Be Scared of Covid-19 – Be Scared of Exxon Mobil in Fife

It’s eerily fascinating to watch our collective reactions to the global pandemic we are faced with and contrast it to our attitudes to climate change. One is personal (there’s nothing like the prospect of imminent death to focus the mind) and immediate, the other is still largely abstract and seems to be on ever-receding horizons as we dumb ourselves with the bromide of endless ‘targets’ and future dates for when we’ll begin to act.

With one (coronavirus) the science is undisputed, with the other (climate catastrophe), we still wearily have to debate the facts with the monotony of false-equivalence, industry shills, disinformation propagandists and media outlets who still think there task is to churn out fossil-fuel industry messaging as if it was just one other industry amongst many.

This week coronavirus came to to Scotland and we saw it reach 100,000 cases worldwide.

In the global world where everyone celebrates the ability to fly anywhere for pennies there is only one way this is going. The virus knows no boundaries, respects no Blue Passports and isn’t interested in your national identity. The virus will sweep everywhere no matter how many renditions of God Save the Queen you are singing whilst washing your paws. People are rightly unsettled by it, and it’s in these times that you look around and see that the people in charge seem to be Boris Johnson, Matt Hancock and Priti Patel. Unless you’d been told not to, you’d be rubbing your eyes in disbelief and wondering: is this all kind of sick nightmare?

Well, yes it is.

But if the media have been softly buttering us up for emergency measures all week, the contrast and connections with the climate breakdown couldn’t be more stark.  While some people seemed to think that the real issue with COVID-19 might be that it would interrupt “business”, a golf tournament or possibly even the SPFL (!) – the general public was awakening to the reality of the threat.

Cutting through the crap as usual, was the tiny figure of Greta Thunberg. As she led a HUGE #ClimateStrike through downtown Brussels, at the head of a massive turnout of school strikers from across Belgium & Europe telling the EU to quit fossil fuels now she said:

“We are in the beginning of a mass extinction, and all you can talk about is money, and fairytales of eternal economic growth; how dare you.”

Here in Scotland we’ve been in such a state of denial for far too long, mesmerised by constitutional change and transfixed by routine, habit and business as usual we defer to inaction and default to inertia.

One giant beacon that represents this has been the absolute travesty of the Mossmorran ethylene plant, operated by Exxon-Mobil and Shell by Cowdenbeath in Fife.

The plant has been dogged by questions of environmental justice for years as the plant rains fumes, noise and terrifying “flaring” on its helpless surrounding communities.

Last October an investigation was launched into two explosions at the plant, further eroding trust between the operating companies and the local community.

The plant has been “temporarily closed” since 12 August 2019 over safety fears. ExxonMobil extended the closure in September, saying it will remain closed until at least November while it implements £140 million of measures to make it more “reliable”.

At the time of the shutdown, ExxonMobil said that two of the plant’s three boilers had failed. Since then it has been revealed that there were two explosions, which are being investigated by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and were not disclosed by the company at the time.

Linda Holt, a spokesperson for local campaigners the Mossmorran Action Group, told DeSmog she was “shocked” to hear about the explosions. She said:

HSE described the breakdowns as ‘catastrophic’, and they are currently the subject of a live investigation. We were also told that neither HSE nor Exxon have so far identified the cause. Rumours have been circulating locally that the boilers exploded, and HSE’s confirmation makes a mockery of ExxonMobil’s communication strategy.”

For years local communities have lived with the fear of an accident at the plant; trying to hide explosions behind an announcement of a £140 million investment will only exacerbate local mistrust and fear.”

Many local residents have also complained of adverse health effects from the environmental impact of the plant.

An HSE spokesperson confirmed an investigation into two explosions at the plant was ongoing.

The Scottish Government, endlessly tells us that nothing can be done.

The issue is not just one for the long-suffering communities around Mossmorran.

As George Kerevan has written:

“The beginning of February 2020 saw a repeat of intense flaring at the Shell-Exxon petrochemical complex at Mossmorran, near Cowdenbeath in Fife, lighting up the night sky like bright sunshine and pumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere in vast quantities. A damning Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) report in November 2017 listed Mossmorran as the third biggest emitter of carbon dioxide in Scotland (after INEOS at Grangemouth and the now-closed Longannet power station). At that point, the plant hit a 14-year high for carbon dioxide emissions, unnecessarily pumping 885,580 tonnes of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere. Shell’s separate operation at Mossmorran added another 200,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide, taking the total to 1.1 million tonnes. That suggests that, as Scotland missed its 2017 emissions target by 2 million tonnes, half of that failure is down to Shell and Exxon at Mossmorran.”

Nor is this just a Scottish issue.

