Beyond Over Tourism
Scotland’s disastrous over tourism strategy is a sign of our political immaturity, our lack of insight and aspiration and our failure of imagination to diversify our economy. Elsewhere other countries are changing direction. We should take note.
In June this year Jaume Collboni, Barcelona’s left-wing mayor, announced they would bar apartment rentals to tourists by 2028, as he seeks to rein in soaring housing costs and make the city livable for residents. The aim is that by November 2028, Barcelona would scrap the licences of the 10,101 apartments currently approved as short-term rentals.
“We are confronting what we believe is Barcelona’s largest problem,” Collboni told a city government event. This meant that “from 2029”, if there were no setbacks, “tourist flats as we conceive of them today will disappear from the city of Barcelona”. Spain’s Socialist housing minister, Isabel Rodriguez, said she supported Barcelona’s decision.
After plummeting during Covid, tourism numbers are soaring again and set to exceed pre-pandemic levels this summer. The number of low-cost airline seats in Europe, which rose 10% annually from 2010 and hit 500m in 2019, could pass 800m in 2024.
This is a climate catastrophe.
Across Europe cities affected by massive over tourism are doing something about it.
In Norway they are taking action (‘Norway is shying away from tourism – and other countries could learn from it‘): “While other destinations have imposed measures on tourists once they arrive – such as Venice’s €5 “tourist tax” – Norway is highly unlikely to do any such thing. The Norwegian approach is to deter them from coming by slashing funding for tourism adverts, as the Western Norway tourist board has done, and quietly shelving campaigns.”
It’s instructive to think, as the author Shazia Majid does, that the driver for these changes are Norway’s love of the environment. She does not shy away from the irony of this environmental-loving nation being subsidised by its oil-wealth-fund. But what does it tell you about Scotland’s own relationship to nature?
The standard line – from such as Lesley Riddoch in books such as ‘Blossom’ and ‘Huts – a place beyond’ – is that we don’t care about our environment because we don’t own the land and we don’t have access to it. She asks: ‘Why have the inhabitants of one of Europes prime tourist destinations been elbowed off the land and exiled from nature for so long?’
It’s a good question. A recent example of the entirely extractive nature of the tourist sector is the closure of Achnasheen Village Hall, located just off the A832. Highland Council says the upkeep is “unfeasible” – and that the “difficult decision” has been taken to end the lease. Hilariously the Press and Journal reported the situation as follows: “The news will come as a blow for NC500 tourists, for whom the toilets provided a convenient rest stop.” Residents frequently report the behaviour of users of the NC500 as ‘utterly disgusting’.
The same problem afflicts the residents of Skye, overrun with tourists to the point where the housing crisis is so acute people can’t get basic trades, or people to staff their hotels or businesses because there’s nowhere for anyone to live. They are going to have to close the C1237 road between Merkadale and Glenbrittle on Skye because the single-track roads are crumbling under the strain of the 200,000 visitors. RET, which should have been applied to residents only has made the same crisis visit much of our islands.
All across Europe (‘Entrance fees, visitor zones and taxes: how Europe’s biggest cities are tackling overtourism‘) countries are facing the same problems. Ironically, Scotland, like Norway will see increasing tourism as southern Europe is either on fire – or uncomfortably hot.
While the visitors levy – or tourism tax – will bring at least some income to theme-parks like Edinburgh – it is a case of too little too late. An alternative approach would be not just to tax tourists or cruise visitors or camper vans but to actually change the plan to just use them as a cash cow to the detriment of everything and anyone else. Change the metric from quantity to quality, design cities for people who live in them not just people who visit them, diversify the rural economy beyond the single business of tourism and have a real strategy for climate-friendly tourism. Where is the plan to reduce flights into (and out of) Scotland? Where is the plan to reduce traffic on the roads and discourage tourists from driving? There is none, instead we set up the NC500 as a race-course,
Just got back from a long weekend in Blackpool with the grandkids. Had a brilliant time. When I was a wee lad holidays were either Blackpool, Scarborough, Morecombe. SIlloth or Whitley Bay.
