Effie Deans on Meritocratic Sunak and Progressive Britain

The proliferation of new independent media is a phenomenon to celebrate. The idea of a media pluralism is actually the DNA of Bella, so too is casting a critical eye over the corporate media. While blogs come and go (lols) – the distinction between old and new media is getting hazier. The previous apparent binary division between ‘independent’ and ‘mainstream’ media is more shades of grey than black and white with Substack and Medium and a hundred others providing a bridge for freelancers and writers.

The new-right has made as much, if not arguably more from this publishing revolution which stems from the late 1990s than the left. But we’re now in a space where the existing traditional right-wing media is drawing on the crazier outlier wing of its own political cadre. Witness Effie Deans ascension to the dizzy heights of the pages of The Spectator this week with a column plucked straight from her own blog – ‘Sunak makes the SNP archaic’ became ‘Rishi Sunak spells trouble for the SNP’ and Effie Deans became Irena Skuba.

Skuba Diving

Irena’s argument, also re-published in Reaction (home to Iain Martin, Gerald Warner, Jenny Hjul and other wonders) was that the appointment of Rishi Sunak would be a blow to the cause for Scottish independence. The logic goes as follow:

“Whether you supported Sunak or whether you didn’t, it is time for all Conservatives and British people in general to wish him well.”

“The appointment of Rishi Sunak has already calmed the markets and we can hope that in a short time we will be back to where we were before Truss.”

“Sunak’s task is to use his extensive knowledge and experience of the markets to gradually improve the UK’s economic conditions. ”

The stability that Rishi and the Tories will bring will undermine the case for independence, so says Effie. But her wider argument is that the life-story of the PM is an emblem of Britain’s unique progressive political culture. Skuba explains: “Sunak’s parents were both born in Africa. One was a GP the other a pharmacist. He wasn’t super rich as a child but studied hard and gained as good an education as anyone in Britain. It says a lot about our country that he can become Prime Minister with hardly anyone caring at all about where his parents were born or what he looks like.”

I mean highlighting Rishi Sunak as an emblem of meritocratic Britain is really a marvel.

Now quite high on this idea Effie proclaims: “It is unimaginable that either China or Russia would choose leaders who were not ethnic Chinese or Russians. It is equally unimaginable in most EU countries or indeed most countries anywhere.”

I’m not sure how much this argument for sustained Union matches up to the scrutiny of the real world, but arguing that we are more progressive than Putin’s Russia, seems, how can I put this, a low bar?

Skuba reinforces her argument with a string of assertions about why Rishi Sunak will undermine the case for independence: “His ancestors did not fight at Bannockburn” she explains, “His ancestors did not demand the droit du seigneur from poor wee innocent Scottish maidens. His ancestors did not massacre wounded clansmen after Culloden.”

Um, okay.

She continues:

“Scottish nationalism depends on people who hate Britain for a variety of historical reasons.”

“Irish and Scottish nationalism are almost exclusively white.”

“Scotland has few ethnic minorities…”

“Rishi Sunak can destroy the Scottish nationalist argument by making it appear irrelevant to our shared future … Sunak makes the SNP archaic.”

Of course, it’s dire embarrassing drivel but it’s interesting that The Spectator has dipped so low as to publish it. It’s further sign of the descent of the right-wing media into clickbait and trash-blogs.

Likened by some to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Irena is nothing if not prolific, managing a regular column in Country Squire magazine along with her many other outlets.

But if Effie’s writing has a plaintive comic element (‘In previous generations people like me wrote in obscurity’) – her core argument is mirrored by Kenny Farquharson in The Times here (‘A British Asian PM is a boost for the Union‘). The premise for both is essentially that Scotland and Scottish nationalism is regressive and reactionary and (somehow) a government boasting Kemi Badenoch as ‘equalities minister’, Suella Braverman as Home Secretary and Jeremy Hunt as Chancellor and Sunak as PM marks Britain out as a progressive force.

