Waiting for a Left Wing Government

In Prospect magazine the author Andrew Adonis writes on Scottish politics (The SNP’s huge electoral test: Humza Yousaf’s party is about to enter an existential battle with Labour). On social media the magazine promoted the article saying “Currently, the SNP’s bid for Scottish independence is inconceivable. Rather, the nationalists should get good at “supporting left-wing governments and negotiating favourable deals on finance,”—making possible the foundations for independence”.

Adonis argument is based on a reading of Spanish politics: “A key strategy for the SNP must be to not overplay its hand in the event of a hung parliament. Spain may offer a foretaste. After last month’s closely fought election the fate of Pedro Sánchez, the left-wing prime minister, hangs on the votes of Catalan secessionists who six years ago tried to declare independence from Madrid. But the newfound strength of the left has come at the expense of nationalists. Sánchez’s socialists are now the largest party in Catalonia. If the nationalists there overdo it, they will probably just end up with another election and further decline.”

This is a familiar trope, that an incoming SNP government has some moral duty to support an incoming Labour one. And it is a misplaced analogy to compare Pedro Sánchez with Sir Keir Starmer. Adonis goes on:

“In this politics—with nationalists in decline and left-wing parties relieved to be ascendant once more in potential breakaway territories—a successful bid for independence is inconceivable. Rather, nationalist skill in Barcelona and Edinburgh will lie in supporting left-wing governments and painstakingly negotiating favourable deals on finance, culture and the locations for new public and private institutions, strengthening the foundations for possible independence hereafter.”

To be fair negotiating with a new Labour government may be necessary, even if small beer could be expected given the mutual animosity between Labour and the SNP, but several things rankle about Adonis’s analysis. First, we are not a ‘breakaway territory’. Second, Labour are not a left-wing party. Third the mechanistic idea that ‘nationalists are in decline and left-wing parties are in the ascendancy’ is a very superficial take.

The daily-reveal of abandoned Labour pledges continued yesterday with a scoop by Lucy Fisher, Michael O’Dwyer and Jim Pickard in the Financial Times:

“Labour has watered down plans to strengthen workers’ rights as Sir Keir Starmer tries to woo corporate leaders and discredit Tory claims that his party is “anti-business” ahead of the next general election. A pledge to boost the protection of gig economy workers was diluted by the party’s leadership at Labour’s national policy forum in Nottingham last month, according to people familiar with the matter and text seen by the Financial Times. The party also clarified its position on probation for new recruits, confirming a future Labour government would continue to allow companies to dismiss staff during a trial period.”

“The moves come ahead of a battle for the support of business leaders before a general election expected next year. Conservative ministers are looking to highlight what they see as a contradiction between Labour’s policies and Starmer’s efforts to court corporate chiefs in what party insiders have called a “smoked salmon and scrambled egg” offensive.”

The Best Thing to Come out of Scotland

The move comes alongside Labour abandoning their commitment to devolving employment law as previously declared (Labour would not devolve employment law to Scottish Parliament, says Angela Rayner). Paul Hutcheon expressed a touching disappointment writing: “This seems like a big u-turn by the UK party. Anas Sarwar told me earlier this year the devolution of employment law would be “phase 2” of a Labour Government.”

In fact Rayner’s decree should be put alongside the other announcements of Starmer’s Scottish visit. In a week where Keir Starmer declared that Scotland could be the ‘beating heart of a New Britain’ echoing both David Cameron’s ‘lead don’t leave’ and Tony Blair’s notion of ‘a revived young Britain’, it was an exercise in vacuous rhetoric.

In one week, as well as abandoning their commitment to devolving employment law, they also announced that they would abandon their previous commitment to Gender recognition Reform, a policy that Anas Sarwar supported and his party voted for …


They also announced (or rather Starmer did) that Scottish and UK Labour are ‘singing from the same hymn sheet’ when it comes to scrapping the two-child benefit cap …

In this context it looks as if Labour have just abandoned their historic position as a party of social justice, and daily provide reasons to contradict themselves, U-turning on their U-turning until they are spinning round and round in a sort of vortex of uselessness explaining ever-more reasonably why they can never do anything and why their previous positions were terrible and need denounced.

In teeth-grindingly awful bromance video Anas Sarwar and Keir Starmer appeared at Gin outlets and Starmer is offered a Tunnock’s Tea Cake from Anas, the caption runs: “It’s true: @AnasSarwar is one of the best things to come out of Scotland. Another, of course, is the Tunnock’s Teacake.”

