2007 - 2021

Manifestos 2021: The Scottish National Party 

In the second part of this series, we examine the manifesto that is the likely programme of government for Scotland. All of the policies referred to in this article can be found here

It is a truth universally unacknowledged that a party which consistently receives between 45-50% of the vote must be popular for a reason. Commentators either take the SNP’s success for granted or, worse, resort to unionist bromides about ethnic nationalism.

The SNP are successful because of their messaging. When Nicola Sturgeon tells us to “work as if we are indeed living in the early days of a better nation” it is hard for readers of a blog named after an Alasdair Gray character not to get excited. Most voters will be delighted that 100,000 new homes will be built and that a National Care service will be established.

Wrap around childcare that is free for the least well-off and an increased Scottish Child Payment will do a great deal to ameliorate child poverty, especially in single parent households. Even more important, in a country in which the foodbank queues grow daily, is a policy to provide free breakfasts and lunches to all children in primary and special schools. One of the most morally repugnant things the Tories have done to this country is to inure us to tales of hungry children in our classrooms. For huge numbers of Scots, the SNP are worth voting for because ‘they’ll stop the Tories’. That does not just mean stopping the Tories from winning seats: it means stopping them from starving children.

However, as fourteen years of SNP government have taught us, the disappointment is often in the detail. An increase of 25% in mental health spending sounds promising but is only a sticking plaster when no health board is even close to reliably getting patients an appointment with a psychologist. £33 billion on infrastructure sounds great, but will it simply continue the Scottish Government’s love affair with polluting forms of travel? Citizens’ assemblies sound promising, until you read that they will be used to discuss the council tax (hint: you pledged to abolish this 14 years ago).

The SNP seem to love a consultation for the purposes of procrastination. A commitment to consult on “the process by which a trans person can obtain legal recognition” can only make trans people and their allies sigh at the thought of repeating themselves again without being heard. The SNP tolerated, and still do tolerate, transphobes in their ranks. While it is nice to hear that they are “committed to tackling transphobia”, transgender people and their allies could be forgiven for judging the party on its actions rather than its platitudes.

Nicola Sturgeon asked us to judge her on her education record. Six years later and the record is dismal. The attainment gap is still very much with us. The pledge to recruit 3,500 educators needs to be understood in context. In 2007, there were 55,089 teachers in Scotland. Today there are 53,400 . And note, the promise is for 3,500 teachers and classroom assistants. It is not even, necessarily, an advance on the Tories’ plan to recruit 2,000 more teachers. The pledge to give every child a device is interesting and overdue. It allows us to catch up with Estonia. However, it is not remotely as important as reducing class sizes and dealing with the serially incompetent Scottish Qualifications Authority. Finally, what good are bikes for all children of school age when the road budget dwarfs the active travel budget and there is no safe cycling infrastructure?

The SNP has form for talking a good game. Sometimes that is better than doing nothing good at all (see Westminster) but it can be disappointing. Nicola Sturgeon has discussed the well-being economy but her government’s policies remain entrenched in the ideology that Jason Hickel calls Growthism. The manifesto mentions a Minimum Income Guarantee and a four day week. Please put more weight on the verbs than the nouns – the commitments are to “begin” and “explore” these policies. Basically, don’t expect either to happen any time soon.

Still, credit needs to be given where credit is due. A funding increase for the NHS of 20%, even over five years, would represent the biggest cash injection the service has seen since the 2008 financial crisis. Abolishing dental charges will encourage a lot of hard-up people to see a dentist when previously that would have been a scary prospect. It continues the universalism in the SNP’s approach to public services: scrapping dental charges works for the same reasons that scrapping prescription charges works.

This manifesto is sincere in its attempts to tackle poverty. Best Start grants ranging from £600 for a new born baby to £250 at the start of school and nursery will help the poorest Scots to cope in ways that are not available in the rest of the UK. Grants for young carers and a 13% increase in the carer’s allowance will ease the challenges for those with the most challenging family circumstances.

Amongst the many ridiculous claims that Douglas Ross has made, is one that the Scottish Government has been “very central belt-centric”. In reality, the SNP are first or second in every Holyrood constituency. The manifesto demonstrates why this is with a section that allows every voter to see what the party will do for their region. The offer of an Islands Bond – £50k to young people and families in order to stay on or move to an island community – will be the most tangible measure to address population decline in the islands in the history of the Scottish Parliament.

Pledges on rail and decarbonising homes feel like a watered-down version of the Greens’ policies in these areas. In fact, we might suspect that is the point.

