The Polanski Effect
“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum – even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there’s free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.”
―
Much of the British media/political elite is in meltdown over the ascendancy of Zack Polanski, the new Green leader, who has offered some political ideas which, until recently, would have been thought mainstream. Such is the extent to which the Overton Window has hurtled to the right, simple ideas like progressive taxation, calling out genocide, talking about social inequality or caring about the environment are now verboten. Such is the quietening effect of self-censorship by the surround-sound of right-wing politics that people are just shocked to hear someone speak plainly and clearly and appear to have some conviction.
We have seen this movie before, when Michael Foot and later Jeremy Corbyn had the temerity to step outside the proscribed zone of allowable British politics. Remember when Newsnight did this?

They were relentlessly smeared, just as Polanksi is today.
The same is happening to Zohran Mamdani in New York, who is about to be elected as the city’s first Muslim Mayor on a ticket of practical populist progressive politics. The knives are out. Disgraced and exiting former Governor Andrew Cuomo, talking to conservative radio host Sid Rosenberg this morning said: “God forbid, another 9/11—can you imagine Mamdani in the seat?” Cuomo asks. “He’d be cheering,” Rosenberg says. Cuomo paused and chuckled before saying: “That’s another problem.”
Here’s Mamdani’s response:
🚨NEW: @ZohranKMamdani reacts to comments made by @andrewcuomo this morning on @sidrosenberg show:
“This is disgusting,” says Mamdani.
“This is Andrew Cuomo’a final moments in public life and he’s choosing to spend them making racist attacks.” @PIX11News pic.twitter.com/azINKIrqGm
— Dan Mannarino (@DanMannarino) October 23, 2025
The attacks have not been subtle.

The same can be said for Catherine Connolly, the left-wing candidate in the Irish presidential race who has faced attacks, smears and AI videos [‘Disgraceful’ deep-fake AI video condemned by presidential candidate].

But Greens in particular (north or south of the border) hold a special place for the horror of the right-wing commentariat. Here’s Zack Polanski responding to the absurdity of Britain’s anti-democracy at Westminster, which leaves Victoria Derbyshire astonished.
Watch poor Rory Stewart’s body-language:
Amazing bit on Newsnight where Nick Watt explains to an astonished Victoria Derbyshire that MPs can’t even discuss removing Prince Andrew’s title without the permission of his brother. Zack Polanski raises the questions this poses for a democracy…pic.twitter.com/kwLoiWKpuI
— Ansell Eade (@AnsellEade) October 23, 2025
One thing is consistent with responses to the Greens shifting their point of focus to the crisis of social inequality as part of the problem of ecological breakdown. This sort of systemic analysis (what the dum dums call the omnicause) is intolerable.
Here’s the combined genius of @HugoRifkind @Dannythefink & @PollyMackenzie on ‘Times Radio’:
“He is basically turning the Greens into a red party.”
Many people who voted Green in the last election “will absolutely hate” the direction Zack Polanski is now taking the party.
🗳️ How To Win An Election
🎧 https://t.co/rjWS37Y62b@HugoRifkind @Dannythefink @PollyMackenzie pic.twitter.com/whsNs8VHQx— Times Radio (@TimesRadio) October 23, 2025
Greta Thunberg, who gets a mention here, is of course now pilloried because she has broadened her analysis to the crisis of capitalism and spoken out on Palestine. Where once she was a media-darling, she is now a villain. Stick to recycling and acceptable liberal environmentalism and you’re fine. Step outside Chomsky’s spectrum and you’re suddenly a vile extremist.
As Mike Galsworthy has noted: “This diatribe against Zack Polanski is dripping with condescension and hypocrisy. This is why the dinosaur class of journo-politics is on its way out.”

In this meltdown, Luca Watson complains bitterly that Polanksi “wants to break up Britain” [Zack Polanski is peddling empty promises | Luca Watson | The Critic Magazine].
This sort of process, where Green and Left thinkers, activists and leaders speak out has been causing our own (sort of) homegrown commentariat to hyperventilate for years [some examples here].
These sorts of people operate in complete isolation.
