Shining a Spotlight on Power in the Darkness in Scotland

scotlandwall-1A few months ago I watched the award-winning film ‘Spotlight’ – the story of the ‘Boston Globe’s’ investigative unit of the same name that examined allegations of Catholic Church sexual abuse.

Although set in Boston in 2001 the film has a linear story – and old-fashioned feel. This is reinforced by its serious subject matter and straightforward approach that helped it win several Oscars this year, including for best film.

I couldn’t help but be moved by the immediate story the film conveyed, and also to think of its relevance to Scotland. Where have been our ‘Spotlights’ ? Who has systematically shone light on abuses of power, and do most of us even care that most power is exercising in the dark – far from scrutiny?

These thoughts returned when I attended The Ferret’s first ever conference in Glasgow last weekend. Set up by Peter Geoghegan, Rob Edwards, Rachel Hamada and Billy Briggs this is Scotland’s first on-line investigative journalist resource. It has already in a few months broken several stories – including Police in Scotland violating secrecy laws with CCTV, and SNP links to a fracking company – and been nominated for UK media awards.

At a sold out conference, mostly populated by twentysomethings and thirtysomethings, there was interest and eagerness to share examples of breaking stories and develop the skills of investigative reporting. Nicole Kleeman, of Glasgow-based Firecrest Films, described the minutiae, detail and legal constraints of much of their work. She gave examples of making Channel Four ‘Dispatches’ programmes on low pay and working conditions and Lib Dem Lord Rennard’s serial sexual misbehaviour.

Rob Edwards went through the opportunities and obstacles in the Freedom of Information Act, and the ways the system has learned to second guess and block enquiries. One of the most moving parts of the day was filmmakers and activists Siana Bangura and Troy James Aidoo taking about being inspired by the US Black Lives Matter. This motivated them to make a film – ‘1500 and Counting’ – about the number of black deaths in police custody in the UK including the shocking death of Sheku Bayoh in Kirkcaldy, Fife in May 2015 in an altercation with police.

All of this was inspiring and uplifting, if also a little challenging. There was also within the mostly youngish audience a minority feeling of generational grumpiness from older, displaced media voices. Dorothy Grace Elder spoke of ‘Scotland on Sunday’ as once being ‘left-wing’, perhaps stretching the English language to breaking point. ‘The Scotsman’s’ brief Investigative Unit head Nic Outterside accurately remembered that the unit was shut down the moment Andrew Neil became Editor-in-Chief of Scotsman publications.

Moreover, both railed against Andrew Neil’s time at ‘The Scotsman’ in ways which must have bemused most of the audience, and would surely have cheered Andrew Neil. Part of Scotland loves its pantomime villains and it must be reassuring for some to blame the downfall of much of the mainstream media on the acts of one individual who left the scene a decade ago.

It wasn’t Andrew Neil who historically stopped the Scottish press and media from systematically investigating power and elites. It was those who ran Scotland’s press and media who saw themselves as part of those power networks and elites, and then told a selective, even on occasions, deceitful story of their role in Scotland. It is true that the experience of TV and radio has been different from the printed press, but while BBC and STV contributed to a more open, less deferential society, rarely did they ever scrutinise the corridors of power.

Magnus Linklater once proclaimed with certainty and even a sense of pride: ‘It would be very hard to talk about a Scottish establishment’ or ‘clubland’, bizarrely doing this in a book called ‘Anatomy of Scotland’. Arnold Kemp, as editor of ‘The Herald’ once said to Linklater, then editor of ‘The Scotsman’ that ‘we’re outwith the Scottish establishment – which is exactly how it should be.’ While Kemp (editor of ‘The Herald’ for thirteen years) continually said the journalist’s role was ‘to reveal to the powerless that which the powerful would rather keep secret’ – seemingly oblivious to the paper’s closeness to city and national elites.

Many big issues in Scotland have gone unexamined and unchallenged. The only way some breakout is when they explode into the public domain. This was the recent experience of Glasgow Rangers FC going into liquidation, or the Catholic Church’s acquiescence in decades of sexual abuse. In both of these exceptional individuals stood against the system and groupthink such as Catherine Deveney on Catholic Church abuses, or the bloggers and campaigners such as RangersTaxCase and Phil Mac Giolla Bhain who dared to put their heads above the parapet.

Such people faced ridicule and scorn from established voices saying they were pursuing a vendetta or were getting things out of proportion. On the Catholic Church, Professor John Haldane of St. Andrew’s University and the official Papal Adviser to the Vatican, publicly repeatedly dismissed any claims of abuse by the church, including belittling Deveney. With Glasgow Rangers, a whole host of senior football journalists and commentators including James Traynor and Archie MacPherson dismissed what was going on at Rangers. In both cases, none of these people have issued one word of recanting or apologised.