There are many similarities with the Greens including a commitment to double the Scottish Child payment; to decarbonise homes; to decarbonise rail; to introduce free breakfasts and lunches for primary school pupils; to improve pay and introduce nationwide collective bargaining in the social care sector; to introduce land-based education in rural areas; to promote crofting; to close fox hunting ban loopholes; to ban the sale of peat-based garden products; to provide free bus travel for all Scots under 22 years of age. It does not matter which party came up with these ideas: they are good ideas. It is interesting that no Green candidate has ruled out coalition.

The commitment to hold an independence referendum once the pandemic is over makes for sensible and mature politics. I look forward to the insensible and immature response of the Alba Party. Independence remains front and centre for the SNP – and it will be important to clarify that when some, inevitably, attempt to claim that the Scottish people did not vote for a second referendum after the SNP win this election. The manifesto is clear in its opposition to Trident – something that has always made the SNP preferable to the Labour Party.

The manifesto represents the SNP’s last fourteen years in government: better than others but could be bettered by others. The messaging might be good: that does not mean the reality will be.

Best Policy: Let’s cheat and say “universalism”. The SNP’s greatest achievement in fourteen years has been to consistently remove means testing from Scottish people’s lives. The party understands that services are best provided as economies of scale from general taxation. Do not underestimate how much providing two free meals per school day and abolishing dental charges will improve the lives of Scotland’s poorest families. If you don’t believe me, ask Marcus Rashford.

Worst Policy: Freezing income tax and bands. While no party (so far) has promised to increase income tax, ruling it out – especially ruling out changing bands – will disproportionately benefit the highest earners. It will also limit what Kate Forbes, or any future Finance Minister, could do in the event of unforeseen economic circumstances in 2024 or 2025.

Weirdest Policy: “A joint UK and Ireland bid for the 2030 World Cup”. You have to wonder what the thinking was behind this one. Let’s support independence by delivering a unionist’s wet dream? Where will the final be held? I’ll give you a clue: it won’t be in Belfast, Glasgow, Dublin or Cardiff.

 

 

Comments (18)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Pub Bore says:

    The idea that the Scottish government will ‘use’ citizens assemblies to discuss council tax is emblematic of where the sovereignty of an independent Scotland will lie.

    Citizens assemblies should be setting the political agenda and ‘using’ the Scottish government to implement the general will that emerges from their deliberations. That would be popular sovereignty.

    But not to worry, eh? All that can be sorted out after the event, once the Scottish government has been fully empowered through Independence.

    1. Dougie Blackwood says:

      Independence will remove the imperative to vote for indy supporting parties and we really can have a proportionally elected rainbow parliament that has to listen to the voters.

      That is what I want in an independent Scotland. I liked it when Tommy Sherridan introduced and got through the abolition of warrant sales. Some of his policies were mince but that doesn’t preclude good ideas.

      1. Pub Bore says:

        Well, if the system’s so great, why don’t we have a more diverse and independent parliament now?

        The SNP’s dominance over the past 14 years surely gives the lie to the claim that the current system prevents any particular interest from capturing power and, in the ‘normal’ politics of an ‘independent’ Scotland, would ‘naturally’ produce a rainbow parliament. And surely the current ‘running dog’ strategy of the myriad sects on the left is premised on the (vain?) hope that, after Scotland leaves the Union, they will be able to use the system to capture enough power in its ‘wee’ parliament to further their various ‘revolutionary’ interests.

        No; the SNP’s paltry commitment to community empowerment, which is evident in its tokenistic nod to citizen assemblies, indicates that the Scottish people will be no more independent after Independence than they are now.

        1. Dougie Blackwood says:

          See my previous reply.

          1. Axel P Kulit says:

            No politician likes community empowerment. It means ceding power

          2. Pub Bore says:

            Aye, I did see it. You’re waving ‘Independence’ as if it were a magic wand.

          3. Dougie Blackwood says:

            Do you think it’s a mistake?

          4. Pub Bore says:

            No, I think it’s a fraud. You and I will be no more independent after Independence than we are now. We’ll just be under new management.

    2. Wul says:

      Yeah, exactly.

      Reminds me of what happened in local authority Community Development.

      It went from listening to local people say what was important to them and assisting them to organise change, to running glossy, one-off “consultation” events where architects drawings and CGI photographs of “What-we-are-going-to-do-regardless-of-what-you-think” were on show.

      Eventually they just left it to us plebs to try to replicate actual local government via Development Trusts, Buy Outs, Asset Transfers etc. (which they wilfully obstruct)

      The centralisation of power is a ball and chain on everyone’s creativity and energy. And the SNP do love centralising.

      1. Pub Bore says:

        Yep, I worked in community development for many years before my retirement. It was soul-destroying! Just as soon as a community had developed the capacity to effect some positive change in its neighbourhood, ‘big’ government would move in as ‘consultants’ and ‘facilitators, take control, and marginalise the local activists again, who, having lost the initiative as the driving force of the change they wanted to effect, quickly became demotivated.