 

Starmer and Sarwar are like the Un-Marx Brothers repeating continuously: “These Are My Principles. If You Don’t Like Them I Have Others”.

But beneath the banal is this pervasive sense of abandonment, beyond the chummy Bros narrative and the Death by Pragmatism is a crushing impression that the senior Labour leadership was up north to put Scottish Labour into its place. Not that they needed much convincing, nor that they had really tried very hard to establish a different set of policies, why would they? But they had occasionally, mistakenly tried to distance themselves on the campaign trail from some of the worst UK Labour lines. ‘Singing from the same hymn sheet’ with Starmer’s Labour Party may be a death-knell for Sarwar’s electoral chances, or it may be that no-one cares, that Labour’s positioning is thought of as clever and necessary and we are reduced (again) to the sort of diminished and reductive political project of ‘getting rid of the Tories’.

 

 

Comments (9)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published.

  1. Daniel Raphael says:

    Excellent analysis. Thank you.

  2. Thomas Davidson says:

    So: Anas Sarwar is promoting Tunnock’s tea-cakes. Do I not recall that the Tunnock family has donated significant funds to the Tory Party?

    1. Wullie says:

      So clear as mud from the Labour millionaires then.
      Starmers priority is a cecent restaurant in Westminster.

  3. Bill says:

    I agree an excellent analysis. Sadly my view is that Starmer and Labour are the Tories of yesteryear. The tories are now the Mosleyites of the Thirties. Neither party is of any use to Scotland, nor the world in general, at this present time. The lunatic economic fringe that used Chile under Pinochet to experiment with the weird (and failed economic ideas) are now in full flow in Britain as racist fascists.

    Sadly, at my age, all that is left is despair – for my children and grandchildren – as `i feel that I am part of that generation that failed.

    Even the extra 25p per week on the pension gives no consolation.

    Keep up the good fight Mike, we need a beacon of hope somewhere

    Bill

  4. SleepingDog says:

    The Labour Party (in power, at least) has been a party of Empire, not social justice, dissenters and limited populace-driven reforms aside. Anti-imperialists in the labour movement tended to join groups like the Independent Labour Party.

    The idea that our polycrisis of today and tomorrow can be solved by the corrupt and failed politics of yesterday is… implausible.

    Government is likely to have to operate in emergency mode for the foreseeable future, a mode ripe for abuse; unless we can redesign our system of government to lock in the preservation of our living world as its reason for existence. The fabricated left-right continuum in politics is simply there to allow business as usual to proceed when the ship of state gets rocked from side to side, following an averaged course falsely labelled ‘centrism’. We have pantomime party politics when we should be applying systems thinking to government.
    #biocracynow

  5. John Learmonth says:

    The author might like to ask himself why people in the UK and throughout Europe no longer vote for ‘left wing’ parties and why the ‘right’ is on the rise.
    Answers on a postcard .

    1. Wul says:

      The author might like to ask himself why, if people in the UK and throughout Europe are naturally moving to the right, they require multi-billion dollar propaganda and lobbying campaigns, funded by right-wing billionaires, to set the political agenda?

      “Migrant Mothers Cost the NHS £1.3Bn”
      “Illegal Migrants Flooding Into EU”
      “No End to Migrant Crisis”
      “The Invaders”
      “You Pay for Roma Gyspy Palaces”
      “Britains 1.5 Million Hidden Migrants”
      “Migrant Seized Every 6-Minutes”
      “Migrants Pay Just £100 to Invade Britain”
      “Millions Are Eating Halal Food Without Knowing It”
      “Jihadist Killers on Our Streets”
      “1.7 Million New Jobs and 92% go to Migrants”
      “Britain Must Ban Migrants”…………………………………………………………

      Answers on several acres of newsprint, and millions of web-pages every day.

      1. SleepingDog says:

        @Wul, behavioural modification, a primary goal of surveillance capitalism according to Shoshana Zuboff, in other words. Rewriting history to make yourselves out to be the good guys helps too. Getting as many people to buy into social cheating as possible, even if only a few actually prosper from it. Embiggening yourself by creating losers, unnecessary suffering and want. Hierarchies sustained by hypocrisy and cant. Encourage parasocial relationships (with royalty, celebrity, ‘great leaders’). Flags and uniforms. Indoctrination, slogans and anthems. Bullies and beatings. Racism and misogyny. And that’s just from season 3 of The Man in the High Castle (just joking, it’s the British Empire I reference).

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.