An hour of not feeling complicit in the genocide

Almost 500 people were arrested in London yesterday for holding placards supporting ‘Palestine Action’ which the UK government has declared a ‘terrorist organisation’ despite it never harming anyone. In theory, anyone holding such a placard could receive up to 14 years in prison. 

Those arrested at that ‘Defend our Juries’ protest included folk who had travelled down from Scotland. Meanwhile in Edinburgh, a group of 4 people sat with the same signs. 

This is one take on what happened:

*An hour of not feeling complicit in the genocide*

An hour of sitting quietly, with over a 100 folk gradually forming a circle round the 4 of us sitting on the concrete bollards with signs we wrote out at the start of the hour. 

Our signs read: 

“I oppose Genocide”

“I support Palestine Action”

(to which I added: “who harm no one, and try to protect life”).

The circle around us was a surprise, and was a really supportive presence, quieting into a deeply caring solidarity with those in Gaza: with all those children, women and men suffering the onslaught of genocide. 

I felt so moved that I ended up speaking at the end. 

I’m used to occasionally speaking at Quaker meeting, but not to standing on a bollard at the end of an hour long vigil. I only said a bit of what I had been moved to say. 

I thanked folk for coming and caring, for their supportive presence, for being here despite and because of their fury and grief at the Genocide that the state of Israel is wrecking on the people of Palestine. I then remembered:

“As we sat here in silence, a small girl ran between the trees, laughing and playing. She brought such joy to my heart.” 

“I was then engulfed in tears, thinking of the kids in Gaza being targeted and starved, their families destroyed and killed.”

I wanted to add that I am a Quaker and love sitting for an hour in silence in the presence of others who also care about the world. 

I wanted to add that it was strange to sit here in this oasis of calm – in this pedestrian square in front of the UK government building in Edinburgh -while the rest of the city is full of the deafening noise and impassable crowds of the festival. 

It was strange that a protest should be an oasis of peace. 

But now that the First Minister has named what’s happening as a genocide, will Scotland now boycott Israel? 

Will Scotland become an oasis of peace in a state that is complicit in genocide? Will our Government demand from the UK Labour government that it ends its active support for genocide? 

This UK government calls for a two- state solution, yet won’t recognise one of those states. 

It says it will only recognise Palestine in a month or so’s time, when there may be next to no Palestinians left in Gaza to recognise. And even then it will only recognise it if Israel is still murdering the remaining Palestinians in Gaza. 

What twisted soul would say such a thing? 

If you murder someone you go to jail. If you murder a whole people you are told you can continue but should stop at some time in the future when you’ve achieved your awful ends. 

I wanted to say all that, but all I said was that:

My placard says “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action, who harm no one and try to protect life”. 

“If you rip the roof off an arms factory or spray paint the war planes of a military power that is aiding a genocide, then of course you will be arrested and taken to court. Of course you will be tried. Hopefully by a jury of citizens who can decide whether your action was a proportionate, even if insufficient, response to the crime of genocide being committed. 

“But to label as terrorists, protestors who harm no one, who wish only for peace, is an outrageous denial of the truth. 

“To have tried to break up the work’s of factories making parts for gas chambers would have been illegal at the time, but would have been a moral and proper action.”

I ended my stint on the bollard by thanking folk for their solidarity with the Palestinian people expressed in such a powerful caring way. 

Afterwards, the police followed us and a young woman PC spoke to one of the four of us, saying: “Do you know that holding such a sign is an offence under section 13 of the Terrorism Act?”

After a pause, our comrade replied “What do you want me to say?” 

The PC then said “Will you give me your details?” and the answer was “No”, and the police left us in peace. 

It felt like, despite a large presence, maybe they were wanting to avoid arresting anyone, but you never know – time will tell. 

Janet Fenton, a friend who was in the larger circle, later said:

“It was amazing to see many people that I have known in such a disciplined and perfect circle, and I think the police had a very different (and disarming and discombobulating) experience than the one they were expecting. I hope that they don’t arrest you, and that Scotland can be at its best in this debate.

“I think the police were genuinely unsure of what was happening.” 

