Missed Climate Targets Shows Need for Urgent Action

A climate emergency declaration, a commitment to net-zero emissions by 2045 and a scrapped tax cut for the aviation industry; over the last month we have seen the Scottish Government setting out their climate credentials. So the news this week that they had missed their climate target for 2017 is a reminder of the need for strong, early action alongside commitments.

The Scottish Government’s goal of reaching net-zero emissions by 2045 is a welcome improvement to our long term ambition and will see us taking in more emissions, through forests and peatlands, than we give out within a generation. A positive signal that has now been followed by both the UK and Welsh governments.

This scaling up of long term ambition is meant as a response to our deeper understanding of the reality of climate change, illustrated most clearly by the UN’s climate scientists in their report on global warming last October. The difference of half a degree, beyond the 1.5°C threshold to 2°C warming, will mean huge increases in the numbers of people facing drought, a near total destruction of coral reefs and an ice-free arctic once every ten years. If we carry on as we are today, estimates see us going beyond that threshold in a decade.

That’s why a missed target for 2017 reveals an awful lot more than a positive commitment for 2045. As the UN’s scientists said, the next decade is the crucial one and a closer look at the stats in the Government’s report reveals where we are currently off course.

If we take the example of transport, it’s easy to see the problem of failing to act in a nutshell. How we travel around makes up the largest single source of emissions in Scotland, accounting for over a third. In the same year as the Scottish Government heralded the Queensferry Crossing, emissions from road transport became the largest single source having increased by 11% since 1990. Plans for a tax cut for the aviation industry have already been scrapped but even at current levels, emissions from flying went up in 2017.

In many ways, travel patterns are getting worse for our planet. According to Dr Andy Cope, Director of Insight of Sustrans (an SCCS member), there is significant traffic growth in the motorway network. And the baby boomers who are entering retirement now have higher car ownership levels and drive more.

But in major cities, according to Dr. Cope, “traffic levels have reduced and more people reach the centre by public transport. Young people are learning to drive later and are making fewer trips by car. These trends suggest that, through our continued investment in huge road programmes, we are building a transport system which will not stand the test of time. Worse, we risk locking in the most damaging aspects of travel by continually developing the road network, rather than investing in the alternatives which are both better for the planet and meet the demands of future generations”.

The Government has committed to ‘phasing out the need’ for fossil fuel vehicles by 2032 – but this has yet to be set in legislation, and not enough steps have been taken to invest in alternatives like public transport, active travel, and low emission vehicles. The building of a major, well-connected network of walking and cycling routes in our major cities alongside a targeted public information campaign could deliver a mode shift from cars to cycling or walking that would make a really meaningful dent in our emissions. There is no need to wait till 2032, this can be done within a five year period – if the political will is there.

A closer look at emissions from the transport sector demonstrates the wider problem we face. The recent emissions statistics, and the Government’s declaration of a climate emergency, must come as a wake up call that we need to change our approach. It really is black and white, urgent action is needed to tackle pollution. If we act now we could put out the fire that Greta Thunberg speaks of, but the window to do so is getting narrower. A declaration of emergency has to mean rapid action now, before it is out of our hands. Fortunately our MSPs have the perfect opportunity to respond, matching up their promises with policies, in the Climate Bill currently making its way through the Scottish Parliament.

To look at the positives, emissions in Scotland fell by over 3% between 2016 and 2017, largely driven by the closure of Longannet and smaller falls in agriculture and residential emissions. However there are sectors of Scottish society where we have barely scratched the surface but where policies to slash emissions are needed now. And it’s important to remember that many of these changes bring with them huge benefits for all of us. A better, more connected public transport system will cut emissions and clean up the air we breathe. Better insulated homes mean fewer people struggling in fuel poverty. Supporting farmers to grow our food more sustainably and to use resources more efficiently would also help. A just transition for those in the fossil fuel industry that ensures all workers and communities benefit from the move to a zero emissions economy will cut our emissions. The action we need to take is totally necessary but it’s also full of opportunity for people in Scotland.

We need to see higher ambition for the crucial next decade, and we need to see the policies to help us get there today.

Comments (2)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published.

  1. Nick Kempe says:

    If you take into account all the carbon generated by the stuff we import, from manufactured goods to food, and the emissions caused by transporting this here is it really true that Scotland’s emissions reduced between 2016-17? The advanced capitalist countries always leave the carbon emissions they generate elsewhere that out of emissions accounting and then right wing commentators blame countries like China for the rise in global emissions claiming Scotland’s contribution is so small it doesn’t matter. Carbon accounting should measure our carbon impacts across the world.
    To tackle climate change, its not just the Climate Bill that’s important but ALL Scottish Government legislation. The Planning Bill, currently also going through the Scottish Parliament is a prime example. It could be used to ensure that no new developments are given the go-ahead unless they are carbon neutral or could be. For example we need to create a set of planning laws that prevent new developments which depend on increased car travel rather than public transport – for the reasons set out in this article.

    1. Mike Heinemeier says:

      Surely renewable energy from wind
      generators and incentives from the Scotgov to move to electric vehicles will dramatically reduce our transport emissions. This must be given absolute priority, not just for climate change but for cleaner air for our citizens. The financial savings from lower pollution related illnesses will justify financial investment now.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.