Cushioned in the cosy silos of tabloid offices, they operate in the chummy but fetid world where nothing changes. Having created a world in which none of their assumptions are ever challenged, they produce churnalism of their old broken worldview and go into deep shock when presented with something – anything – that exists beyond it. Really simple ideas, like the idea that people are motivated by the climate crisis, or appalled by the genocide in Palestine, or suffering from grotesque social inequality are just beyond the scope of political discourse. I mean, you can mention these things, but if you want to actually propose doing anything about them, these people lose the plot.
Here’s Paul Hutcheon, the Daily Record’s Political Editor, grappling with such issues with his two colleagues Ben Borland and Douglas Dickie from The Scottish Daily Express, on what’s called ‘Planet Holyrood’. Before you watch this, remember these are well-paid tabloid journos. “What’s causing the Green surge across the UK?” they ask each other in complete incomprehension:
📽️ What’s causing the Green surge across the UK? | Planet Holyrood
🎙️ Planet Holyrood Podcast: https://t.co/bxUq84w7IH pic.twitter.com/jUKS8RDjcW
— The Daily Record (@Daily_Record) October 23, 2025
Luckily, they’ve pulled this from their own YouTube channel:

I think this is the beginning of the breakdown, not the end. Because, despite the overwhelming media dominance of the reactionary and the ignorant, the reality is that Green Party membership in England and Wales under Zack Polanski has doubled to 140,000 in two months, and their polling is rising above Labour; Zohran Mamdani will be elected Mayor of New York City; and Catherine Connolly will be elected the President of Ireland. The independence movement watched these smears and distortions for years.
This is a broken media for a broken politics, but despite all its money, it’s failing.

“The Mirror, Daily Star and Daily Record all saw double-digit declines in both weekday and Saturday newspaper circulations in September 2025.
The Daily Express saw the biggest year-on-year decline in weekday circulation (down 19% to 99,861), according to the latest audited ABC figures, while the Daily Mirror saw the biggest fall in Saturday circulation (down 17% to 226,041).” (Press Gazette: future of the Media: 15th October, 2025).
You can see why the circulation is collapsing, provided by the foolish journalists self-revealing, amateurish, inarticulate and toe-curling ‘Planet Holyrood’ video. At this precipitous rate of decline, the newspapers will follow the precedent these so-called journalists wisely set themselves, with ‘”his video has been removed by the uploader'”
The declines in paper sales are more probably associated with the move to digital content. The last of the paper-readers are dying out, sad to say.
Mr Cowley,
You are, of course quite right about the digital network revolution, but that is not the whole story. Print newspapers are kept afloat for ideological and political reasons (news and politics agenda setting), by their well resourced funders; print journalism is a loss-maker, but serves an important political purpose; therefore it is supplied on the cheap, with second-rate journalism that matches the budget supplied to produce it. The political parties have discovered that the electorate are easily, and cheaply mislead, given a simple, dramatic message, relentlessly repeated . This is well illustrated in their own self-revealing podcast.
There is a revolving door in Downing Street, between “Fleet Street”, Whitehall and the major political parties. They serve it other. Government is not principally about executive management (effectively doing things); it is a PR exercise about managing what people understand are the important political issues. It is a circular stage-managed political exercise (the franchised or chartered terrestrial broadcasters follow print journalism, not lead, in setting the political agenda; and that is its purpose).
It is all slowly following apart (see Caerphilly), because the politics of Westminster and the Press has become completely detached from reality. Look at BBC Scotland, Pacific Quay; they no longer have serious journalism, they emply apprentice newsreaders, and peddle a couthy, parochaial vision of Scotland, borrowed from the 1950s Sunday Post; more Broons and Oor Wullie, than Bernstein and Woodward.
When well paid journalists cannot go out and do some basic research…..
I joined the Green Party (England) in the previous surge, and helped get 5 Green councillors elected in this town. I let my membership lapse earlier this year as I couldn’t afford it at the time, but have recently rejoined.
Just scouring some left media channels on YT for a few days could answer those journalists questions. For that they might have to expose themselves to ideas that don’t agree with their sponsor’s narrative, to step outside their comfort zone, heh.
Sod ’em. It’s probably better the establishment media doesn’t know why the Green surge is happening, it furthers their irrelevance.
