In Scotland, the Nationalists will Sweep the Board, but which ones?

IN SCOTLAND, THE NATIONALISTS WILL SWEEP THE BOARD – BUT WILL IT BE THE ENGLISH NATIONALISTS, OR THE SCOTTISH ONES?

We can only imagine it must have been something of a heartsink moment for Anas Sarwar. His London leader, Sir Keir Starmer, had sworn undying fealty to the cross of St George and everything it represents in, of all papers, the doggedly right wing Sunday Telegraph. ‘Labour must not flinch at flying the flag of St George – it is the patriotic party now’ he puffed, speaking off his ‘great pride and gratitude to be English.’ The English Defence League couldn’t have put it better.

Asked how such a triumphalist sentiment might go down in Motherwell, Lochgelly, or Dundee, a grim-faced Labour spokesman spluttered ‘Jings, Crivvens, and help ma boab’. I paraphrase slightly, but that probably just about sums it up. Meanwhile that dyspeptic old Scotophobe, Samuel Johnson, might well have reverted to his thoughts on patriotism as the last refuge of the scoundrel, an aphorism later appropriated by Oscar Wilde. 

So what gives, now that the game’s afoot (as Shakespeare – born on St George’s Day – has it). The Curtice calculus is that Labour is on course to pick up 35 Scottish seats, against the SNP’s 11, so that would seem to be the tartan vote in the bag, then. The focus must now be on Brexit-inclined ‘red wall’ constituencies like Burnley, in the English north west, where five of the party’s ten target seats are located. That explains why Sir Keir, when not wrapping himself in the St George’s flag, stands at a podium flanked by two Union Jacks.

So might the Labour Party and its advisers, drunk on optimism for now, be unwisely counting their unhatched chickens? Put another way, might one or two fair scunnert Scottish voters be toying with the idea of sending Sir Keir and his troops homeward, to think again? The ‘in the bag’ prediction hardly represents fresh thinking. Two years have passed since Labour adviser John McTernan tweeted ‘kind of the First Minister to gift Labour Scottish seats at the next general election.

Admittedly, there was endless turmoil in SNP ranks during the twilight days of the Sturgeon regime, and there would be more turmoil to follow under the ill-starred Humza Yousaf interregnum, but some take the view that the newly established Swinney-Forbes alliance could yet rescue the party from total oblivion. This is a hopeful prospect, perhaps, and the First Minister’s (possibly misplaced) loyalty to beleaguered former health secretary Michael Matheson may not have been such a wise move, but the SNP is undoubtedly in a better place than it was. It still anticipates losing seats, and Alex Salmond’s Alba party might weaken its performance, but the question is, how many seats?

We are, off course, operating in an ever-changing political landscape. For one thing, in a comic attempt to throw sand in our eyes and distract us from his disastrous economic record, Rishi Sunak has come up with the oxymoronic term ‘mandatory volunteering’ in the context of the re-introduction of National Service. Teenagers, it seems, are a sort of national enemy needing press-ganged into some form of forced labour, military or otherwise. The thinking is that this will appeal to the Daily Mail blue rise brigade, and thus retain their Tory-voting loyalty. 

They forget that National Service was abandoned in the 1960s for the simple reason that professional military types were fed up being exploited as baby sitters for bored teenagers. A pal of my uncle’s claimed the benefits for him amounted to learning a lot of new card games and catching up on his reading, with the occasional foray through wet bracken in outer Wester Ross on the way to some remote pub. One doubts the nation was any more secure as a result.

As appeals to the heart go, flirting with patriotic tropes doesn’t always guarantee a political payback. In 2008 Gordon Brown decided it was a good idea to fly the flag of St George above Downing Street. A year earlier he had ordered that the Union Flag should fly permanently from public buildings ‘to encourage a stronger sense of shared national purpose.’ In addition, mindful of his holidays in Cape Cod, where the stars and stripes was a regular feature on many American suburban porches, he suggested we should all plant flagpoles in our garden and run up the flag of the union to promote British values of ‘liberty, a sense of responsibility, and fairness.’ 

No one seems to have told him that in some parts of post-Culloden Scotland some still refer to it as ‘the Butcher’s Apron,’ while a lady in York – yes, York! – who objected to being patronised threatened to fly a black bin bag instead. Tom Nairn duly dubbed the incoming Prime Minister ‘The Bard of Britishness’ and quoted Bertold Brecht’s ironic idea that where the public fail to be compliant with the state’s wishes the government should ‘dissolve the people and elect another.’ 

