2007 - 2021

The EIS and the Scottish Green Legacy over the Israel-Palestine Teaching Resource

The Israeli land grab

The EIS and the Scottish Green party adhere to John Swinney’s education legacy over the Israel-Palestine Teaching Resource.

Following the recently heralded announcement of the cooperation agreement between the Scottish Green party and the Scottish government, they published their Draft Shared Policy Programme which outlined a visionary aspiration on key principles including human rights and education reform:

“…where everyone’s contribution is heard and valued and where improving children and young people’s outcomes is at the heart of everything we do… [and] support constructive and progressive discussion and debate on education matters in the Scottish Parliament and wider society”

But there was one exception to that admirable statement which both parties ignored and Scotland’s teachers’ union, the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) papered over; the Palestine and Israel, Understanding the Conflict teaching resource.

In 2015 a school in North Lanarkshire issued a homework exercise to pupils which consisted of various questions on why Palestinians are, ‘terrorists’.  Such was the reaction from parents, the Scottish Palestine community and national news coverage, the then Minister for Learning and Science, Dr Alasdair Allan, commissioned the Glasgow and Clyde Rights-Based Learning Group (GCRBL) to formulate a more balanced teaching resource.

GCRBL, with the support of Education Scotland, invited various stakeholder groups to engage in a consultative role in the development of the resource comprising educational professionals (including Education Scotland); parents and pupils; groups from Palestinian and Jewish communities and pro-Palestine and pro-Israel organisations.

While most of the stakeholders, including Scottish Jews for a Just Peace, recommended alterations to the resource, they advocated its implementation into Education Scotland’s GLOW website. This was done in February 2017 after being quality assured and was then accessible to teachers.

In May 2017, Education Scotland documented the response from the Scottish Council of the Jewish Communities (SCoJeC) who, along with the Scottish Friends of Israel, were the only stakeholders totally opposed to it.

Among the reasons for their opposition was the fear of anti-Semitism being generated in schools; a bias towards the Palestine perspective and a belief that sources such as the UN were, ‘unreliable’.  They rejected the opportunity to recommend additions/amendments to the resource which would reflect their own narrative and instead pursued a more lobbying tactic when John Swinney became education secretary in 2016.

His first task was to instruct Education Scotland to establish a Review Group comprising of Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland, teacher unions, local authorities and chaired by Vicky McGraw of the GCRBL.  Its function was to review the draft material and to arrange a piloting scheme in a number of selected schools.

However, the Review Group was soon discontinued after Education Scotland, without informing stakeholders, took the resource off GLOW.

Alarmed by this unexplained action and lack of transparency, one of the stakeholders, the Scottish Friends of Palestine, embarked upon a series of FOI requests which revealed that content of the resource had been removed after Swinney had meetings with pro-Israel groups.

Having met up with Swinney at a SNP conference I asked him to explain the future of the resource and received a duplicitous response enquiring if I was “from the Jewish or Palestine side?”

The resource was finally abandoned when the CEO of Education Scotland, Gayle Gorman, announced that there would be no further development of it.  Again, I managed to catch up with Swinney and asked him, how would teachers now answer questions by pupils on this issue? He stated that, “There are plenty resources that a teacher can properly construct an explanation of the Israeli/Palestine situation…I cannot believe a teacher is just waiting for Education Scotland to produce a resource pack if it helps them explain the situation”.

This response negated the reason why a resource was needed in the first place at the school in North Lanarkshire and contradicted the earlier decision made by Dr Alasdair Allan MSP and as well as the work by Education Scotland since June 2015. After nearly four years, Swinney completed a circle.

However, Swinney’s decision was mitigated when the EIS took an unprecedented step by offering and agreeing to take ownership of a Scottish government education resource.  What was ostensibly an educational rescue and promotion turned out to be a relegation into near oblivion as the resource is now buried on the EIS website.  The EIS advised me that they have no intention of seeking its reinstatement on GLOW.

Interestingly, that agreement took place during the height of pay negotiations with Swinney.

This controversy added to the litany of Swinney’s education failures culminating in a vote of no confidence in Holyrood last year.  During the debate, the Scottish Green party’s spokesperson for education, Ross Greer MSP, defended Swinney and accused opponents of ‘hypocrisy’.  However, a year later Nicola Sturgeon added to this loss in confidence when she demoted Swinney away from education.