These are two exceptions which broke into the public: a mix of the size of the story, the abuse of power, and the bravery of a single or individual conscience. A much more common picture is silence, evasion and lack of enquiry. Scotland is littered with such stories.

There is Labour’s long rule of the West of Scotland and in particular, Glasgow and North Lanarkshire, a tiny amount of which has come out, but which hasn’t touched on the scale of corruption and cronyism. There is the decade of malpractice undertaken by David Murray running Glasgow Rangers FC which, since liquidation, hasn’t been the subject of investigation. There are the wider tales of corporate and financial abuse which the downing of Royal Bank of Scotland under the leadership of Fred Goodwin was only the tip of an iceberg. Finally, after Jimmy Savile where are the probing questions into our child sex abuse scandals in places which were ostensibly meant to care and protect young people – or are we really supposed to belief this just happened in England or under the tutelage of ‘Westmonster’?

These and many more stories remain untold, and it is often outsiders who break the conventions and do the digging and take the principled stand. It wasn’t an accident that the ‘Boston Globe’ ‘Spotlight’ story became possible when the paper appointed a new editor, Marty Baron, who wasn’t part of local networks (and who went on to edit the ‘Washington Post’). Two examples on which Scottish media did nothing and which were broken by UK media were the huge council-property development scandal in Dundee in the 1970s which was investigated by ITV’s ‘World in Action’, and then nearly ten years later, the George Galloway-Dundee Labour clubs financial mismanagement – which Channel Four’s ‘Dispatches’ broke with their first programme. These were, as with many stories, systemic abuses which had become semi-public knowledge, but which the Scottish media wouldn’t touch, aided by the closeness of contacts with local Labour politicians.

There are many other contributory explanations about the absence of stories unveiling power: power of defamation laws, time and resources needed to pursue a story, and financial pressures from outside bodies through threatening to withdraw advertising or access. All of these matter more today, and in a world of a weaker print media, such factors can be decisive in wanting to have a more quiet life. When ‘The Herald’ recently removed Graham Spiers as a columnist, one factor was a local company threatening to withdraw £40,000 in advertising: a not insubstantial amount to cash strapped papers.

Once the mainstream media had the wherewithal resources to scrutinise and examine power, but it did not have the inclination, for it was a part of those elites: corporate, public, legal and administrative. Now that our mainstream media has many less resources and as privileged a place, it does not have the same monies, people or time to undertake such work.

It is important that we understand what has happened and what is still an ongoing process. We have to comprehend what the media did well, what they did selectively, and what they never began to undertake: what in short, they and other guardians of our public life often put so leftfield that they silently silenced and made for years into non-issues.

Every establishment the world over has always told itself and the world it is not an establishment: that they are outsiders, radicals and have never been fully accepted: it is the story Thatcher, Trump, even Nigel Farage and many others have told, and it was one the pillars of the Scottish press used to differentiate themselves from the traditional, conservative establishment, and to believe they were doing something noble and good and making a difference.

In recent years Scotland has undoubtedly lost something distinctive. But it is also true that the change we are witnessing has a positive dimension. That is in the cracks and spaces which are opening up in a more disputatious society, new media voices and players are emerging which offers the possibility of new stories, perspectives and angles on our society.

Scotland’s mainstream media were for decades more than a ‘fourth estate’. They were a pillar of our distinctiveness and autonomy in all its forms: shaped by Scottish culture and characteristics, a mixture of couthy, idiosyncratic, parochial, and at times showcasing our humour and lighter side. But they were also profoundly conservative and unquestioning of many of the aspects of public and private life: nearly always going along with the groupthink of the elites and elders, from Protestant ascendancy, to unionism, labourism and more recently, devolution.

This is the legacy the new media are going to inherit. It is a strange, confused landscape, but one where new initiatives such as ‘The Ferret’ are going to be needed more than ever, and needing our support and encouragement. Scotland needs that ‘anti-authority culture’ of challenge and scrutiny – which Arnold Kemp and others talked about – and it needs to find business models, platforms and cultural attitudes that make us realise that power in the darkness aids systemic abuse on an industrial scale. Scotland needs its ‘Spotlights’ on power as much as Boston or anywhere else in the world.

Comments (11)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published.