An investigation from Influence Map this week informed us of: “New evidence has emerged showing that US oil major ExxonMobil met with European Commission officials in an attempt to influence the European Green Deal on climate change, three weeks before the plan’s announcement in December 2019. Notes from the November 21st, 2019 meeting (obtained by InfluenceMap via a Freedom of Information request from the Commission) show ExxonMobil representatives pushed for the EU Commission to change its approach to climate regulation in the transport sector, including removing the EU’s strict CO2 vehicle tailpipe standards, in what appears to have been an effort to stall a push towards electric vehicles. A direct extract from the meeting notes indicate the un-named ExxonMobil officials argued that the EU should:

“Give serious consideration to extending ETS (Emissions Trading Scheme) beyond stationary sources. Tail pipe emission legislation should be substituted with power plant to wheel emission regulation.”

The European Commission’s subsequent Green Deal announcement included increased ambition for the transport sector, including plans for stricter standards for internal combustion engines. However, the Commission did commit to an impact assessment on whether to include road transport into the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS), a policy seemingly pushed by ExxonMobil in the meeting but opposed by climate policy experts such as Transport Environment and Carbon Market Watch.

The new evidence is the latest example of ExxonMobil’s attempts to influence climate legislation globally and comes after the US oil major’s lobbyists avoided a ban from the European Parliament in 2019 after failing to attend a hearing on climate denial.”

Now, finally, somebody seems to be acting.

The Scottish Greens are calling for an urgent independent inquiry into the future of Exxonmobil in Mossmorran, including developing “a plan to close the plant and invest in clean, green industries in the area instead”.

They are also asking that Ministers urgently meet with communities surrounding the plant to hear their concerns and act immediately to prevent any further flaring and limit the disruptive noise and vibrations that are damaging local people’s sleep and health.

Their statement reads:

“Mossmorran has been served countless warnings, final warnings and complaints from local communities but we’re still waiting for decisive action from the Scottish Government. The pollution regulator, SEPA, now appear to be so powerless that when the last ‘unplanned flaring’ took place all they could do was tweet their disappointment from the sidelines.”

This is a Scottish emergency as dire and awful as COVID-19. In the year when Glasgow hosts COP26 the Scottish Government needs to show some real leadership and the focus of our fears and our actions should not just be about preventing a virus but about preventing the spread of our climate disaster.

We must start by washing our hands of Exxon Mobil and moving to Net Zero Scotland. This is inconceivable whilst Mossmorran is still in operation.

Email the Cabinet Secretary now:













Comments (7)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published.

  1. Roger Gough says:

    So the covid virus science is undisputed? 30,000 UK citizens die of influenza every year. Total flu-death numbers this winter have conveniently not been issued it seems.
    At the last count only 2 had died of this strain in the UK and no one knows when the virus came these shores.
    No scientific study, as of last week, had been undertaken to determine the relevance/influence of global warming in respect of the recent Australian bush fires. If you have knowledge of such a report/investigation I’d be pleased to read it.

    1. Hi Roger
      I dont normally indulge denialists on these pages – my experience is that no amount of proof will sway you from what is a deep-seated inability to cope with the reality of what we are facing.

      However I can tell you that analysis carried out by the World Weather Attribution consortium published the first assessment quantifying the role of climate change in the recent Australian bushfires.

      Scientists believe that global warming boosted the risk of the hot, dry weather that’s likely to cause bushfires by at least 30%. But the study suggested the figure is likely to be much greater.

      The analysis has been carried out by the World Weather Attribution consortium.

      Co-author Geert Jan van Oldenborgh of the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute in De Bilt, The Netherlands, said:

      “We show that climate change definitely increases the risk of the extreme weather that makes the catastrophic bush fires (that south-east Australia has experienced) in the past few months more likely by at least 30%. But we think it could be much more. We don’t know how much more. It could be a lot more.”

      This is self-evident.

      1. Roger Gough says:

        Not to the Australian Parliament three days ago. I only raise the point because they could not provide details of any such study.
        Thank you for your indulgence.

  2. Jo says:

    I’d disband SEPA. It’s an absolute disgrace and has repeatedly and steadfastly supported the bad guys going back decades.

    1. Agreed. They need disbanded and re-created with real powers, real resources and without a board packed with former oil people.

    2. Grafter says:

      You can’t disband anything. You are living in a colony. Wee Greta is a distraction as is Coronavirus. Your oil is being extracted and sent south. Your voice counts for zero. The rich via oil companies are making money hand over fist. This is what happens when you don’t have the balls to vote for your independence.

  3. Jo says:

    “Exxon Mobil pulls out of community meeting because of “safety concerns” ”

    Just saw this from Bella earlier, Mike.

    Irony, eh?

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.