Food of the Nation

For Features/Money Page Humphrey Errington of HJ Errington and Co one of the Lanarkshire Exhibitors at BBC Good Food show at the SECCJoanna Blythman on the Errington Cheese case – and the wider implications for small-scale food producers and Scottish food culture. This article was first published in the Bella Caledonia print edition, available monthly as a supplement of The National.

Errington cheese has become a cause célebre for small food companies throughout Scotland. The case has triggered the foundation of the Committee for the Defence of Artisan Food to “support and defend small businesses and artisans producing real, healthy, small-scale foods against any arbitrary, unreasonable, disproportionate actions by food and/or public health authorities”. If you’re not sure what’s been happening, here’s the executive summary.

Food Standards Scotland (FSS), a new public body set up in 2015 to ensure food safety, is adamant that cheeses made by the distinguished Lanarkshire-based Errington company were “the most likely source” of the E.coli 0157 infection that poisoned up to 26 people and killed one in the late summer of 2016. It has issued an order that effectively stops sales of all batches of the company’s cheese.

The Errington company strongly disputes that its cheeses caused the outbreak. Actalia, a state-of-the-art specialist lab in this field that tested batches implicated by FSS, has concluded that the bacteria present lacked the necessary genes to make them poisonous. Emeritus Professor Hugh Pennington, the UK’s leading authority on E.coli O157 food poisoning, the bacteriologist who led two major public enquiries into outbreaks of this type, has also said that Food Standards Scotland has “no microbiological evidence” to link Errington cheese to the Scottish outbreak.

How can this dispute be resolved? Given the grave charges FSS has levelled, and the disputed interpretation of laboratory test results, you might expect that the Errington family would have a formal means of appeal. But there is no way for an accused producer to challenge the ordinances of FSS, however draconian, because it has been set up without any appeals process. The only option left to companies that stand accused is to take court action. To date, the Erringtons have had three ‘wins’ in the Court of Session but spent over £100,000 on legal costs and lost upwards of £300k in sales revenue. Remarkable public support for the family has been expressed in the form of £34,500 of donations towards its legal defence, but few small companies would have the means or determination to take on the FSS.
FSS is “a non-ministerial office part of the Scottish Administration, alongside, but separate from, the Scottish Government”. It is mainly funded by Scottish taxpayers’ money, but it seems to be accountable only to its handpicked board. Ministers can intervene if FSS commits an offence, but are not obliged to do so. Everyone appreciates that FSS needs strong powers to protect public health, but can it be right that it acts not only as prosecutor but also as judge and jury?

Feeling mounts that that the bureaucracy known as the ‘food police’ does not deal evenhandedly with small and large companies. Last summer, over 200 people were made ill by E. coli 0157 on bags of washed salad leaves sold in supermarkets; two of them died. But neither FSS nor the Food Standards Agency in England has taken any action against the companies that sold these lethal products.

FSS takes its lead on strategy from the Food Standards Agency, and its new regime allows big companies to audit their own safety protocols, explicitly using models developed by Tesco, the company that sold us burgers with horse meat. This stated intention of this quasi-self-regulation is “freeing up” custodians of food safety to focus on smaller “rogue operators”. Just last month it emerged that one in four slaughterhouses in England and Wales are failing to take basic hygiene precautions to stop contaminated meat reaching butchers and supermarkets- who knows if Scotland is any better?- yet the FSA is considering relaxing requirements so that slaughterhouses deemed “compliant” will get a full audit only once every three years.

The Errington case has had a chilling effect on Scotland’s artisan food community. Cheesemakers have begun pasteurising their products to avoid the attentions of FSS. It insists that raw (unpasteurised) milk cheese is high risk, a non-science-based prejudice resoundingly debunked by the US Food and Drug Administration. It tested 1,606 raw milk cheeses last year and found less than one per cent contaminated; a very favourable comparison with other types of food we eat every day.

Many small food companies in Scotland now fear an FSS knock at the door, a guilty until proven innocent charge with no means of redress other than financially ruinous legal action. In the past Scottish ministers have uncritically backed Scotland’s food exports, such as farmed salmon, while ignoring the fledgling artisan food sector at home. Now they see images of small-scale producers as a handy way to add value to the generic Scottish food brand and talk up the concept of Scotland as a ‘good food nation”. Meanwhile our real food heroes are struggling with the imposition of an industrial food system, wrapped up in the language of health protection.