Farquharson explains:

“I am no Tory, nor am I particularly a Unionist. And yet seeing Sunak stand on the steps of Downing Street and wave to the crowd before walking through that famous black door as prime minister made me proud to be British.”

The trouble with all this is of course the limitations of diversity rhetoric versus the very real institutional racism perpetuated by the Tories in government and with which post-Brexit Anglo-Britain is saturated.

The gap between Britain’s unhinged blogger sphere and its mainstream media is closing.

Lost in An Gearasdan

One of many trigger points for Deans/Skuba is gaelic language.

Here she explains its demise: “I imagine my small West Highland village had been fully Gaelic speaking one or perhaps two generations earlier, but the language was lost, not because anyone forced the people to stop speaking it, but because for various reasons they chose not to.”

If Deans outpourings are mostly hilarious – her getting lost in Fort William because of the gaelic road signage is an internet sensation in itself – and her regular tirades against Gaelic are more comic than damaging – but there is also an edge to her writing, which is presumably why she is being promoted by more mainstream right-wing outlets.

 

Her core sentiment is harsh and unrelenting: “In order to defeat the SNP we must defeat their assumptions. The initial assumption “Scotland is a country” must not be allowed, for if we do allow it, the rest of the argument follows as a matter of course.”

But if she is considered a daftie – she is fast becoming someone’s useful idiot.

Here she is on snowmen:

 

 

Here she is on Liz Truss:

 

Her hot takes on social issues are as reactionary as her takes on cultural issues are hilarious.

It could be argued that Skuba’s elevation into the daylight of the mainstream is no surprise in a magazine like The Spectator which already hosts the likes of Stephen Daisley, Charles Moore, and James Delingpole, but the call represents a weakness in Unionist thinking and a desperation in their media. If such publications of the right want to be taken seriously, they need to employ credible people to advance credible arguments.

 

Thanks to everyone who suggested some of Effie’s finest moments. More welcome.

Comments (16)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published.

  1. SleepingDog says:

    I have never heard of Deans/Skuba, nor read the Spectator. China has many official ethnicities and (if you include the Soviet Union in Russian history) Stalin was a Georgian. Mary Beard made an interesting point about how, later in the Roman Empire, many emperors were born far from Rome (but that didn’t make the Empire progressive). Rather critically/embarrassingly/deplorably, selection criteria the for top job in the British Empire is as limiting, anti-diversity and regressive as it gets, eldest child of previous monarch.

    Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was (for some) a reactionary Tsarist extremist (probably also a Red Army rapist) whose Wikipedia-described position on Ukrainian independence might give pause for thought:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Solzhenitsyn#On_Christianity,_Tsarism,_and_Russian_nationalism

    There seems to be an insuperable problem for those rightwingers who still want to pay lip service to democracy but whose hankerings after meritless hierarchy keep frothing their lips when their chains are loosened. After all, democracy (traditionally a Conservative Party swear-word) is something the British Empire sought to deny to as much of the world as it could for as long as it could, and still denies its non-self-governing territories today.

  2. Alasdair Macdonald says:

    The right wing media is behaving as Orwell predicted in ‘1984’ by writing the past out of history and presenting its latest idea as having either a long history or is a radical break with tradition or both of these simultaneously.

    PS Anent leadership in the Soviet Union, Nikita Khruschev, Leonid Brezhnev and Konstantin Chernenko were Ukrainian.

  3. Alan says:

    It’s Rishi and his pals that got us where we are. Here’s a link to an (American) old media article, that Mark Blyth describes as “30 years of political economy research into the UK distilled into 1000 words of damning indictment”:

    How the U.K. Became One of the Poorest Countries in Western Europe.
    https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/10/uk-economy-disaster-degrowth-brexit/671847/

    This is why the breakup of the UK is important, not just for Scotland, but everyone in UK. The UK is a clown show,  has been for a long time, and there is no indication the system is capable of serious reform.

