Secure Scotland, Towards Peace

Ahead of the Women Peace & Security debate in the Scottish Parliament, and as we are once again, on the brink of war, Janet Fenton writes on the Secure Scotland initiative.

A small group, now called Secure Scotland, came together last year through shared concerns about international relations and what is termed ‘security’. We all considered that that the mainstream discussions in Scotland on peace and security were mired in militarist definitions. Voices of many people in Scotland – and from around the rest of the world – go unheeded, important aspirations are unheard and new or different approaches are ignored.

We discussed Scottish political party policies, the UN Sustainable Development Goals, and the Scotland’s for Peace Covenant, “We desire that Scotland should be known for its contribution to international peace and justice rather than a launch pad for waging war.”

When many politicians and other leaders refer to security, their ideas are informed by a culture of militarism,violent masculinities and discrimination. We wanted a clear alternative way of thinking and talking that could allow decision makers to develop policies and plan actions that contribute to understanding and defining real security needs, including the planetary emergency that is threatening the whole world.

Utilising Scotland’s separate legal, parliamentary, and education system we might be able to enable some changes locally that would be more difficult to establish outside Scotland. Proportional representation and an accessible parliament provide distinct opportunities. Scotland is a small country, so we can talk to each other and create a visible cohesive and clear model of the Scotland we could become, to which people outside of Scotland can also relate.

We agreed to widen our discussion to include the Scottish Parliament, civil society, academia, faith and community groups in order to talk about things that make people feel safe, how they could be put in place and who might do that. We also wanted to highlight where the present ‘security’ measures are actually making people less safe. So far, we have held a residential seminar-style event, in which entrepreneurs, artists academics and activists and several weel-kent dreamers of the New Scotland participated, considering food security, basic income, non-adversarial parliamentary action, violence reduction and various aspects of formal and informal education and more. We have also collected some responses to our ideas and held stalls at various events in order to talk to people.

We are starting the new decade by supporting a cross party debate initiated by Emma Harper MSP (a participant at the Secure Scotland Seminar) on the United Nations Resolution that addresses Women, Peace and Security. Emma’s motion and the debate on Wednesday 8th January after 5.00pm can explore how Scotland might approach a National Action plan on this resolution, which calls on UN Member states to act on the disproportionate and unique impact of armed conflict on women.

It recognizes the under-valued and under-utilised contributions women make to conflict prevention, peacekeeping, conflict resolution, and peace-building. Although Scotland is not a member of the UN, the Parliament and the Government in Scotland are not necessarily represented well by the UK administration, and we could reflect and build on the good work done by the Scottish Parliament in improving legislation to uphold women’s human rights.

Secure Scotland has already reached out successfully to a wide range of Scottish organisations and individuals. We agreed that it was important not to distract people already taking action, or to create a ‘new campaign’, so the project aims to develop a like-minded network to help each other make one of the changes that are needed. We defined this as:

• To shift prevailing discussions on ‘Security’ away from a toxic militarism and patriarchal dominance that lead to environmental degradation , and instead to address the real threats experienced here in Scotland – naming them and providing impetus for change.

• To celebrate and highlight existing initiatives and situations that constitute what really does give Scotland security.

We are keen to hear from other people and organisations that share our desire for change.

The present Core group for the project comprises: Janet Fenton, David Mackenzie, Gari Donn, Malcolm Spaven, Luke Padfield, Caroline Uchimi, Tony Fitpatrick, Murray Dickie and Jessica Wheeler. Our new website will soon go live to augment our Twitter account @SecureScotland and the [email protected] email address.

Comments (4)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published.

  1. Tony Fitzpatrick says:

    A grand piece by Janet highlighting issues which have my full support. The need to re-frame the whole mindset around the terms ‘security’ and ‘defence’ could not be greater or more timely.
    Scotland has a real opportunity here to redefine public policy and the whole narrative around what truly makes people feel secure in their own communities. We need to empower citizens to engage in a dialogue beyond that defined by the ‘security industry’ and move on to a more positive discourse.

  2. Grafter says:

    All well and good but we need to be an independent nation before we have any impact on securing a more peaceful world. American terrorism is the greatest problem facing the world today and the voices of those nations who are free from their malign influence can make a difference.

    1. Robbie says:

      Could,not agree more Grafter, the devils advocates are gathering and gaining strength again just as in the previous world war ,hence Wasteminsters drive to leave the EU and become ha,ha “Great “again, Time for Scotland to make its own decisions in this world.

    2. Janet Fenton says:

      Meantime debates like the one held the other night can help to make the case and gain support for Scotland’s cause across the world, and the legislation that has been passed already by our Parliament has put women in a stronger place as well as challenging the traditional view of security, and that’s good for Scotland. I want Scotland free and autonomous, but I am not for sitting around waiting for indy when there are things we can do better, more fairly, and more creatively right now here in Scotland, not only through our Parliament but through civil society, media and culture. (You must know that, or you wouldn’t be reading Bella Caledonia because it wouldn’t have come into existance!)

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.