For Scotland’s nationalists, such unfettered displays of bombastic English nationalism offer an opportunity which they would be foolish to miss. If leaflets bearing caricatures of Sir Keir wrapped in the flag which England shares with Greece and Catalonia were to be posted through every letter box in Motherwell, Lochgelly, and Dundee, one can only wonder what the outcome might be?

 

Comments (7)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published.

  1. SteveH says:

    Just a thought, or two.

    Starmer, like Sunak have changed their messaging a bit to try to counter the rise of Reform UK. Speaking to a couple of Reform supporters, on of whom turns out to be ex Labour, the other ex-Tory. They said the “One-Nation” Tories and the typical(?) Labour graduates have more in common with the Liberal Democrat’s then they do their party. Neither party are true to their political heritage. They are so-called centrists who drive wildly across both lanes of the carriage way, but both tend to veer to the left when left to their own devices, and not influenced by their fear of not getting into power.

    Starmer’s sudden love of the Union Flag is to make sure he’s not mistaken for anti-English/British. Which would confirm to some he is not fit to govern. Being less patriotic than Richard Tice or Nigel Farage is not a good look.

    On another note.

    As someone with both Scottish and Norman blood in me, and having a distant family member at Bannock Burn on the fateful two days of battle, I’m able to have an interested, yet dispassionate view of that battle. I understand it in the context of the day. We all know that The Bruce was as much a landowning English Lord as well as a Scottish one. We also know he didn’t have a problem selling out Wallace.

    So, when I read your passing thought about Culloden, and the “butcher’s apron”, I thought am I reading about an historical reference designed to criticise the English? Of course I know that I cannot read your mind, yet I do know that there were more Scots fighting against Charles than there were English. They had the discipline of the English regiments, and the fighting spirit of Scotland. Charlie and the Clans never stood a chance. So, it as mostly a Scottish affair, with some Scots preferring the economic and politically stable union with England & Wales.

    You know, I’m still trying to understand if the Scottish independence movement is really a romantic desire for return to everything Scottish, or a pragmatic attempt to disentangle Scotland from a currently politically dysfunctional Union. Or perhaps, a combination of these two things, plus a total belief in a form of Scottish Marxism?

    You (the movement) need to work out what you really are before you make Scotland do anything really drastic, like making a lasting decision on whether to leave, or to stay in the Union.

    1. John says:

      Stevie H – where do you live?
      I am asking because despite ‘having Scottish and Norman blood in you’ (have you had a blood transfusion recently?) you (& your Reform pals) appear to know SFA about Scottish politics.

    2. Frank Mahann says:

      The Norman yoke. Some of your ancestors have a lot to answer for.

  2. Jeel says:

    How many will fall for the latest Brit fad/fashion?
    As many did with Blair’s & even Thatcher’s.

  3. Wul says:

    I feel a very deep sense of betrayal towards Keir Starmer. Initially I could not believe the number of times he let the Tories off the hook in parliament. Time after time, he could have roasted them to hell on their abysmal performance, cruelty and corruption. And he said nothing.

    He’s meant to lead His Majesty’s Opposition. He is meant to be the hope for voters who are not represented by the government of the day. But he has opposed nothing. Zilch. Instead, he is offering us an “Iron clad” version of the worst of Thatcherism. More poverty, more austerity, more privatisation, more genocide, more toxic “growth” (we won’t get growth , not with iron-clad austerity), more exploitation of low-paid workers, more shit in the rivers.

    An actual party of social change could win overwhelming support from voters. Everybody is sick of the same old, same old. Without PR at Westminster we will never get anywhere near being a democratic country.

    1. John says:

      Agree entirely with your last sentence about PR.
      FPTP usually means that a number of marginal constituencies in middle England decides outcome of UK election. This inevitably leads to the major parties targeting their policies to attract the voters in these key constituencies. The remainder of electorate are effectively ignored.
      FPTP also means that a change of 10% in vote can give a party an overwhelming majority at top end and virtually no seats at bottom end of range as the Westminster elections in Scotland have demonstrated. This is an outcome that in no way reflects the votes of electorate.
      Lastly FPTP encourages voters to often vote against what they dislike most rather than for their real preference.
      It suits the Tories primarily andLabour are happy to go along with it to get their turn in power.

      1. John says:

        I should add that the unwillingness of the major parties to upset the voters who really matter under FPTP is the complete absence of debate about the elephant in the room – Brexit and how to move forward and improve the UK’s relationship with EU to the economic and cultural benefit of UK citizens. I don’t often agree with Michael Heseltine but he is spot on in calling out this election as being phoney in ignoring Brexit.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.