I did see in some YT comments, about PR, and some wisecracks about the current meaningless 2-party state system of Tories/Ib-Dems and Labour being replaced by a new 2-party state system of Greens & Reform. Which is an intriguing view point.
The author would be more relevant if he cast his opinions on politics reported on TicTok.
To run a likely 2029 GE scenario from waay back here in 2025?
-Assuming he splits labour and some of reform, there’s a 4-horse race.
-To govern, it sits as a GreenLab coalition, the soi-disant Polanski-Starmer dream-team, that reins Starmer back to whatever the new centre is.
-The UK economic trajectory will be unaffected.
-Inequality will be unaffected.
-Brexit will be unaffected.
-Nothing will change.
When the dust settles in 2034, Labour will try to set the clock back to 2024.
The English electorate hates coalitions, so very possibly Labour will win.
And nothing will change before 2039.
The point is – nothing can actually change the UK downward spiral because it is systemic, it’s locked in,
Not wishing to add to the pessimism, quite a few of us will be dead by then anyway.
It’s our destiny to be ruled by our inferiors, as a great writer once said.
I don’t think I was running a 2029 scenario in 2025, I was joining the dots of what is outside the bandwidth of acceptable MSM. These are:
1) Anyone challenging the roots causes of climate crisis
2) Anyone challenging the constitutional makeup of the British State
3) Anyone challenging the disastrous social inequality in Britain
4) Anyone challenging British foreign policy and our shameful role in Palestine.
Secondly I was trying to explore the fact that this is a media response that is failing.
For sure, I did understand that. The hysteria detectable in the Times editorial and the flabbergasting at Polanski’s temerity by the radio panel give plenty indication this could well be a watershed moment. (Chronic UK inertia is a big challenge, all the same).
Optimistically, Polanski is the first UK politician making obvious progress against the economic mystification that has been so effective in shutting politics down. It is going to turn into an enduring torment for the media and the party machines, as the article indicates.
Yes, thank you Mike, and you did that very well. Here in NZ it’s the same, even though the Greens have long had societal and economic justice as equal parts of their foundational philosophies as their environmental ones – including dealing to shameful levels of inequality and child poverty, racial intolerance, a fairer tax system and challenge neoliberal economics etc – it is almost an invariable that those criticising such policies will eventually return to the “The Greens should stick to their knitting and leave the grown-ups to deal to our economy” whilst they and the media gaslight the citizenry to persuade them that any other course is lunacy. Greta Thunberg is indeed a great example of how this works in practice. I think Zack Polanski though needs to just be a bit more measured in his delivery, he’s a quick thinker and from my point of view he says things as they are, but he can be rushed in his delivery, he can to this old man appear at times just a bit pat and glib when he’s trying to persuade those sitting on a fence as to the merits of his arguments. He should learn to slow down just a bit, take his time to reply, display a more sober statesmanlike quality. Just a thought, others may disagree.
“The point is – nothing can actually change the UK downward spiral because it is systemic, it’s locked in,”
Umm, yes, by 2034 we’ll be at 2*C warming, if not 2.5*C. I doubt Starmer will even be in politics in 2029, he’ll be lucky to still be leader of Labour party by the end of this year. Will there even be elections in 2029?
By 2039 who ever is in charge will be more interested in relocating parliament to Birmingham to avoid persistent flooding and malaria outbreaks.
Making it past 2026 without severe economic collapse is going to be a challenge for all nations. The AI investment bubble is estimated to be four times bigger than the 2008 equity market thing that led to the last crash, and most of that seems to be AI investors just buying stock off each other.
Making it to next week without defaulting on some bill payment is the requirement of far too many UK citizens currently.
Collapsing EROEI and ecological overshoot are indeed systemic, locked into us tumbling over the Seneca Cliff. The 1972 Limits to Growth has turned out to be spot on, although it probably underestimated the pollution curve.
Peak oil 2018
peak economic growh 2023
peak copper 2025
Peak unconventional oil 2027
peak food 2030?
peak humans 2035?
wildlife zero 2048
3*C warming 2050
The main reason for having Greens in power at that point is because some of them will actually understand this, and perhaps be in a place to make the decline less unpleasant for a majority.