“Some of the kent faces in the circle of silence were operating in ways that the cops would be likely to find very uncharacteristic. I think that many of the cops up here personally share our views, although they are always far less sympathetic to Palestinian protest than people coming out on nuclear weapons or even migration.” 

“Maybe they had an idea that if they get the photos they can pick people up later without a riot in the Royal Mile during the Edfest.” 

“They were on their radios and talking to each other a lot, and it was interesting to see the numbers increasing. They were bound to have known we would be there, but maybe thought it would be much smaller and/or noisier. 

“I was just so delighted to see this kind of absolute and completely peaceful pushback, and so pleased that Mr Swinney has said the sensible sentence, and I would like to think that the Scottish Police don’t act on a proscription by the UK Government that the UN have condemned. I feel that there is a change contained in all of that.”

Here’s hoping, and here’s to all of us making that happen. 

After the brief interaction with the police, some of the 100 or so strong group of protestors quickly followed us and kindly asked if we wanted them all to accompany us to protect us, but we said no, we’d like to walk off quietly. Which we did. 

But I now wonder – having heard my friend’s analysis:

– Did the police not arrest us because there was also a crowd of folk, some of whom they apparently knew could become very agitated? 

– Did they not arrest us because it was a calm and peaceful occasion? Were they disorientated in a humanising way? 

– Or will they turn up in a moment, and fall in line with the crazy level of arrests in London?

We walked off quietly, as quietly as we had sat in the Square. 

We sat outside a cafe along with my partner, who had been providing support (alongside a long-time friend from Faslane), and a photographer from the movement. 

We sat amongst the anonymous Edinburgh crowds. 

I think we all felt – I certainly felt – a sense of real happiness. 

That was a good action – however inadequate. 

That was a good vigil – including being laced with occasional chanting and shouts by the wonderful flag-waving folk gathered in the wider circle, with the luminous jacketed police beyond them. 

It felt like we were an oasis of sanity in a world being devoured by a system gone mad. 

That system is inhuman and cares nothing for human life. We are human; we care. 

We – all who care – are seeking a way to recover our humanity, so we can watch the small kids laugh as they dance between the trees, without having to burst into tears. 

Comments (28)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Meg Macleod says:

    Who holds the government to account?

    1. Janet Fenton says:

      Meg MacLeod asks, who hold the Government to account?
      The answer in this case must be that WE DO!
      We elected them, albeit votes from Scotland, even en bloc, do not have sufficient weight to amount to a capacity to change policy. (The proportion of MPs in the UK Parliament from Scottish constituencies is only 9% of the total number of seats)
      And the so-called Secretary of State for Scotland, Mr Ian Murray, is not representing his own electorate, let alone the Scottish people.
      That is why it is tempting to consider the option of non violently making Scotland ungovernable by removing consent for immoral and internationally condemned actions for which the government does not have any mandate. The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has already instructed the UK Government that its actions in proscribing Palestine Action do not meet the internationally agreed criteria for charging people with terrorism. It is increasingly obvious that the people being arrested in this situation are not considered to be terrorists by the police or Scotland’s procurators fiscal, since chargees are being bailed to go home, or not charged at all after an initial arrest. This would not happen were there any serious likelihood that they are actually terrorists.
      Most of the Secretary of State for Scotland’s functions, following legislative devolution for Scotland in 1999 were transferred to the newly established Scottish Ministers. However, the Secretary of State is still expected to represent Scotland in the Cabinet of the United Kingdom on matters not devolved to the Scottish Parliament. We Scots have frequently been reminded of what these are, with Defence and National Security and elections to the UK Parliament firmly reserved to Westminster. The important and often neglected area of responsibility for the Secretary, which is to represent Scottish interests to the UK Government is vitally important. Ian Murray’s enthusiasm for his Ministerial post, and loyalty to the so-called Labour Government under Keir Starmer, may lie behind his lack of attention to the agreed rules-based order of International Humanitarian Law overseen by the United Nations. This may be in part because US President Trump, (and others) have confused their power of veto on the UN Security Council (The US insisted upon getting that at the UN get-go negotiations). The veto is not a right to disruption and uncooperative action instead of international efforts towards arbitration and the resolution of ideological differences. Their interpretation of it as allowing their own way at the international table is no more that destructive, irresponsible and uncooperative behaviour. The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has addressed the UK Government on the proscription of Palestine Action and pointed out the incompatibility and trivialising nature of the UK Terrorism Act. This requires attention which must be brought to it by all of us that can see its necessity and who hope for action to save Palestine and its people before it is too late. Scotland’s First Minister’s position that the actions taking place in Gaza constitute genocide is a welcome statement and as long as the Scottish people have no democratic process to address this problem they want his support and that of the Justice Minister in excusing the Scottish Police to uphold it, at least as a start. So Mr Murray must act as our advocate, and advise the UK Government accordingly and use his persuasive rhetoric to explain to the Department of Trade and Business that export licenses must be at the very least, be curtailed until the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is resolved.

