In general elections the true colours of the media really come in to focus. Here (right) are the Barclay brothers getting their knighthoods for services to Britain (?).

They used to own the Scotsman and now they own the Telegraph. They’re often described as ‘reclusive’, which sounds endearing.

As The Pileus put it: “They are worth £6.5b so when they say the is dangerous – they mean its dangerous for them.”

If you’ve any doubt about the desperate need to protect and shelter the Prime Minister from journalists – you can listen to the interview by the BBC’s Emma Barnett at Aye Radio here – and read Ashley Douglas’s analysis of the car crash interview here.

Or just watch the moment of fear this week when the Prime Minister thought a ‘journalist’ was in the room.

Is that a pen in your hand or are you just pleased to see me?

At least John Major and even the blessed Jim Murphy had the guts to address people on the street. If you are going to take a penny for ‘representing’ people, should you not at least have to actually meet some of them, however briefly?

Theresa May is deeply unstable, and visibly scared of the most common interactions with ordinary people.

This is desperate stuff. But it’s because there is actual choice at this election, even if that choice is remote and being thrown away by a combination of smear and incompetence.

We’ve seen it before with Kinnock and Foot. Ideas that would be seen as being perfectly reasonable in most of mainland Europe (Labour’s proposed tax increases for corporations and the wealthy would put Britain in line with Germany & California), and have widespread support in the population are cast aside as being the frothing nonsense of some Marxist-throwback.


As Jonathan Cook has written (‘Media can’t hide that they’re in bed with May’):

“May, it is clear, is a weak public performer. That is why she has refused to debate Corbyn, and why BBC interviewers are giving her softball questions. She is even pampered with an interview on the BBC with her banker husband, Philip, posing as though they are royalty. In contrast to May, the Labour leader makes a good impression when he is able to speak about policies rather than being battered by not just hostile, but openly disparaging, questions from BBC interviewers like Laura Kuenssberg. During the independence referendum campaign in 2014, many Scots started to understand that they lived in an ostensible democracy only. The media, and most notably the BBC, worked so strenuously to deny them any information that might encourage them to make the “wrong” choice that the mask of neutrality slipped off. In a sign of the desperation, as the vote looked to be nail-bitingly close, even the Queen was roped in to bolster the case for staying in the union. As the UK media all but declare fealty to May, this may prove to be an Indyref moment for the rest of Britain.”

If there’s one thing that comes out of this it may be a deeper media literacy in the general populace and a wider understanding of the corporate interests at play.

In a week where the PM was caught clearly trying to smear the SNP by suggesting that ‘all parties’ have been reported to the Electoral Commission, a statement completely refuted by the Full fact website – it’s important not to assume that this is a bias that is aimed exclusively at the SNP. It is aimed at anyone who might affect change in Britain.

The Greens, the Labour left, in fact anyone who has an articulate idea to rub together will be smeared and attacked.

Watching the corporate media line-up with their political colleagues is revealing. Despite the claim that Corbn’s plans would put us ‘back to the 70s’, there is nothing particularly challenging bout anything in the Labour Manifesto. They have of course been pushed into line over Trident, with an unquestioning media failing to address some if the key logistical, moral and legal questions about our own WMD.

It’s important to find the chinks of light rather than castigate the entire media.

The Edinburgh audience at #BBCQT last night – which saw loud laughter at the idea that the Conservatives were ‘strong on the economy’ is the media equivalent of the boos at the back of the staged-audiences in front of Nicolae Ceaușescu.

Michael Crick of Channel 4 News has been the fore-front of critiquing the medias own complicity in this election:

“What shocks me is reporters collaborate with May press team by agreeing to reveal their questions to them in advance”.

But the press-pack are unlikely to give up access and the need to cosy-in and kow-tow is crystal clear.

The Sun often leads the way reporting on ‘Labour’s Day of Disasters’, and the power an influence of its owner is legion. The toxic tabloid once declared ‘it was the Sun wot won it’ and it may do so again.

But the idea of ‘alternative media’ as a force for change needs challenged too.

The remarkable far-right Guido Fawkes ( used to pose as an edgy anonymous speaker of ‘truth to power’. In one Newsnight edition the blogger Paul Staines challenged the Guardian’s Michael White from a melodramatic darkened room.

You can read the transcript here. 

Now ‘Guido’s’ site is full of links to ConHome, the Telegraph, Douglas Carswell, Iain Dale, Fraser Nelson and the Mail.

That’s pretty Edgy.

As a rule of thumb anyone being smeared or attacked by the media is probably doing something quite useful. But there are great journalists out there, as it turns out, some of them even work for the BBC.