The vast majority of citizens of disUnited Kingdom are in for a brutal shock, their current loss of privilege is nothing compared to whats in the pipeline. And I suspect a lot of the youth are more aware of this than everyone is willing to acknowledge, hence the rise of Reform and counter-rise of the Greens – Do we really know what our young adult children are seeing on social media?
UK politics might have just become most interesting just at the time when it might become the most irrelevant.
“Labour will try to set the clock back to 2024.”
This is what successive governments and government wannabes have been trying to do, turn the clock back to some mythical age that never actually existed. Any politician promising such things is lying, its thermodynamically impossible. Even a Green PM.
A radical politics would be to guide the population to an era of equitable sharing of declining abundance, an equitable sharing of power, devolving it to lower levels so that communities can respond better to changing environments.
I’ll mention this again. Bella Caledonia is primarily a Scottish independence blog, although I do think of it as another independent social media source of news. It’s part of my information armoury as it were.
Scotland (and Wales) will get independence by default, whether anyone likes it or not. Simply because, all empires fail and collapse, and it is always the edges that go first. The reason I support Scottish independence from here in NW England is because it will be better for Scots if you can manage that separation – that decline in empire – yourselves. The localisation of power gives more effective management. Its better to have a managed decline than one that waits on the random chance of nature, or that waits on the hubris and over-reach of incompetent others. I would welcome independence for NW England too for similar reasons.
100%
@Mark Bevis, well yes, politically it’s about having planetary-realistic ideology as a basis for plans and actions. Philosophically about leaving the Cave of Shadows. It was disappointing but not surprising to read the general poor quality of arguments against George Monbiot’s case for a codified constitution in the Guardian comments the other day. They didn’t typically even consider ‘which American constitution’. We’re a backward culture in the British imperial metropole, and that goes for all humanocentric concerns, whose ruling class have long venerated and longed to emulate past and rival empires and accumulators, instead of seeing sickness and recoiling.
In terms of change, rather than the language of ‘brutal shocks’ perhaps tipping points, phase shifts in complex adaptive systems, signs of flickering before collapses, highly probably to become cascading failures. The fragility of monopolist capitalism is not only evident in the recent cloud outages but in corporate state capture and subsequent political paralysis. Politics should have been accelerating to match the polycrisis but instead it has been stagnating and practising old tried-and-tested evils.
I agree we should be looking towards the edges of Empire for significant symptoms of its collapse. A lot of the republicanism in the British Empire (formal and informal), and more realistic interpretations of imperial history and critiques of delusional-hubristic colonial culture, have flowed from there. Despite what transhumanists hope for, we earthbound humans are biologically bound by our animal (and biotic) nature, and if we want a functional, healthy form of politics, we need to understand ourselves and repair our relationship with the natural world. Or else, consequences.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink
Perhaps the premise of Sky History’s documentary series Life After People should give us humans something to think about.
#biocracynow
Very hard to disagree with any of those points, Mark. UK State can only fail to deal with them. It’s already feeding its own citizens into the private equity wood chipper and will double-down when it all hits.
Rifkin at al were on Times Radio, not Talk Radio.
Oh, yes, thanks John
Unfortunately Polanski thinks that women can have penises.
Jeez! What a trio of ignorance. “I think with Israel, Gaza & whatnot they’ve found a topic that’s resonating with a certain demographic…”
A ‘certain demographic’ being code for ‘people we obviously despise’. However that ‘certain demographic’ is, in reality, around 82% of UK citizens.
Hopelessly out of touch, entitled and with fully enslaved minds.
Wul – the media and many politicians are in a bubble talking to themselves- the very thing they often accuse their opponents of. Nothing exhibited this more than their reporting of Maccabi Tel Aviv and West Midlands Police ban on their supporters. It had shown many of these people up to be utterly ill informed and frankly dishonest.
I would recommend watching Fourcast with Peter Oborne and Edmund Fitton-Brown to understand the sheer immorality and lack of questioning of this UK establishment group think.
Further to the “sheer immorality and lack of questioning of this UK establishment group think.”
The government tried to give DWP fraud investigators the right to use physical force, (no doubt against disabled people) but it was thrown out by the Lords:
https://www.thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2025/10/24/dwp-fraud-officers/
Something I think that should be given more exposure.