      Note:
      In 1955 Scots constituencies numbered 71 seats out of Westminster’s 650, and 50% is 325. So Scots MPs would need support from at least 255 English MPs to get past the half way line.
      In 2024 with the reduced number, 57seats that are held by MPs representing Scottish constituencies the Scottish representative MPs would require the support of at least 269 supporters to change Government policy
      (While the Lords number of seats is variable, and did rise to well over 1000 in the 70s, normally there are only about 800 and a lot less than that show up and participate. However they are in a position to be able to kb decisions made in the Commons, a substantial proportion of them do not live in Scotland, and the very fact of an upper hereditary chamber gives a clue to their likely perspective on the human rights, colonialism, human migration, climate change and peace and disarmament policies.

      1. babs nicgriogair says:

        Well said, Janet !
        I can’t agree more.

    2. SleepingDog says:

      @Meg Macleod, a large swathe of policy is kept outside of parliamentary or public influence by the royal prerogatives of the British imperial quasi-Constitution, and our history shows that who ever is in government, our foreign, diplomatic, intelligence and military policies seem constant or at least unaffected by changes of government. The Labour Party in office has always been as imperial as the Conservatives or Liberals in office. The royal prerogatives confer sweeping immunities and allow parliaments to be bypassed by various means such as the Privy Council, secret courts, secret laws, secret evidence, secret committees and so on. Israel is one of the few other nations to have an uncodified constitution, which has allowed its intelligence and military institutions a much freer reign. And the British gave Israel its colonialist quasi-Constitution, and Israel uses draconian anti-democratic legislation from that time to crack down on media etc.

      If you want a government you can hold to account, we will need to change our political system first (a republic with a codified constitution would be a start, and maybe we could add something binding about opposing genocide and ecocide).

      I read a little about the Second Carib War today, something which could count as a genocide and certainly ethnic cleansing carried out by the British (with many Scots or Scots-descended at the forefront), against a people I believe are sometime known as the Garifuna. Perhaps that’s not a familiar name these days.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garifuna
      Our government seems to agree with Israel’s that the same or worse will happen to ‘Palestinians’. Although at least the Revolutionary French came to the assistance of the Garifuna, maybe even on some basis of principle and natural sympathy, I don’t know. I suppose as NATO’s not-so-secret ally, the Israeli regime considers itself untouchable.

      I have heard of people’s tribunals, such as the Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal which recently delivered a verdict against leading USAmerican weapons makers. Why is war and genocide so popular in the first place, though?

      1. SleepingDog says:

        On the last point about People’s Tribunals, I hear that there’s going to be an unofficial Gaza Tribunal, since the UK government refused “to establish an independent inquiry into UK involvement in Israeli military operations in Gaza, including the supply of weapons, surveillance aircraft and use of Royal Air Force bases.”
        https://thegazatribunal.uk/

  2. Alex Thomson says:

    Protesting peacefully is the way forward. Your commitment is appreciated.

  3. John says:

    I cannot help suspect that the government’s proscription of Palestine Action is in some way related to the fact that Palestine Action vandalised Trump’s golf course at Turnberry.

    1. Niemand says:

      Ha, who knows?

      Either way, it is clearly a massive mistake that brings nothing but dishonour to Labour. Idiotic, illogical and unjust thing to do. Sure, I get the plane vandalism thing but that has happened several times before and the groups responsible were never declared ‘terrorists’ and banned. Arresting 500 ordinary, decent people who just cannot stand by and say nothing about the atrocious actions of Israel is truly risible. Labour are going to seriously regret this as it is not going away. And talk about needlessly filling already full prisons with innocent people and taxing an already massive juducial backlog, Jesus H. Christ! And that is coming from someone who still has some residual support for Labour!

