2007 - 2021

Capital City, City of Capital

 

A major new report published today (‘A Just Capital: Actions to End Poverty in Edinburgh’) confirms what residents and citizens have been saying for years, that the housing crisis is at the very heart of the problem of poverty and inequality in Edinburgh. It outlines that: “1 in 3 families in the city living below the poverty line are only in that position due to their housing costs, compared with 1 in 8 households who are in poverty across the country as a whole.”

As housing campaigner Niamh Ní Mhaoileoin puts it: “One in three families living in poverty in Edinburgh have been put there by their housing costs. In other words, if those families had lower rents and secure tenancies they wouldn’t be in poverty. It’s time to build the social homes Edinburgh needs.”

The report notes: “Throughout the course of our work we have heard, perhaps more than anything else, of the intolerable toll living in poverty takes on people’s mental health. People have told us they are exhausted physically and emotionally, having to make impossible decisions about living costs. They have told us they struggle to find support, often feel shamed and judged by others, and feel trapped in a system that does not care about them.

Read the full report here and the supplementary data and evidence paper here.

We’ll be reporting separately on the recommendations later but here are some key findings:

  • Housing is ‘the single most important’ factor in reducing poverty in Edinburgh.
  • In the wealthiest city in Scotland its estimated that almost 78,000 people are living in poverty, representing some 15% of the population and as many as 1 in 5 of all children.
  • As the Covid recession begins to bite, the report estimates that number could rise by at least 4,500 people by spring 2021 unless significant action is taken now
  • Inequalities are entrenched in Edinburgh. A boy born in some affluent parts of the city can expect to live 21 years longer than one born in a poorer area.
  • In schools, the city does better than the national average for pupils from affluent areas but worse for those from poorer areas.
  • The majority of people living in poverty in Edinburgh are of working age, in employment, living in rental accommodation, with the highest rates experienced by families with children. Such families live in every area of the city, in every type of neighbourhood and community. The majority of people in poverty in Edinburgh do not live in those areas commonly considered as ‘deprived’. Very often these families will be affected by illness, disabilities and mental health problems brought about either as a cause or a consequence of the poverty they experience.
  • Edinburgh is the least affordable city in Scotland to buy or to rent a house. Average house prices are more than six times average earnings. The cost of buying is too high for many and the lack of social housing and growth of the short term let market means many are trapped in unaffordable private rental accommodation.
  • The report heard of the fear that rising housing costs are making ever larger parts of the city ‘unliveable’ and the isolation felt by the large number of people living in temporary accommodation, disconnected from family and friends.
  • The report outlines: “Covid has shone a light on pre-existing inequalities. Edinburgh experienced one of the largest drops in job vacancies in the UK between March and June, while the number of people claiming unemployment related benefits in July 2020 was more than three times the level recorded a year ago. Already, those in low paid jobs have been impacted most by a cut in working hours and redundancy and longer term an increase in the number of people pulled into poverty is likely. In our interim report we reflected the significant trauma felt by many of those having to claim out of work benefits for the first time.”
  • Premature mortality rates for people from the most economically deprived parts of Edinburgh have always been significantly higher than average, and there are significant fears for widening health inequalities flowing from both the health and economic impacts of Covid.
  • The experience of those struggling previously has been made significantly harder during the current crisis with particular impacts for young people, disabled people, black and ethnic minority groups, and women. Our interim report spoke of the overriding sense of fear in which many people are living.

None of this will be news to those of us living in poor quality sub-standard housing, exploited by our landlord or struggling to make ends meet. We didn’t need a report to tell us this. But maybe a city that glories in self-congratulation, endlessly deflects criticism, operates a clandestine network of power and patronage, and designed this housing crisis did.

Comments (4)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. SleepingDog says:

    The greatest source of wealth is the exploitation of others?

  2. Anndrais mac Chaluim says:

    I don’t really see anything radically new in this report.

    Basically, what its recommendations boil down to is that those of us who experience poverty should be able to access ‘one-stop shops’ where we can get ‘the right support in the places we live and work’.

    By ‘right support’ the commissioners mean services, the design of which is based a relationship between service provider and service user that draws on the knowledge, ability, and resources of both to develop solutions to issues that are claimed to be successful, sustainable, and cost-effective, changing the balance of power from the professional towards the service user.

    I haven’t been in the care and support game for a while now, but the idea of ‘co-production’ has been around at least as long as austerity and has been driven by the imperative of cost-effectiveness that constrains our local authorities.

    The elephant in the room of co-production is that local authorities, as service providers, retain command and control of ‘the resources’; they are also lacklustre when it comes to releasing ‘the knowledge’ and ‘the abilities’ of service users in service design. Community engagement in authority-led planning is woefully low and disincentivised by at least the perception that it’s only tokenly consultative and issues in no real outcomes, but only further policy and strategy reviews and further cycles of planning. Commissions like the EPC, whose work it declares has now ended, come and go as part of an almost self-contained knowledge-economy. They create the appearance that something is being done but make little if any difference to the lives of the poor-who-are-always-with-us.

    Little will be achieved towards the abolition of poverty until the resources are devolved to communities themselves, where their deployment can be informed by the knowledge and abilities those who experience poverty themselves; that is, until services users and service providers become the same thing.

    What’s needed is not more ‘one-stop shops’ and ‘co-production’, but more direct economic democracy.

  3. Blair says:

    The problems here and in other Bella posts have a common denominator of failure in our governments systems. Covid-19 has shone a light on the preexisting inequalities and it highlights that those who are employed by the government, local authorities etc. are relatively free from losing their income compared to everyone else confined in positions in the real world!
    The only way we can change things is by setting fixed time career limits within public sector to create opportunities and ensure those in power (and management positions) are not just protecting their own interests ahead of the rest of society.
    Changes are always being made but until we can get our governments financial systems working for everyone poverty will continue.
    While we cannot all be equal there is no excuse for a proportion of us to remain in a poverished state in & through our pensionable years.

  4. florian albert says:

    As Mike Small writes, there is nothing new in this report.

    The problem, which goes far beyond Edinburgh, is that inequality is not a major political issue. During the boom years, up till 2008, it wasn’t. In the period 2008 – 2020 it hasn’t been. It is unlikely to be in the near future – there are too many different groups each fighting to ensure that they are spared in the present and future economic downturn.

    Unemployment – especially among the young, rather than housing, is likely to be the problem which occupies most politicians’ time.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.