Scotland are all active groups, occasionally co-ordinating activities together. There is not one city in our country that lacks a coherent group dedicated to the Palestinian cause. University students have played an integral role in activism, notably as the driving force behind the 2012 demonstrations in solidarity with Palestinian hunger strikers. Hundreds of people marched to the BBC HQ in Glasgow to protest the broadcaster’s choice of omitting to cover those hungering for justice.

The Scottish Government position has been ambivalent and inconsistent. In April 2010, Alex Salmond was quoted as saying “you can’t have normal relationships if you believe another country has been involved in what Israel has been involved in.”

This was hugely encouraging to hear. Granted, it was not an explicit statement supporting sanctions, but this language indicated a timid approach to an endorsement of it by the Scottish government. In May 2014, Humza Yousaf spoke to Glasgow Jewish Representative Council. He stated that it is Scottish government policy not to boycott Israeli goods (including those from illegal Israeli colonies), that the Scottish government’s approach to the Middle East “doesn’t vary much from the UK government,” and that Israel is not an apartheid state. This is as surprising as it is disappointing – in Scotland, we have worked hard to distance ourselves from British policy on Palestine. We hope that an independent Scotland would adopt a foreign policy of peace, co-operation and opposition to nuclear proliferation.

The British state has been vital to the colonisation of Palestine, starting formally with the Balfour Declaration in 1917. Military and diplomatic support remains unwavering almost 100 years later. UK arms sales to the Israeli state in the past few years amount to £35 million. F-16 fighter jets – used to flatten Lebanese and Palestinian civilian areas – contain UK manufactured components.[v] The British ambassador to Israel, Matthew Gould, is openly Zionist. During his time working in the British embassy of Iran, he was responsible for co-ordination on US policy relating to the country. In terms of news coverage, the BBC does a superlative job of completely distorting the reality of Palestine into a story of a between equals, where Israeli lives are infinitely more valuable (and therefore reportable) than the lives of Palestinians.[vi]

Many of us within active groups campaigning for Scottish independence want our country to adopt a foreign policy oriented towards social justice and human rights globally. By extension, this means that officials of an independent Scotland would not give diplomatic cover to, or support in any way, a state that is guilty of systematic human rights violations. The Israeli state’s policies in relation to Palestinians in the Occupied Territories and Israel are direct violations of the International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination and the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid. Israel is the only power in its region armed with nuclear weapons, and refuses to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

An independent Scotland should acknowledge the Palestinian 2005 call for boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel, by ensuring it terminates all trade, cultural, military and diplomatic links with it. The BDS call was recently endorsed by the outgoing UN Special Rapporteur on Palestine, Richard Falk.[vii] Economically isolating the state with sanctions is an effective, non-violent method of compelling the Zionist government to adhere to international law. Scotland could set an important precedent as a western state taking a legal and moral stand against the Israeli project of occupation, colonisation and apartheid. This approach to foreign policy could be made concrete by having our principles expressed in a written constitution. This could simply state that Scottish agencies or companies cannot engage with states perpetrating human rights abuses. Adherence to the this article of the constitution would be maintained by strong grassroots campaigns and civil society organisations. This described is inter-state activity; for individuals, Scotland could play a positive role also. It could open up its universities to Palestinian refugees, by offering them fully-paid undergraduate degrees.

Now numbering around 7 million, Palestinian refugees are the most unique: they are not refugees by virtue of fleeing from violence, but from being barred from returning home, by Israeli law. In December 2012, Venezuela abolished – for civil and diplomatic passports – entrance visas for Palestinians.[viii] Scotland could feasibly adopt this measure also, although it is mostly a gesture of solidarity. These are small gestures do more to express our progressive values than confront the colonial occupation of Palestine. The adoption and promotion of sanctions is the priority, and the move which will yield best results, in terms of pushing for Palestinian freedom in the long-term.

Scotland has the resources to achieve social justice for its own people, but this can be internationalised and can set an example for other societies to do likewise. With gaining autonomy and sovereignty, the burden of responsibility emerges and must be embraced. The conflict in Palestine is not complex or intractable, and can be reduced to asking ourselves if we would prefer choosing the status quo of siding with the oppressor or the less-trodden path towards elemental justice.