      1. John says:

        I agree with your sentiments about proscribing PA rather than just prosecuting any of their members who break the law using current legislation.
        I have read in Guardian this morning that Richard Dannatt, a member of House of Lords and adviser to a US Defence Company Teledyne, has been lobbying for the proscription of PA after their members caused damage at a factory in Wales in 2022.
        Whatever the reason behind it the government’s gross overreaction has alienated a large number of potential supporters and discredited their antiterrorism strategy which is supposed to be protecting the public from potential murderers not prosecuting large numbers of peaceful citizens. It has also set a dangerous precedent by lowering the bar on proscription of organisations and I shudder to think how any potential Reform government would use proscription to silence opponents.
        In short a completely dumb, self defeating action by the government.

        1. Niemand says:

          Yes and now hiding behind other ‘serious security concerns’ they won’t reveal. Are they bogus as many might think? Only one way to show they are not.

          1. SleepingDog says:

            @Niemand, and if/when the ‘secret intelligence’ is exposed and proved bogus? The British Crown has sovereign immunity, which generally extends to those on His/Her Majesty’s Service, like MI5. HM’s Ministers are broadly protected by the royal prerogative. Who will stand trial for fraud? Which heads will roll? What constitutional crisis will follow? But they’ve got away with so many crimes so many times already… which is kind of the point of Empire.

          2. John says:

            The government reply appears to be trust us. Do they not realise that saying ‘trust us’ without making the evidence public is one of the quickest ways to diminish further the public trust in government.
            If they had published all evidence on PA, debated and voted in government on PA alone (not bundled up with 2 other organisations) they wouldn’t have got themselves in the situation where a large part of population suspect they have proscribed PA for political reasons.

    2. John Monro says:

      You may well have a point, hadn’t thought of that. Starmer has certainly revealed himself as Trumpian toady, so perfectly possible. Much worse than spraying paint on aircraft involved in Israel’s assault on the Palestinians in Gaza. A ruined putt vs a 60,000 dead Palestinians, no contest really.

      1. John says:

        The sight of not only Starmer toadying to Trump but Lammy treating Vance like they are besties is pathetic . I understand the UK government has to deal with Trump administration but the way they personally demean themselves with their ingratiating supplicant behaviour is nauseating.

        1. Frank Mahann says:

          Lammy and Vance….pass the sick bag !

  4. John Monro says:

    Thanks for this uplifting article, whoever it was attended the vigil in central Edinburgh. The quiet circle or square of folk around you makes for a striking and welcome image. I have been attending a small vigil every Wednesday morning here in my little town of Martinborough in New Zealand pretty well all of 2024 and until now. I marched with the hundreds of thousands of others in London in October 2023, when visiting the UK to see family. Whilst quiet protest can seem like mere impotence on display, protest does help, it establishes a moral baseline when that moral baseline has been breached and I have been told by folk with knowledge to state this, that Palestinians do know that protests take place around the world, and this is so much appreciated.. There has been a noticeable increase in local support as people realise who is the aggressor in Gaza, initially we got quite a lot of vocal pushback from some local residents, not so much for a long time now. In the UK the Starmer regime has complicated matters by proscribing the protest group Palestine Action, but whilst there has been no proscription so far, our NZ government has done nothing in the face of this appalling and continuing crime and the crisis of the failure of Western claims to moral leadership. There was however a possible threat to free speech in regard to what was called “hate speech” legislation intended for draughting by Jacinda Ardern’s administration, following the horrible Christchurch massacre. This has now been abandoned, the feeling was it went too far and was unworkable. Prior legislation covers speech intended to cause harm, riot, violence etc.

    Perhaps folk reading here might be interested in a letter of mine published in our local paper a couple of months ago And I should mention and remind folk that our Australian cousins did protest proud in their march in the pouring rain over the Sydney Harbour Bridge. The vigil I attend here in Martinborough also takes place every week in every town small and big in New Zealand . We are here in NZ though as in the UK and elsewhere betrayed by a political establishment of cowardice and moral failure.

