Vice-Signalling and the Omnicause

Responses to the seizure of the Freedom Flotilla (Sailing Against the Tide) which included twelve volunteers (including Greta Thunberg) were predictable. From around the strange brew that is Britain’s right-wing media came a cacophony of derision from all the usual voices.

Leading the charge, of course, was Piers Morgan, who seems instantly and deeply triggered by Greta. Many used the phrase, copied from the Israeli authorities of the ‘Selfie Yacht’.

In the Telegraph Suzanne Moore thundered (‘Hypocritical Greta ignores the irony that she wouldn’t be tolerated by Hamas‘):

“Thunberg, like so many of her generation wrapped up in their made-in-China keffiyehs, are not interested in the specifics of this conflict.”

I wonder what specifics Moore means?

She continues with maximum derision:

“This is what happens when a young girl with a penchant for protest becomes too feted.”

I mean, to describe one of the most influential figures of a generation as having a ‘penchant for protest’ is just ridiculous, but Moore is just getting into her stride:

“Unsurprisingly, then, her symbolic power was soon commodified as she appeared at protest after protest, morphing effortlessly from climate change activism to Palestinian solidarity.”

This is one of the rights familiar tropes about Greta Thunberg, that she has ‘commodified’ protest and is getting rich.

She goes on: “Political activism is now algorithmic. Hey, if you liked that cause, then try this one.
*
The “Left” these days often seems little more than a collection of disparate causes: eco stuff, trans rights and Free Palestine. The contradictions between these beliefs are underplayed as they become bundled together as an omnicause. I first heard that word used in 2023. The omnicause can incorporate everything from animal rights to emptying the jails. Forget the single issues that require specific, often boring campaigning: the omnicause is a moronic vacuum where analysis goes to die.”

*
The Omnicause, it’s a favourite phrase of the far-right, used by Wings Over Scotland and others to paper over the cracks of their own incomprehension.
What it means, of course, is that people are making common cause across struggles and seeing the connections between settler colonialism, racism, imperialism and the omnicidal disasters of late capitalism. They are joining the dots. This is good. This is essential. This is about solidarity and breaking out of the silo of your single issue. That it provokes mass incomprehension amongst middle-aged scribes and bloggers is odd, but inconsequential.
“What did Fossil Free Books achieve, for instance?” continues Moore [oh ffs – Ed]
*
“It decided to campaign against companies that had any connection to Israel. The result was that investment firms such as Baillie Gifford stopped funding book festivals. How this helped either the environment or indeed the Palestinian cause is something of a mystery.”
*

The default setting for these journos is “do nothing like me!”. Any action, any protest of whatever kind is derided as ‘performative’ – ‘it will have no impact’ – ‘it won’t change anything.’ It’s a recipe for mass inertia. Their slogan is “Do Nothing. Everything’s Fine. Buy the Telegraph”.

Moore concludes: “The omnicause burns itself out in the end because it has no actual strategy. It simply signifies tribal loyalty. It gobbles everything up and spits out its participants, who simply move on to the next “wrong” thing.” Yeah, let’s put genocide in inverted commas Suzanne.
*
Also in the Telegraph, Stephen Daisely has his say and comes to remarkably similar conclusions, bellowing: ‘The Greta photo that exposes the hollowness of Leftie activism‘. He writes: “Thunberg and her fellow passengers aboard the MV Madleen, the boat which tried to run the naval blockade of Hamas-run Gaza, have been now taken into custody by the Israeli navy.”
*
I’m not sure Daisey has seen Gaza recently, but the idea that it is ‘Hamas-run’ is extraordinary. He continues: “There are ways to deliver aid to the Gaza Strip – they do not involve Instagram selfies,” the Israeli ministry of foreign affairs said. (Even more cattily, the ministry’s statement referred to Thunberg and her chums as “celebrities”, enclosing the word in deliciously bitchy quotation marks.)”
Brilliant.

He closes with the sinister: “Greta Thunberg should be grateful to the IDF for their care and professionalism in ensuring her publicity stunt ended in sandwiches and not fatalities.”

Citing MAGA Senator Joni Ernst, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and Tory MSP Murdo Fraser, Neil Mackay identifies the phenomenon we’re witnessing here as ‘vice-signalling’ whereby you display how bad and edgy you are by making awful statements about the world: “Think of virtue-signalling in reverse, whilst wearing Darth Vadar’s helmet.”

There’s a connection between what you call ‘vice-signalling’ and the sort of sneering contemptuous journalism that attacks anyone doing anything about anything, most of which is contempt for younger people.

It’s worth noticing that there are three primary triggers for the sort of rage expressed here by Moore, Daisley and Morgan but also routinely expressed by the likes of Stuart Campbell, Alex Massie, Iain Macwhirter (here’s a doozy), and others.

First is doing anything. Anything at all. Although they dress up their outrage as about tactics (‘throwing soup!’) they don’t really care about what tactics anyone uses. It is doing something they hate, either because it punctures the reality of their own culpability or it shatters their ignorant entitlement, or both.

Second is young people. Young people are stupid and naive and idealistic and to be derided at all times. Young women are, by definition, worse.

Third is the environment. There is nothing to sneer at more than young people caring about the environment. What fools.

The omnicause that these writers deride is actually an awakening that people are making as the crisis that converge manifest themselves in more and more awful forms and at greater and greater intensity.

What’s odd about these writers is their own lack of self-reflection about how the far-right operates. As the authors of the Post-Internet Far Right note: “We want to make clear that the far right is both a) massively diverse and b) almost completely contiguous (that is it’s possible to get from one part of it to another with relative ease). In this sense these writers are unable to reflect on what connects (for example) their various scribblings with expose their: racism, misogyny, Islamophobia, or their general inability to navigate the time we live in and their disastrous contribution to it.

Comments (1)

Leave a Reply to Margaret Brogan Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

  1. Margaret Brogan says:

    I thought that Wings Over Scotland was defunct! Iain MacWhirter, thought he had retired years ago!

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.