An Open Letter to Ian Maxwell from the Scottish Football Supporters Association
The SFSA are disappointed but not surprised by the misinformation that was put in the public domain by the SFA at this recent meeting at Holyrood.
https://www.scottishparliament.tv/meeting/health-social-care-and-sport-committee-december-19-2023 ( scroll to 10.40)
19th January 2024
Dear Ian,
These subjects similarly feature high on our priority list here at the Scottish Football Supporters Association and the Scottish Football Alliance. During the session it was encouraging to hear of the good work being conducted by the SFA, and we welcome all good news stories and positivity linked to our national game.
Firstly, when asked about the relevance and need for an Independent Regulator in Scotland, you used the financial gulf between the Scottish and English football set-ups effectively to dismiss the proposal as unnecessary. The examples you provided included the Super League breakaway saga (which did not apply to Scotland), historic individual clubs’ financial failings in England, Covid19 impacts on the overall health of the game, and the behaviour/actions of club owners who often act without the agreement and consent of their public. You suggested that these issues were not relevant to Scotland, eliminating the requirement for an Independent Regulator. You also cited current governance arrangements at Hampden as “robust”.
However, I would challenge all these points. We should consider, for example, the Covid19 impacts and resulting decision-making that led to the detriment of Hearts and Partick Thistle, amongst others, the notorious “missing” Dundee vote episode, and the considerable financial strains across all tiers of the game.
Also, the fact that the financial entailments of Scottish football are much smaller than those of our larger neighbours down south in no way means that proper transparency, accountability and appropriate scrutiny and regulation should not apply here. I am frankly rather surprised to hear you suggest otherwise.
It is important to stress that both the SFA and the SPFL were invited to participate in this process, but elected not to do so. You will recall I had previous conversations with you and Neil Doncaster on this very issue.
A number of online evidence sessions were also held with experts in finance and other relevant areas, as well as former CEOs, international players, coaches, managers, and football administrators. To casually dismiss expert contributions from eminent individuals (such as the late Craig Brown and Walter Smith) cannot pass without comment. Members of parliament, senior figures in Scottish public life and individuals and organisations across the game at all levels were engaged with our review and report.
The review also conducted an online survey, seeking views on the key issues being considered. Over 2,500 responses (summarised in the appendix below) were received, and this followed earlier research conducted by independent, expert German sports academics with over 16,500 responses.
The detailed case for an Independent Regulator is set out in our report, Rebuilding Scottish Football, which was profiled in a constructive and thoughtful meeting at Holyrood when it was published last year, and which will form part of a members’ motion at the Scottish Parliament shortly. We would urge both the SFA and the SPFL to engage positively with its arguments and proposals. This is in your interest, our interest, and that of the game at all levels and wider society across Scotland.
Independent scrutiny, measures to ensure transparency and accessibility, and appropriate forms of regulation are being developed and extended in many areas of society at present, including sport. There is an opportunity here to move forward together for the sake of the game. In that light we hope you will reconsider your dismissal – which does little to build the kind of confidence our football authorities need to flourish – and work with us and others to look at how the game we all love can be reformed and reenergised.Yours Sincerely
Stuart Murphy
Chief Executive Officer
Scottish Football Supporters’ Association
Appendix: What fans have asked for (from our survey)
• Anger
• Poor leadership
• Distrust
• Self-interest and conflict of interest
• Not accountable
• Disregard for supporters
• Self-serving / contempt
• Lack of empathy for the customer
• Secrecy
• No vision
• Consultative / Customer-focused
• Inclusive
• Open / transparent
• Accountable / independent
• Working for the common good
• Strategic
• Innovative
• Democratic
• Commercially astuteWHAT DO FANS WANT TO SEE?
(Based on six years of research data)
• Fan representation at the highest level
• Larger leagues
• More competition in the top league
• Stop playing the same teams four times a season
• Summer football
• Alcohol allowed at games
• An independent board to combat self-interest
• End of excessive CEO salaries
• A coherent SFA talent strategy for national teams
• Better sponsors – over-reliance on betting and alcohol
• Influence on TV scheduling
The SFA should adopt , as its logo , an Ostrich with its head in the sand as this , to ordinary supporters , appears to be the dominant position it has maintained as far back as I can recall ( over 6 decades ) .
One has only to peruse ”The National Stadium ” which we have been saddled with since its ”reconstruction ” in the 1990’s to judge the ambition , if not the incompetence , of those in charge .
I defy any football supporter who has viewed a match from the East or West terracing to enthuse about the experience and congratulate the authority who landed us with such an arena in the late 20thC . Only those with the foresight to bring along their high definition binoculars with super-zoom lenses will have been able to confirm that the two teams on the pitch were those as advertised in the programme .
Many clubs’ supporters will have have their own criticisms of the failings of the SFA over many decades but there does not appear to exist a mechanism which can be utilised to effect change . This is almost entirely due to the clubs and those who control them being satisfied with the status quo – for whatever reasons ! Looking at the movers and shakers ( ha ! ha ! ) in the hierarchy of the SFA over the years it is not a role call of those with a penchant for innovation or success in developing businesses . Too often it has been those with ”connections” to those in power who have been foisted on the Scottish public . The position of CEO/Secretary of the SFA in the past has too often been occupied by dictatorial figures whose prime concern was to maintain their fiefdom regardless of the impact on the Game , clubs and supporters .
From Ian Maxwell’s comments at the Scottish parliament it would appear that that little has changed .
I can’t argue with the content of this post, apart from one crucial detail.
Football is not Scotland’s “national sport”. That title applies only to the sport of Camanachd or Shinty.
“Alcohol allowed at games”.
All clubs were punished after the riots at the 1980 Scottish cup final. Why? They should’ve banned its sale at any game involving the clubs involved (or at least at the section of the ground their supporters occupy) and allowed the other fans to indulge. Reintroducing it would give the football authorities a means of punishing fans for anti-social behaviour.
Two questions always jump out at me when an organisation states it doesn’t want or need an independent regulator:-
1.Why
2.What are you afraid of?