[i] http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=693796

[ii] http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/video-shows-unprovoked-cold-blooded-killing-palestinian-boys-israeli-forces

[iii] http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/05/pope-sets-up-israel-palestine-trip-vatican-2014525121656783176.html

[iv] http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/maureen-clare-murphy/israel-holding-9-palestinian-legislators-without-charge-or-trial

[v] http://www.caat.org.uk/resources/countries/israel/

[vi] http://medialens.org/index.php/alerts/alert-archive/2008/539-covering-israel-palestine-the-bbcs-double-standards.html

[vii] http://www.bdsmovement.net/2014/falk-outgoing-12066

[viii] http://venezuelanalysis.com/news/7530

Comments (11)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. mary vasey says:

    I agree wholeheartedly with you. Thanks for an excellent article

  2. Abulhaq says:

    an nakba, i assume al naksa is a typo, was technically actually the period from the foundation of the Jewish state in 1948 when the Arab-Jewish conflict began in earnest leading to the mass exodus, deportation, eviction etc of Arabs from the former British protectorate of Palestine. The term is interesting in having been first used by the Syrian Christian intellectual Constantin Zureiq who conceived of an Arab nationalist revolution in politics, thought, ethics, science and culture without which he believed the wider Arab world would continue to be a pawn in other people’s games. Contemporary history demonstrates how right he was. Lessons for Scotland too as we strike out on our own.

    1. Abulhaq says:

      Additionally, Zureiq coined the term with specific reference to the “affliction” suffered by Arab civilisation in general and the need for fundamental intellectual renewal. It was only later used of the Palestinian case which Zureiq viewed as symptomatic of a greater malaise.

  3. yerkitbreeks says:

    What can we do for the mess that is the Middle East from here on the sidelines. The reality was brought home when I watched ” Five Broken Cameras “.

    It is the centre of the three Abrahamic faiths, and although Civil Rights and big nation hegemony are all mixed in, it seems that ” an eye for an eye “, rather than ” turn the other cheek ” has a lot to do with how things go. The religious pressure groups exert huge influence. If the Talmud or Qu’ran is the law and the priests see themselves simply as policing law rather than being able to modify it, little will change.

    An American who returned home after unsuccessfully emigrating to Israel once said to me he couldn’t understand why there was so much fuss ” over a little bit of Real Estate “.

  4. Abulhaq says:

    i am in agreement with Mr Yousaf on the boycott issue. There has been enough aggressive action and talk on both sides. Jew and Arab need to be allowed to talk without hecklers braying and yelling from the sidelines. International intervention has not delivered. This is a thorny issue which the history of the region since the Roman conquest shows is not a simple good guy v bad guy tale. The end of the Ottoman system, which while rickety did work, and the betrayal of the Arab revolt and the Hashemite clan’s Faisal ibn Hussein by the British and French via the Sykes-Picot plan laid the foundations for the current nakba. Palestine needs support but support that goes beyond the dangerous commonplaces of threats and name-calling and yet more spilled blood. Kifaya! Enough!

    1. Sad that the Scottish government are refusing to consider sanctions against Israel. The Israeli government couldn’t care less if other governments criticise it, but if they lose them money, then they’ll care and have to consider whether the settlements and the blockade and the occupation are worth the costs. I expect Cameron and Clegg to do nothing – hoped for better from Salmond and Sturgeon.

  5. joseph O Luain says:

    The Sterne-Gang hasn’t gone away you know.

  6. Clootie says:

    1948 at the foundation of the Israeli state 6 Arab countries executed a well planned and co-ordinated attack. The stated intent was to destroy Israel on the day it came into existence.

    It is always easy to lay the blame at the feet of one side in this conflict. In common with many others I have no idea how this question will be settled. However I do know that it will not be by the USA or the UK. We need diplomats from somewhere such as South America.

    1. Well since the Israeli intent was to destroy the Palestinian state and replace it with Israel, it’s not surprising that Palestine’s Arab allies attacked Israel. You do know that as soon as the Zionist militias that would become the IDF won that war they carried out massacres of Palestinian civilians across the country designed to get as much of the population as possible to flee to other countries, before refusing them the right of return (Plan Dalet)? See Israeli historian Ilan Pappe’s book ‘The Ethnic cleansing of Palestine” and American academic Norman Finkelstein’s ‘Beyond Chutzpah’ (both his parents were holocaust survivors).

      It is currently easy to place blame on the Israeli government because it has now taken 95% of the land and has 95% of the military strengthe, yet at no point in over 60 years have they offered Palestinians anything approaching a viable state – and even during periods of peace they shoot unarmed protesters dead with live ammunition – like the two mentioned in the article above – two out of dozens killed every year in similar circumstances.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.