All these towns are now some of the poorest areas of the UK.
The problem is (despite ‘climate change’) the weather in Scotland/Northern England is crap and so people choose to go to warmer climes.
Back when I was a lad you had no choice.
It was Blackpool (Glasgow on sea) or if you were a bit better off Morecombe.
There were no budget airlines, AirBNB etc etc.
Is all progress bad?
@John Learmonth, you are truly the Joe and Petunia of these comments.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_and_Petunia
SD
I see your still living in your imperialist/colonialist/capitalist/rascist/NATO defended country.
I presume you had a few problems with your visa application for Cuba or could it be that video games and Dr Who aren’t available in Havana?
@John Learmonth, presumably the USA’s illegal blockade of Cuba would have something to do with that? Fleeing (from reality) seems more your kind of thing. I’m more of a Doctor Who critic these days, but I notice that Cuba has the makings of a video game industry:
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20240405-mission-complete-cubans-defy-odds-to-release-first-video-game-abroad
yes
Yes, “slashing funding for tourism adverts”: now go after these artists who are promoting these despoilative behaviours via their work for the advertising industry. Give any apologist some spade (I mean space) to defend themselves.
So… who are these creative workers represented by, what trade unions, and which is the ‘non-political’ one set up by the secret state security services, which is a corporate front? What about Bectu? What about these guys? Do they have anything to say about making overtourism promotions? https://www.creativecommsunion.uk/
are there any public services worthy of the name in scotland right now, I would argue that the authorities have turned their backs on those they consider plebs & its simply a free for all where a lucky few manage to wangle their ain wee corner oot the road while the rest are pretty much left tae fend for themselves in the wilderness, there are no public services wurthy of the name where I live at the moment, &, suffice to say my case when I finally finish typing it all up should be tight as the proverbial duck, let us face it, with so many litigious mak it uppers on the go, watertight shall be the gold standard
Better infrastructure and investment is long overdue, let’s make places fit for both residents and tourism. Places mentioned such as Skye rely on tourism and would be worse effected without them.
Having had some experience of economic development/local economic development, it’s apparent to me that in this low bar part of the world, tourism as an industry is an easy option to apply as part of an economic development plan, but is certainly not viable as a key plank of any economy in the longer term. For so many reasons, it’s not sustainable.
Tourism has been a popular way to shore-up national and local economic development plans for far too long. It just doesn’t work,
What exactly is driving over-tourism?
Is it just cheap air travel? Are there more people with more disposable income than there were 30 years ago? I find it hard to understand because my holiday habits haven’t changed over 40 years.
You wouldn’t get me in one of those huge cruise ships. They look very unseaworthy. Plus, where does all the shit go?
Could more of us be persuaded to have holidays in our own country? Maybe if we all had a wee sheiling to visit, we would travel less?
Even The Broons had a But n’ Ben and they weren’t rich.
” Maybe if we all had a wee sheiling to visit, we would travel less?” See Lesley Riddoch’s take on Hutting Wul, its her Phd thesis.
What’s driving it? Two things, criminally cheap and hugely polluting air travel and the fact people have terrible jobs/lives and the getaway is the reward. The cruise industry is completely unregulated and the world carries on as if we are not in the late stages of climate breakdown.
So this was what happened on a 3000 person cruise ship a colleague was on recently. They pitch up somewhere in the aftermath of serious flooding. A local entrepreneur is ready with 3000 pairs of ‘disposable wellies’ on sale for 6 euros a pair as they disembark. Every pair is sold, and on return to the ship all are dumped into a huge waste container. The planet doesnt deserve us.
It’s never healthy to be over-reliant on one industry but don’t underestimate the scale of the task if you wish to replace tourism.
The number of jobs directly connected to tourism in Scotland is way more than the current size of the oil and gas employment sector, for example (roughly 200,000 compared to about 75,000 according to the online sources I found).