  1. Craig Miller says:

    We seem to be powerless , even the biggest lie will be swallowed . Evidence that should mean all bets are off is met by willful blindness , they said the internet would break the spell , the current conflation of anti fascist resistance to racially based landtheft and Jew hatred shows us led by the nose

  2. Gordie says:

    Much needed. Get the impression at the moment that we don’t have enough coin to go beyond tossing a bit of shite around seeing what might stick.

    If only we had a few hundred million in a pot administered by the people elected by the punters independent of parliament, reporting directly to the people.

    How about we keep our license fee and put it into a pot for our new media, film makers, writers etc to draw on?

  3. Graeme Purves says:

    When did the BBC and STV ever contribute to a more open, less deferential society? I must have missed that! STV appears to be some sort of hobby station run by and for the denizens of Bearsden.

  4. DialMforMurdo says:

    Excellent article.

    As Gerry writes, there are many cases of apparent cover up over the years by establishment types. He mentions all the usual suspects, apart from, well in much greater detail, the lynchpin that protects them all. Our legal system and the spread of its representatives.

    Paid from public taxes and lacking from a truly transparent oversight. Take police Scotland, for example, scrutinised, by well, who exactly? A collection of civic Scotland’s good and great, local councillors, accountants, entrepreneurs, an ex copper or two…

    This mostly toothless organisation is but one step en route to the last recourse to those who feel our Police forces have ‘overstepped’ their role in protecting and serving the people.

    Across our communities, there is a definite acknowledgement of the public knowing who their local drug dealers are, yet how often do we read of suspected drug dealers, on those rare occasions when charged and brought to prosecution, of them simply walking away; receiving a slap on the wrist fine or handed the dreaded community sentence, where criminals are often overseen by a ‘wee lassie in a hi viz vest’?

    One case that has always troubled me, is unique in Scottish legal history, where the accused was cleared of attempted murder and arson, by confession of guilt by a prisoner.

    ‘Legal experts said no one could recall a case in which someone named in a defence of incrimination had gone on to admit the crime.’

    One said: “The Crown will have to look at the case and McLaughlin’s evidence to decide if he should be charged.”

    Charges were never brought against a man who openly confessed to having been guilty of an arson attack on a young family.

    This story is mired in corruption, the accused legal team lead by a now deceased QC who, beyond the grave, appears to have taken on the Lady Di persona of being beyond reproach.

    There is a rotten disconnect between some of our establishment figures, that links criminals, police, Procurator fiscals, QCs and our Justiciary in a cosy circle of collusion. It’ll take so much more than a well intentioned, young social media savvy collective to begin peeling back the stench laden layers of the protective establishment…

  5. John says:

    We need an investigative platform of some sort here in Scotland . Where does this come from , and how is it sustained . Well The Ferret could be a good starting point , but where does it get its platform . The MSM in the UK is so monopolised by billionaire owners, with their own political agendas , we have little chance of getting a platform . If any of moguls did decide to give investigations a platform , that would come at an editorial cost . In other words if they didn’t like what was being put out there they would cut the lifeline . I’m afraid good honest investigative journalists have to go it alone a lot of the time .

  6. The Glasgow Clincher says:

    Posted a comment this morning, only to find it has been deleted without explanation?

    1. Hi Clincher – didn’t see it – what was it?

      1. The Glasgow Clincher says:

        Simply chided the author for bringing in ‘Glasgow Rangers’ (sic) gratuitously when the content of much of the article was to do with paedophilia; he could, for balance, have cited the (alleged) cover up of abuse of young players at Celtic fc (which was allegedly was known about by the great Jock Stein)but he appeared to want to take a sideswipe at Rangers. For the record, Murray’s mismanagement was a disgrace. Seems strange in an article which concerned the balance of reporting in the media.

        1. Whether you like it or not Rangers have been subject to much more intrigue, crisis, behind the scenes deals, allegations of corruption and legal issues than any other club in Scotland in recent years. Is that not just objectively true (whatever your take of the details)?

          1. Harry Lime says:

            The Rangers debacle has been played out in the courts for all to see. I thought the main thrust of Spotlight and proper investigative journalism was to flag social injustice and stop the systematic abuse of those without a voice.

            I fail to see how conspiracy theories about the fall and rise of a sporting institution should even be mentioned in the same breath as child abuse. It’s sad to see such a tragic crime being compared to a football club. Shame on you.

  7. Duncan says:

    As regards Rangers, I’m sure matters there have now been gone into very thoroughly. Some of the people who previously ran the football club and various limited companies associated with it now face serious charges. Whatever anyone thinks of Sir David Murray, he is not one of them.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.