It’s Joever, now what?

So Joe Biden is out and there’s a huge battle within the Democratic party about what happens next, there’s also lots of questions about Biden’s legacy and how to beat Trump. While many have endorsed Kamala Harris, there are several key missing supporters, notably Barack Obama who is arguing for an open convention to decide the nomination. Some think that would be a disastrous open conflict that would undermine the candidate, others argue such a process would give the candidate much-needed authority.

There’s also the question of Biden’s reputation and legacy.

The American writer Osita Nwanevu has said: “The paeans being written to the heroism and courage of Biden are extraordinary ⁠– it’s rare to see history being so quickly and blatantly rewritten. The truth is that today marks the end of one of the more shameful and ridiculous sagas in American presidential politics ⁠– a crisis made and extended by the fecklessness and inertia of the Democratic party as an institution and the bullheadedness of a man who should have understood his own limits and the risks a re-election campaign would pose to the country years ago.”

“For weeks they charged ahead, questioning the integrity of their critics and ignoring all contrary data until Biden’s position became fully untenable. And one has to wonder now the extent to which their behavior has been reflective of how this administration has handled substantive policy matters behind the scenes, perhaps most especially the war in Gaza, which Biden has backed with an implacability that has baffled and troubled even experts who’ve become accustomed to American deference to Israel. Well before June’s fateful debate, that war fundamentally tarnished what might have been remembered, on the basis of Biden’s domestic policy record, as a respectable and even transformative presidency. Unavoidably now, Biden’s arrogance and solipsism will be part of his story.”

This is true, and also raises the question of – if he’s not fit to run for office, is he fit to govern? This is reminiscent of the old Cold War-era Soviet Union with elderly leaders turning up for set-piece events before returning into obscurity.

America, and the west, does face an existential threat in Trump, but the alternatives have to be better than continuity liberalism. Some of this sounds oddly familiar.

Comments (3)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published.

  1. Cathie Lloyd says:

    You say it well. Does the future lie with compromise even if it extends to genocide?

  2. Alasdair Macdonald says:

    I have an acquaintance who is a US citizen. Whenever the Republicans seem to be in the ascendant he says that the reaction of the ‘progressive’ groups is to form a circular firing squad and start shooting each other. I think we have an example of this here.

    1. John says:

      In this particular instance is it not more a case of one stubborn old man not accepting he is too old?
      Most of the Democratic Party have been telling him to go and they seem to be rallying round Kamala Harris. Let’s hope it is not too late.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.