Comments (7)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published.

  1. c rober says:

    Its also like the planning system , single developer or home owner slapped down , big developer riding roughshod…..

    So if the independent of govt control model for food isnt working , evenly , nor is the tesco model uniquely , then what to do about it is the bigger question.

    do we go back to a MMB board with proper accountability , well now that EU is off the table , but then that still wont tackle the other problem of same Tesco and other companies driving down prices.

    Multiple pronged legislation?

    MMB paying for regulation and testing , setting pricing , Holyrood insisting on co2 taxes as transit tarrifs meaning more local milk for local supermarkets , if More bureaucracy is bad , is that not why the brexit result happened , and if less means deaths , where then is forward is it then backwards?

  2. Brian says:

    FSS and its predecessors have conducted a long-running vendetta against companies like Errington for a considerable time – certainly extending back long before 2015. I remember at the turn of the century or thereabouts, similar situations involving Dunsire Blue and other cheeses.

    Like most bullying bureaucrats, FSS torments isolated individuals but runs scared from the big boys.

    I don’t know if the Scottish Government can bring FSS to heel but perhaps we ordinary folks could at least pester our MSPs to investigate an organisation that seems to be a law unto itself. If people across Scotland e-mailed or wrote to MSPs about this, then perhaps some of our 129 legislators might realise that the strong smell doesn’t come from the cheese but from FSS intransigence and harassment.

    Who has the better track record and reputation for scientific rigour and even-handedness – FSS or Professor Pennington?

    In my area, North East Scotland, there is one constituency MSP and eight List MSPs – I’ve block e-mailed all of them pointing out the Bella Caledonia article and briefly asking if they can do anything to look into FSS. I’m not politically “savvy” (naive would be an apt description) but the high-handed ways of FSS seem like the thin end of the wedge (sorry) and they need to be made to account for their actions.

    There are eight regions – another seven people block e-mailing their MSPs would cover all 129. Collectively, it doesn’t require much effort. Hopefully, though, there are more than eight of us ordinary folks who rile at faceless bureaucrats riding roughshod over small companies and individual families.

    1. Jim Sramper says:

      Good idea to lobby MSPs. Whoever think it is acceptable it is acceptable that the FSS and FSA’s new regime allows big companies to audit their own safety protocols and, as you write “this quasi-self-regulation is “freeing up” custodians of food safety to focus on smaller “rogue operators”.
      This reliance on these big companies on being very public minded and being so responsible it is unthinkable they would do anything as crass as putting profit before their customers wellbeing is similar to what happened when the same reliance was put on big builders to build our schools without any oversight by the local authority professionals; walls fell down due to bad practice and only by luck was no-one injured. We need to back artisan producers by buying from them, not faceless corporations who pack food with additives to prolong shelf life and add chemical flavourings rather than use good nutritious ingredients. Back your local producers of real nutritious food.

  3. Iain says:

    There seems to be a history of the authorities ganging up against the Erringtons. Did the local council have a go at them about 20 years ago? This is terrible news. On a recent trip to Ireland, I was amazed by the variety and quality of cheeses available, and had to contrast that with the relative paucity of local cheeses in Scotland – although they do exist. FSS needs a drastic overhaul soon unless we are to lose what we have in some bureaucratic maze.

    1. Legerwood says:

      There are probably more cheesemakers in Scotland than you realise. An awful lot of their output is sold through farm shops not supermarkets. Lidl does have Scottish cheeses on sale from a cheesemakers in Tain.

  4. Wullie says:

    For the life of me I just cannot understand why they don’t just pasteurise the milk, folk used to die in their thousands due to unpasteurised milk. It’s like stupid parents who decline to have kids vaccinated ignoring the evidence of past decimation amongst kids! Governments have a duty of care to the peeps! End of!

  5. Clive Scott says:

    Quite agree Wullie. Public utterances from Errington smack of the typical selfish Tory outlook on life. Me me me me me.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.