Since Greer was convener of the Cross-Party Group on Palestine, it was hypocritical that he and the Greens refused to take a golden opportunity of demanding from Swinney the re-establishing of the teaching resource before voting.  As a constituent of Ross Greer, I wrote to him seeking an explanation.  Despite reminders, he refused to reply.  When I complained to the parliamentary Presiding Officer, Ken Macintosh, I was informed that MSPs are not obliged to answer, ‘political’ questions from constituents.

The current coalition agreement between the Scottish Green party and the Scottish government has again ignored the issue.

The incumbent secretary for education, Shirley-Anne Somerville, reiterated that objective research into historical issues can be overruled by individual stakeholders, “Significant efforts to facilitate the development of a set of resources on understanding the conflict in Israel and Palestine that could be agreed by all key stakeholders were undertaken and unfortunately it did not prove possible to seek full agreement on the content. It was decided that hosting the material on GLOW in these circumstances would be inappropriate.”

The decision to withdraw the resource was not based on educational criteria but political.  Will education in Scotland have to go through political lobbying before it attains legitimacy and acceptance?  That is why an objective approach is crucial and if we don’t have one, teachers will inevitably be forced to search the internet taking them back to the imbroglio at the school in North Lanarkshire.

The issue is still ongoing as the Scottish parliament is presently considering a petition for the resource to be reinstated.

The history of the Israel and Palestine conflict goes back over 100 years and is still as controversial today as it was then.  Britain was fundamentally responsible for this ongoing catastrophe and in particular the protagonist, a Scot by the name of Arthur James Balfour.

Scottish pupils should know about this.

Help to support independent Scottish journalism by subscribing or donating today.

 

Comments (2)

Leave a Reply to SleepingDog Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Dougie Harrison says:

    I agree John, that this issue should be reinstated so that school pupils are able to understand better some of the complex historical issues concerned. The role of the UK state in encouraging both the Palestinian people, AND Jews seeking to re-establish what some in their number considered ‘their’ ancient homeland, to believe that both aspirations could be resolved without any conflict, was duplicitous. Alas, there are occasions when it’s simply not possible to create a ‘win-win’ outcome, when history has so trampled on the rights of one of the contesting parties. Someone inevitably is the loser. The maps at the head of your article illustrate the present outcome.

    It was not until the 1970s that two very brave young socialists, George Galloway (aye, that’s the one; he did some good when he was younger), and my old comrade and friend Bill Speirs first raised the issue in our labour and trades union movement. If my memory serves me right yet, Dundee was ‘twinned’ with Nablus in Palestine in consequence, and understanding of the tortured history of the Palestinian people at last began to be better understood in Scotland.

    It’s a tragedy that only fifty years later, at least some of this progress is being reversed. The numbers on the Petition to our parliament to which you refer, are tragically low. It’s time the issue was re-raised again on the Scots left. Your piece is part of that John, so thank you.

  2. SleepingDog says:

    So, if there are groups in Scotland who are actively lobbying politicians, and are pushing a view that a land grant from God from the mists of mythology is more reliable than the considered deliberations of the United Nations, and support an apartheid state (as some Israeli organizations have recognized), then surely the Scottish authorities should be investigating these groups for extremist ideologies? As I have commented recently, the division of the peoples of the world into the elect and the damned (which seems pretty common in Abrahamic sects including Protestant and Catholic churches currently operating in Scotland) is surely the most extreme, most obvious, most belligerent, most dangerous, most irrational of worldviews possible. The threat to Scottish schoolchildren seems come more from pro-Zionism than anti-Semitism, and of course the unconstrained war of zealots against democracy, which also comes from Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist (and so on) factions round the world.

    But then, Christian organizations would get uneasy at the prospect of the label of extremism coming ever closer to their own doctrines. Not such a great vote winner, even now. For all the sectarianism, history would suggest that competing religous orders tend to close ranks and temporarily bury hatchets in the face of the common threat of secularism, atheism and the planetary-realist ideologies we need to resolve the world’s problems. But if there are religious organizations that support open society and pluralism, defer to appropriate civil and scientific authority, and want to resolve our problems peacefully, they have to really make their voices heard and be prepared to incisively criticise and expose the harmful ideologies and wrongdoings their co-religionists.

    A valuable article, and another potential blow to the credibility of the political party system; worth checking to see what emerges.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.