  4. Alec Lomax says:

    F. A. Deans.

  5. Wul says:

    That’s hilarious stuff. Cheered me up. Makes Wm. McGonagall look like Tolstoy.

    Presumably Effie’s value to Muscular Unionism is that he/she/other is a “Jock” and therefore proves that even Scotchmen/women can’t stand the FM.

  6. Gercon says:

    I’m pleased to say I have never heard of her .
    Thanks Mike for information on her and the depths to which The Spectator has sunk.
    I hope I never to hear of her again.

  7. Mr E says:

    Is there a point to this article? Would Deans, whoever she is, bother to write an article slagging-off Mike Small? This is just schoolyard wank. I mean, did anyone not know that the Spectator is a right-wing magazine? Honestly, I don’t agree with it’s general political stance, but it’s a very good read.

    1. Hi Mr E, sorry you think this is wank, but glad you enjoy reading The Spectator.

      The appointment of Irena Skuba (or whatever her name is) is a small thing its true but a sign of a step down in the standards of the media.

    2. Gordon McAdam says:

      Wow! What school did you attend?

      1. Alec Lomax says:

        Approved school?

  8. James Mills says:

    Effie Deans is not ”genetically programmed ” to make political commentary !

  9. MBC says:

    What’s her real name?

    1. We don’t know. It could be another pseudonym, or it would be they mistakenly published her real name, which would be funny. It would be strange to go to such lengths to protect your anonymity and then just reveal your real name. Who knows?

    2. Me Bungo Pony says:

      At one time, several years ago, I briefly frequented her “Lily of St Leonard’s” site. I visited because she appeared to be one of only a few unionist bloggers who allowed comments under her blogs. That did not last as all who commented were Indies who were only too keen to point out the many, many, many “innaccuracies” in them. She claimed the comments were “hurtful”, but a quick perusal showed them to be nothing of the kind, unless it is counted “hurtful” to merely point out how wrong she was …. with the evidence proving it. The comments were therefore removed so she could continue to bleat about the “hurtfulness” of them without the awkward evidence of their existence getting in the way.

      Her writings were very definitely on the extreme end of unionist “thinking” (to be kind). Her opinions included the use of military force, if necessary, to ensure the territorial integrity of the UK should any part of it wish to secede. To give weight to her opinion on this subject, she decried the failure of the then British govt to deploy sufficient troops in Ireland to prevent its independence, as Ireland was “British” territory and, by rights, should have remained so.

      She attacked the idea of Scottish independence by citing the German speaking South Tyrol region of Italy, which was annexed from Austria after WW1, as an example of a region with similar issues to Scotland but that was not a constitutional problem. A brief glance at any source on this issue shows it to be an extremely contentious issue with half the population wanting re-unification with Austria and politics in the region dominated by it.

      She bemoaned the “Scottification of Scotland” after one or two Scottish institutions appointed Scots as their heads. In her mind, it seems, the mere fact they were Scottish was enough to prove their unsuitability for the job with only rampant, out of control nationalism accounting for their appointments.

      She penned a series of fictional blogs in which the author as protagonist comforted her English Rose student after her Scottish boyfriend spurned her for an indie supporting lass of, Irish Catholic extraction, despite the author having “proved” British nationalism did not exist and Scottish nationalism was evil. It really was hilarious. All the more so as Effie really appeared to believe it had literary merit.

      Her “Lily of St Leonards” site is …. not worth visiting …. but if you do, you’re in for a treat if laugh out loud, WTF unionist comment floats your boat.

      1. Me Bungo Pony says:

        What happened to my paragraphs? ☹

      2. Jonathan Pickles says:

        Given the rebellious nature of progeny, it’ll be funny when her kids (if any)

        a) Marry a catholic (or any other improper religion) and
        b) lead an indy party in Holyrood, or better yet
        c) She is reduced again to blogging for pennies from across the border as a political refugee awaiting deportation!

        As for her personal qualities, you can prod a good laugh out her if you are really bored.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.