    Dear Editor

    For the last eighteen months some concerned Martinborough citizens have held a regular Wednesday morning vigil in support of the Palestinian people in Gaza, who have been subject by Israel to relentless bombardment amounting to a “plausible case of genocide” according the the International Court of Justice. Genocide or not, the deliberate and indiscriminate killing of tens of thousands of civilians, including women and children, ethnic cleansing, and deprivation of means of life – food, water, shelter, power and medical help – are undoubted war crimes, for which we trust Israel’s leaders and its military backers should ultimately be held accountable.

    We stand in front of the ANZAC War Memorial for its central location, its visibility and not for any political statement. We have been reassured by a noticeable increase in support from the passing public.

    Two weeks ago two obviously distressed middle aged men approached us expressing politely but forcefully their dismay at what they considered our disrespect for the Memorial and the soldiers commemorated there. One described how his own family had lost several members to war in the past. They believed there were many citizens in the town who felt the same way – however when we parted they acknowledged these soldiers fought for our freedoms, including that of dissent, and we thank them for that.

    During ANZAC Day we commemorate these soldiers’ ultimate sacrifice, but equally we remember so that we should never forget the folly of war . Our challenge then is “What is the point of remembering the folly of a war of generations ago if we ignore and fail to protest the folly of a war that is happening in front of our very eyes?”

    No-one in the face of today’s reality of war and violence around the world can be certain what those soldiers might say to us, but we do know that those who have experienced and survived war will usually be the most determined to oppose it.

    Those crosses in the grass in the square may be hallowed ground to New Zealanders and some may resent our presence nearby but we believe these crosses are telling us something supremely important; and that we are respecting this message every minute we stand where we do.

    In the fortnight since our two gentlemen approached us, the Israeli Defence Force has killed 518 Palestinians, including many children, the cumulative total of slaughtered children being over 18,000.

    Yours faithfully.

  5. Mechell][e Mouse says:

    Russian Fediration vs. Ukraine = untrendy war that doesnt involve so many Jews. Trendy religion = hijabi women forever. Get in the kitchen, dont stray out of the field, dont eat until the men have eaten. Oh and lets eradicace Isreal. That’s all so hip. The Irani burn your hijab movement had no momentum on this blog.

    1. John Monro says:

      Mechell][e Mouse??? Uhhh? A bot? surely not, even a bot would make more sense and have better spelling.

    2. Mechell][e Mouse says:

      I think that the Irani women that went around in public without headscarfs are in prison. I have a feeling that Mike Small doesn’t give a shit. Possibly because they aren’t Jews.

      1. Janet Fenton says:

        Perhaps Mechell][e Mouse contributions would be more carefully considered if s/he checked out her ‘feelings’ about people not giving a shit, then giving a spurious reason for the ‘feeling’. Maybe try some citations or sources for assertations would help. Otherwise this is the kind of thing that is best left.

        1. John says:

          Janet – our rodent trolls comments read as nonsense because they are nonsense.

          1. Graeme Purves says:

            Have you noticed that there is always at least one such troll on ‘Bella’. Their obsessions vary, but there is always at least one.

            I wonder if this is some sort of work experience placement?

      2. Graeme Purves says:

        What exactly is the evidence or basis for your ‘feeling’ about Mike Small’s attitude to Iranian women? Or did it just well up from somewhere deep in the bowel?

        Get some practice in spelling ‘Israel’.

    3. Frank Mahann says:

      I take it that English isn’t your first language?

  6. Daniel Raphael says:

    It was a pleasure to post this wonderful commentary/reportage piece at Bluesky. Peace and grace to all who participated in this demonstration…of humanity.

  7. James Robertson says:

    Uplifting, thoughtful and humane article about an event that – to the best of my knowledge – has been reported nowhere in the mainstream media. This kind of peaceful but principled protest is wonderful to see, and maybe, just maybe, the police present saw it for what it was and declined to join in the circus of multiple arrests that took place in London.

  8. Timmon Wallis says:

    Inspiring to know that people are standing up to this genocide, despite the risks they take. Thank you! It takes courage to step out of line, but we all have that kind of courage within us! May every small act like this encourage more, until there are too many of us to ignore.

  9. Mags Amond says:

    Thank you.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.