        I reckon the ‘community development’ function of government, rather than empower them to do things for themselves, is designed to keep people firmly in their place.

  2. Alice says:

    With you there Pub Bore ….Citizen Assemblies are a major part of the way forward for folk to be involved in every part of policy development and implementation. I could become a very boring Citizen Assembly ‘going on about it ‘person but I really don’t care. Now Scotland has the absolute jist of it and they won’t let go! Onwards and Forwards.

  3. Squigglypen says:

    Why vote SNP?…simples…..Scots looking after Scots in their own land. ….just like other countries all over the planet and they don’t get called nationalists..Johnson continues to call the SNP…the Scottish Nationalist Party in Westminster. (The Speaker eventually intervened..didn’t make any difference. He wouldn’t apologise.)
    Focus on self determination for our nation….time to get away from the crap in Westminster and their brown tongue quisling representatives creeping about this side of the border.You have to wonder about their hidden agenda…ermine trimmed gown?…gong with pension.?..and you get to curtsey to that German family who sneakily changed their german name to that of an English castle so they wouldn’t get kicked oot.
    No government is perfect… one day the SNP will be voted out- BY THE SCOTS ….but it will be us who decide and not some foreign party south of our border with hidden links to financial support from aristocrats /royalty and others with hidden agendas that keep us prisoner in this toxic union…..
    Focus folks….INDEPENDENCE…now listen to me…INDEPENDENCE…now listen to me..INDEPENDENCE…..It really is time.

  4. florian albert says:

    ‘Worst Policy; freezing income tax’

    If you are assessing policies on the basis of attracting votes, this is a very good policy. (As opposed to a promise to ‘close hunting ban loopholes.)
    One of the last acts of the outgoing SNP government was to commit to a council tax freeze.
    Both a council tax and income tax freeze demonstrate the the SNP has no intention of making the better off pay to create a more equal Scotland. Middle class voters
    will note this and – I regret to predict – reward the SNP with their votes.
    Egalitarian talk and actions which reinforce the unequal status quo are the hallmarks of Nicola Sturgeon’s SNP.

  5. Adrian Roper says:

    I’m a Bella supporting English immigrant to Wales, whose gone native/nationalist, whilst remaining a left wing internationalist.
    I think the SNP has done an amazing job.
    It deserves its popularity, and I hope it gets a whopping majority backed by lots of Greens too.
    Is it fixing everything quickly enough?
    No.
    Who could better?
    No one.
    Is it hiding from unpopular climate change policy decisions?
    Probably.
    Who could do better?
    Well, obviously, the Greens, but then they have a simpler strategic intent.
    If you are trying to win independence, offering drastic cuts to consumerism and growth at the same time is tricky.
    I’d give the SNP a bit of slack on this, but with the Greens usefully biting their ankles.
    Why vote SNP?
    Independence.
    Why independence?
    Because the UK project has always been predicated on English supremacy with imperial compensations. The empire has gone. What’s emerging is English supremacy with no compensations.
    Oh for a UK where the histories of Scotland and Wales and Ireland were taught throughout the whole “country”; where Scots, Gaelic and Welsh were recognised as British languages and their literatures appreciated in the UK-wide curriculum; where Scots and Welsh migrants to England didn’t find themselves feeling like second class inferiors and the butts of jokes and condescension.
    Devolution hasn’t led to these happy dreams coming true. It has been a peripheral thing that the English seem minded to shrug off and dismantle. Independence seems like the dignified option.
    Best get out, whilst/if you have the chance.

    Plus of course, as things in UK-land plummet towards a perpetual government of corruption and plutocracy, it would be SO WONDERFUL if Scotland said “fuck yous” and took its chances on another course.
    With Wales hopefully following just behind.
    Maybe England too.
    Lots of brilliant comrades and kin in England.
    Good fences make good neighbours.

  6. Robert says:

    “The SNP tolerated, and still do tolerate, transphobes in their ranks.” You’ll have some evidence to back up that slur?

    1. Robert says:

      (Why did my earlier comment mysteriously disappear?)

    2. Alec Lomax says:

      I suspect the writer has mistaken the SNP for ALBA.

  7. lawrenceab says:

    Bella, why no coverage of Alba’s manifesto?

    It’s crisp, well written and clearly differentiated from the other offerings, adding a new voice: on the need for a more ambitious economic recovery programme, on women’s rights, on EEA/EFTA as first step back to the Single Market, and of course on the absolute need for urgency to kick off independence talks.

    Alba have some leading feminist figures in its ranks, more members than the LibDems, a raft of councillors, more MPs than Scottish Labour. They have shown they are serious and look set fair to win a few MSP seats. For Bella Caledonia to support the MSM media blackout against Alba is shameful.

    I hope to read some analysis here at least as detailed as given to the Unionists’ manifestos.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.