Disabled Scots: Invisible Collateral Damage
My disability is arthrogryposis multiplex congenita – which to you and I means permanent stiffness in the joints. Like every disability, the degree in which it impacts on my life differs from someone who may have the same condition. Spiral staircases, cobbled streets and reaching my own right foot are my everyday nemesis but for other people it may be filling out an application form, preparing their breakfast, going to the bathroom unaided or leaving their own home.
During the referendum campaign, people with disabilities became a homogeneous group often spoken about in the quest for social justice yet themselves received little media exposure; an issue that faced the group “Disabled People 4 Yes” – ironically due to the lack of a No equivalent and the BBC’s apparent need for neutrality. It was for this reason, I felt compelled to climb the stairs in the tenements of Craigmillar and pound the crazy paving that line the lawns of Trinity for a Scotland away from Westminster austerity for those who, like my youngest brother who has Downs Syndrome, could not.
Alas, the majority of voters opted for the Union thus leaving some of the most vulnerable in our society facing a Government which includes a welfare minister who suggests that workers with disabilities are not worth the minimum wage or an Opposition that fails to offer an alternative vision to Austerity Britain.
Over the last few years, people with disabilities have faced the implementation of the Employment Support Allowance (ESA), the replacement of Disability Living Allowance (DLA) by Personal Independence Payment (PIP) as well as housing benefit cuts such as the “bedroom tax.”
The awful impact of the degrading Work Capability Assessments has been well documented but the rumoured replacement of ATOS by American private firm MAXIMUS has heightened concerns even further and led disabled rights activist John McArdle of the Black Triangle Campaign to describe it is “a simple case of out of the frying pan and into the fire.” Whoever the contractor is, you simply cannot get away from the fact that any form of tick-box assessment by non-medical professionals is ludicrous, demeaning and causes more work via numerous appeals that only increases the stress and uncertainty of the person seeking support.
Most people accept that welfare reform is needed but surely this can be achieved in a dignified and uncomplicated manner that creates a benefits system to support those most in need?
On this, Susie Fitton, Senior Policy Adviser for Capability Scotland, says:
“We have grave concerns that the UK Government austerity agenda is the current driver to reforms. This is generating a climate of fear amongst disabled people in Scotland, who are more likely to be living in poverty and in receipt of benefits. We are particularly concerned that the UK Government’s Welfare Reform programme will ultimately reverse the trend of declining poverty amongst households that include a disabled person and create or exacerbate vulnerability, particularly for families that include disabled people with multiple and complex needs.”
We know that the Conservatives have pledged a two year freeze on benefits which in real terms equates to a £3bn a year cut from the welfare budget but this only forms a small part of the expected £12bn to be cut in the two years post 2015 UK General Election. When they can remember the budget, Labour has offered very little hope for the people of Scotland with disabilities as they have already announced plans to stick with the Tory/LibDem austerity agenda. What we don’t know is how detrimental the long lasting consequences of such cuts will be and to what extent they will harm the lives of those already in desperate situations. Westminster’s austerity programme and their ferocious reforms have done nothing but further isolate some of the most vulnerable amongst us and led the UK to become the first country to face a United Nations inquiry into disability rights violations.
There are alternatives to austerity. We could do more to chase big tax-avoiding corporations, we could invest more in green and social infrastructure which will create jobs and therefore taxation, a more progressive tax system would ensure a fairer distribution of wealth and a move to localisation of public services would ensure genuine needs are met in a far more inclusive manner.
It remains, however, that our immediate options are limited and this winter, people with disabilities and parents of children with disabilities will be presented with tough choices when balancing their household budget as they face increased heating bills, additional laundry and clothing costs, taxi fares, care costs and therapy charges. Disability is a fact of life and to deny the fullest possible care and support is cruel.
Disabilities are wide ranging and each one individual with specific needs. Some are from birth, some result from accidents or military action and some come from age. Some people need very little or no assistance and some need full time permanent care. It’s obvious that benefit cuts are being justified by a media discourse that portrays disabled people as scroungers and it is important to remember that the uniqueness of various disabilities make it difficult for such a diverse group of people to mobilise to hold the Government to account. The independence referendum campaign gave so many people a glimpse that another Scotland is possible – we must continue to strive for this and not allow disabled Scots to become invisible collateral damage.