And hotels and museums and the like also indirectly support many more jobs in construction, domestic services, trades like electrical engineers and plumbers, food and drink producers and suppliers, independent retailers, taxi drivers, gardening and landscape services, delivery companies, digital design agencies, the performing arts industries, the list goes on.
Like it or not you’re unlikely to stop huge numbers of people in Scotland travelling abroad for their holidays for the sunshine, unless the price of a trip to Europe etc becomes massively unaffordable for the average person, or as you say too hot to handle.
So attracting equivalent numbers of people from the rest of the world to Scotland is important, if you don’t want the economy to go tits up.
I mean the economy has already gone ‘tits up’ in terms of its affect on the climate Don.
True enough but the desire for people to travel and for businesses to make a living from it are pretty hardwired.
Like everything it’s basically supply and demand which is very hard to mitigate, especially when the tourism market is global.
You mention tourism taxes in other countries as a solution but the impact on price for the individual is so small that it won’t deter people travelling, they are only meant to bring in public revenue that could be used to fund infrastructure improvements. Which in itself is a good idea but it’s not about influencing demand.
If anything they could have the opposite effect because it could drive people to make savings elsewhere, like choosing cheaper but less environmentally friendly forms of transport to get to the accommodation with the tax.
Well intentioned policies often have unintended consequences. Without straying too far off topic, minimum unit pricing on the face of it is a logical idea to reduce problem drinking but problem drinkers could switch to cheaper forms of drugs as a result, like street Valium, which often leads to a risk of overdose.
In terms of the climate catastrophe and the idea that “the desire for people to travel and for businesses to make a living from it are pretty hardwired” – does that make you think anything?
Yeah, it’s human nature and has been hardwired in our DNA for centuries to want to migrate and move around, initially because of survival instincts but now many in Scotland are lucky enough to get some leisure time, people are open to new experiences and see different cultures.
Don’t you enjoy seeing new places, meeting new people and have a bit of adventure, experience nature and break out of normal habits and daily routines for a while?
I take your point about the challenge of air travel and the impact on the environment but the reality is the vast majority of businesses in Scotland are SMEs and have a reality small impact on their surroundings, especially the large numbers of businesses that rely on local suppliers and natural produce.
This is about an extractive growth-based economy not ‘our DNA to migrate’. A great number of cultures have no such ‘DNA’.
The fact that many businesses are SMEs does not change the fact that the model is to grow exponentially the numbers of people flying in to Scotland – or arriving by cruise (see photo from St Kilda). This is completely unsustainable.
@Don Briggs, I’m sorry, but this is one of the stupidest, most ignorant and scientifically illiterate comments I’ve read here in a long time. According to DNA analysis (as well as other scientific methods), for example in this Smithsonian Institution primer, modern humans took nearly 200,000 years to spread from Africa around the globe.
https://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/genetics/one-species-living-worldwide
The striking thing is how settled and adapted humans were (although we obviously had to move with the ice ages etc). We are not genetically programmed to be world travellers. The idea is ridiculous and an affront to human intelligence. And no, I’ve never flown, on environmental grounds (I don’t drive either).
Name all the places you have ever visited on holiday and how did you travel there?
If you have only ever cycled to places, and stayed in a tent, I take my hat off to you sir.
No – I have certainly travelled but don;t fly any more. It’s the future we’re talking about. We need to have low or zero carbon ways of people travelling. We need low or zero carbon ways of people doing everything. Just saying “this is what we’ve always done” as the world collapses around us isn’t credible, is it?
I don’t mean to be facetious. I’m as passionate about the environment as I can be and try and do all the right things but I’m still a hypocrite on this because I’ve used airlines and travelled abroad. I’m in no position to lecture anyone.
Governments and businesses can do all the right things but it’s very hard to stop people travelling if that’s what they want to do.
Here’s the thing, if a Government took the radical action needed to reduce carbon emissions and proposed to close all airports and cruise ship terminals and banned the imports of cheap imports from Asia, I’d put my mortgage on them losing the next election.
