Some Advice for Kezia

Sir_Winston_S_ChurchillBy Peter Arnott

As a once upon a time Labour supporter, I sincerely hope that what I’m writing right now will be fish and chip paper by tonight. But here goes.

I suppose if Jim Murphy can use the referendum campaign as a personal pension plan, then there is no real surprise to see him scurrying round Holyrood trying to shore up his votes for the NEC meeting today. I suppose if you and the lickspittles around you are so deluded as to have thought that the headlines gathered from the Daily Mail et al for your Irn Bru and Egg tour were the same thing as an historical endorsement for your personal charisma as the saviour of “your” party/career, then you might even think that surviving a no confidence vote after you’ve just lost every seat in Scotland including your own is the same thing as a mandate to drag the party of Keir Hardy into the grave after you. That the destruction of all you pretend to hold dear in favour of your ego is a fair enough plan for the next 12 months. I suppose you might not have time to reflect as you begged and lied and threatened every vote you can out of the MSPs and apparatchiks yesterday that even Margaret Thatcher stepped down after narrowly WINNING a leadership vote among Tory MPs. Even when people compare you publicly to Bruce Willis in the 6th Sense (somebody tell him he’s DEAD) then you might, if you were desperate and dysfunctional enough, be sufficiently personally vain or deranged by your personality problems as to cling on.

What is actually surprising me this morning is the possibility that the Scottish Labour Party might LET you. If this was an episode of the Sopranos, it would be time to call in the “unidentified Black males” who get the blame every time Tony needs to take somebody out to the back and cut up the body in Satriale’s Pork Butchers.

Even now, as I write on Saturday morning at 8.20, one word from Kezia Dugdale, even a slight nod…and Jim is in the bag and the bag is in the river.

What did she say to him yesterday? What will she say today as they face each other in the meeting of the NEC? Will she quote Burt Lancaster to Tony Curtis in the Sweet Smell of Success?

“You’re dead, son. Get yourself buried.”

In a development that sends shivers of historic thrill and fear down my Old Labour spine, the STUC have publicly slammed the Labour Party while announcing closer cooperation with the SNP government in resisting the Tories…

That’s the STUC, the founders and pay source of the Labour Party…cutting them loose. Jim may also have been too busy to notice, but the noises coming out of Holyrood this week also signify a circling of wagons in preparation of the defence against Tory Westminster’s Unholy War. On the interpretation of the Smith Commission Proposals and the defense of the European Convention on Human Rights , Tory and Liberal MSPs…and even Labour ones, are forming sotto voce and provisional but quite tangible defensive alliances with the SNP government.

Is this the atmosphere in which the Labour party really want a myopic, egotistical, self serving electoral dead fish hanging round their necks? Is there anyone other than John McTernan and Jim who really think that’s a good idea? That the forward march of history take a step back in favour of the career rescue of one man, no matter whether or not they voted for him for leader only six months ago (in a fit of headline led, news managed bewilderment)?

Surely not?

On a rather bigger stage of history, about this time in May 1940, Neville Chamberlain drew Lord Halifax and Winston Churchill aside and said :”the King has asked me for a name…I thought I might suggest Lord Halifax?”

Churchill was trapped. he couldn’t say “No”…and he couldn’t say “Yes”. So he said nothing. He looked out of the window in silence until Halifax cracked and ruled himself out of the running.

Now…I know it’s only wee Scotland…and the entire future of civilisation is not actually at stake….But Kezia, when Jim says today, “Kez…I know I can count on your support” and he smiles that weird, crooked smile…remember, he knows that at that moment he is entirely in your power…he is entirely dependent on your say so for his political survival…and he hates you for it. He will never forgive you. Powerless in everything else, he will destroy you along with the Party…

Believe me. I’m a dramatist. I know how this scene works.

If I were you, I’d look out of the window.

If you like Bella Caledonia and want us to continue and develop we need you support – please donate to our appeal fund here – and if you can share the link on Facebook. Thank You.

Comments (10)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. A Balharry says:

    Also as a former Labour voter, last time 1997, I can only hope they begin to see the serious errors of their ways in recent years. Will be breathtaking if he somehow manages to cling on.

    Hearing via twitter Jim Murphy has called a press conference for 1pm, so we’ll know soon enough.

    btw typo Hardie not Hardy

    1. Devron says:

      what is your point? You don’t have any time for Jim Murphy and his mob? This is pathos, and egos without the logos. You have the platform and you have a go at this mullet.

  2. George Gunn says:

    I suspect Labour will keep Jim the dead fish until after the wipe-out at the Scottish elections next year. What happens after that – who knows? But they can’t be bothered changing the deck chairs at the moment. If what Yvette Cooper has been saying about the election result in Scotland is anything to go by then none of them (North or South of the border) get it. The arrogance and cultural/political stupidity of the Tories is only matched by the denial/chauvinism of the the Labour Party. Each will rip the Union apart by their actions and non-actions whilst saying they desire to save it. Mediocrity is always a mess.

  3. MBC says:

    I would be surprised if they ditched Jim. He’s sure to get in on the list next year if Labour continue to poll 25% of the vote.

  4. MBC says:

    Beeb reporting that Ian Murray is supporting Jim. The NEC meeting has gone on longer than usual and those just leaving are saying nothing. Sounds like he has got in by a whisker and many are unhappy.

    I just checked the list arrangements. The votes cast in West Scotland in 2011 were 282,000. 13% seems to be the minimum there to get in on the list, but in other places it’s as low as 5.5%. I don’t quite understand the d’Hondt system, but I can figure that the chance of Jim getting in on the list is very real next year. What a toxic force he will be in our fledgling democracy.

  5. MBC says:

    Apparently he has won the vote of no confidence by three votes.

    Looks like Labour has torn itself in two to do so. Bit of a pyrhhic victory then – but then that’s Jim’s style. Like the indyref result.

    Never mind Labour, never mind the country, just as long as Jim’s career continues.

    How does he go about getting onto the Labour list?

  6. George Gunn says:

    One can only hope that next year the Labour vote melts like snow off a dyke and he doesn’t set his weasel paws on the floor of the Scottish Parliament.

    1. MBC says:

      He’s now going to resign (not immediately, but in a month’s time) and has said ‘It’s time for me to do something else’. He survived the vote, but recognises that he has too many enemies to continue. He is putting the boot into the unions. And wants to boost the role of the members.

  7. Bilbo says:

    Rejoice. He is going but not soon enough. Not before he works his notice and delivers a state of the nation/planet sermon to all the people. He is shameless and the Scottish Labour Party are worse than that by allowing him to continue. His sidekick Dugdale is full of bile and contempt for the democratic wishes of the Scottish people both at Holyrood and Westminster which will guarantee their demise at next year’s Holyrood election. We do need a strong opposition but the Labour Party are a total embarrassment and do not have anyone of calibre. I look forward to their terminal decline.

  8. Legerwood says:

    I am not sure that he is going to resign in a month’s time. He has said he will ‘table his resignation’ along with this report he is writing. A slight but telling difference from saying – ‘I have resigned’ or ‘I shall resign in a month’s time’ is he is working his notice.

    Tabling his resignation suggests he hopes it will be discussed and then rejected so that he will be asked to stay on. He seems to be doing a ‘Farage’

    A careful choice of words to give him wriggle room.

Keep our Journalism Independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address to subscribe for free here and receive Bella direct to your inbox.

 
Bella Caledonia