It’s not the government you need to influence on this one, it’s the majority of the people you need to convince to give up the many conveniences of modern life.
Even if the Greens managed to win an election in Scotland and became a lot more radical in their policies and managed to achieve Scotland’s net zero targets, I suspect Scotland’s carbon footprint is relatively small compared to China and America to name just two examples out of all the other industrial nations combined.
I’m not saying we shouldn’t all try but the task is absolutely gargantuan.
For more localised over tourism problems you could reintroduce road tolls for incoming traffic to the Skye Bridge and Edinburgh but those were massively unpopular, hence why scrapping them proved a vote winner in the first place.
I think residents rejected the congestion charge by a majority in a referendum in Edinburgh.
These are the kind of problems you’ll run into. Everyone wants to help the environment until doing so impacts directly on their way of life.
It’s not really the problems ‘I’ll run into’ though is it?
I mean it’s not as if I’m some pesky radical outsider with all these weird ideas, am I?
Are you confident that things are just fine?
In 200 years, a historian somewhere will read the documented accounts of the last 15 years in Scotland and the UK and come to the incorrect conclusion that the stories contain a grain of truth but have been exaggerated for storytelling purposes, much like biblical tales as there’s no way such a long list of mistakes could happen in a decade an a half. And I wouldn’t blame them, the fall has been dramatic, constant and probably irreversible.
But I don’t think people going on holiday has brought us to this point in time, no.
The world’s population is increasing because we’re living longer, have gotten better at surviving disease and famine, we have no natural predators apart from ourselves but all this means we’re all consuming more, faster and are living with more complicated health issues into old age. Throw in the technological advances of the last 50 years and that’s why the environment is under threat.
“The world’s population is increasing because we’re living longer, have gotten better at surviving disease and famine, we have no natural predators apart from ourselves but all this means we’re all consuming more, faster and are living with more complicated health issues into old age. Throw in the technological advances of the last 50 years and that’s why the environment is under threat.”
It’s not. It’s because of capitalism.
Every mode of transport in the world could be electric but it still comes back to the central problem is where that electricity comes from?
The vast majority of the world’s energy comes from burning coal, oil and gas which is responsible for the vast majority of global carbon emissions. Until that issue is resolved, the rest of the ‘solutions’ are just tinkering around the edges.
It’s not what we do for our two week holiday every year, it’s what we do for the other 50 weeks of the year, burning fuel for our homes or air conditioning, producing the food we eat, making the clothes we wear, and power the appliances we use for work and leisure time.
To give you an example, the parking and driving near my house is pretty bad.
More than that it’s a concern for me when my kids are old enough to want to walk to school by themselves. I don’t know if it’s residents or visitors but frankly their nationality or purpose for being there doesn’t matter, a car accident is a car accident, the risks are just the same.
The pollution caused by the exhaust fumes could also be damaging their health. The littering annoys me too if said drivers drop fast food wrappers out of their window.
Not enough people use the public transport available or walk because driving is more clearly convenient, especially if they are in a hurry.
But it’s a nice place to live so I can understand why it’s popular. It’s also a public highway so I have no real grounds to complain about them being there. I chose to live here and I can choose to leave any time I like even though I’ve lived here for a long time. That’s adulthood, you make your choice and you live with the consequences good and bad.
If I feel so strongly, I and other concerned parents can write to the local council to install parking regulations or speed bumps near the school and add more litter bins.
But I live in a town, so my guess is the local newspapers won’t bemoan the impact of over tourism, there are more exciting stories to write about and no-one will expect the First Minister or Scottish Government to get involved, frankly they have bigger fish to fry.
I’m not saying the presence of crowds or tourists isn’t annoying or at times a threat to people’s livelihood or quality of life, but it’s just a form of NIMBY-ism and not a major cause for concern in the grand scheme of things.
I think we’re talking at such cross purposes as this discussion is worthless. Have a good weekend.
Have a good one chief. Nice chatting to you. Keep up the fine writing