Scotland the Brave

Suddenly, Renton’s famous moorland observation doesn’t ring so true.

Last night, the stage was set at Hampden for yet another inglorious failure, but Scotland changed the script and wrote a different ending.

Scotland, managed by the taciturn Steve Clarke, beat Denmark, a side who, it should be remembered, are 18 points above us in world rankings, broke the mould of almost thirty years of failure and won handsomely, spectacularly, beautifully.

This was a fairy tale that Hans Christian Anderson couldn’t have made up. All over the pitch there were heroes. From brave wee Ben Doak who delivered the cross for McTominay’s wonderstrike, to John McGinn, who was on fire, to Craig Gordon defying the onset of time itself. Kieran Tierney, who has had horrendous injuries to overcome, brought us back into the game, and how did Kenny McLean have the audacity to do that at the end? Both Aaron Hickey and Lewis Ferguson have had their careers disrupted by injury, but have fought back. It’s said that the much derided Grant Hanley felt the need to say sorry to Steve Clarke for his display in Greece. “You don’t have to apologise to me, ever, for how you play” Clarke replied.

This was a redemption story.

Emotions, that thing us Scots aren’t always that good at, were everywhere. Andy Robertson admitted in a post-match interview that he couldn’t get his former teammate Diego Jota out of his head for the whole day. “I was in a bit of trouble in my room earlier. I think I hid it well from the boys. I know he’ll be somewhere smiling over me” he said. After rocking Hampden Park after only three minutes, Scott McTominay, who himself had been discarded by Manchester United, went looking for his mum in the stand.

 

Before the game, Steve Clarke was quoted as saying: “Play with an anticipation of success rather than with a fear of failure.” If he might strike you as an unlikely source for unbridled optimism, it seems to have worked. Scotland, so often paralysed by the enormity of the moment, didn’t just raise their game, they changed it.

We’ve learned failure, but last night we unlearnt it.

I’ve been walking about in a sort of stupor all day, stunned. This, I suppose, is what winning feels like. It’s an odd experience. Being a Scotland fan is to be familiar with ritual humiliation. It’s like experiencing low-level trauma. Our ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory has happened so often that it feels like it’s in our DNA. Entire lifetimes are pockmarked by defeat.

How we won was more important than that we won.

Despite the individual goals and glory, we won as a team. We came back from adversity after adversity (losing Souttar, losing Doak and the Danes equalising twice). In the past, we might have buckled, but last night was different. We didn’t just win, we won in style.

In an interview, the captain Andy Robertson said: “I’ve never wanted to be a poster boy, but if I’m going to be a poster boy for anything, it should be this ― if you don’t give up, and if you carry on believing in yourself when others are doubting you, you can make it. You can show that you are good enough.”

Believe in yourselves eh? It might catch on.

Comments (35)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. SleepingDog says:

    Scotland didn’t raise their game, they played poorly, as McGinn noted after the match. Arguably they were the 4th-best side in the group and improbably won it (their best performance was their first game, drawing away in Denmark). Yes, Scotland men’s team were sporadically brilliant on the night, but habitually toothless in attack, clueless in defence, and glueless in midfield. Denmark were better overall against Scotland. Greece were better overall against Scotland. Belarus outplayed Scotland for long periods which frustrated the Hampden crowd. Steve Clarke’s Scotland have had another lucky qualification campaign, although sandwiched between was a creditable and competitive Nations League campaign against stiff opposition where Scotland might have deserved more points.

    1. John says:

      So speaks the football guru – you sound like the Rev I M Jolly.
      Yes we rode our luck and didn’t play as well as we could’ve over last 4 games but (and this a rather big but) the players didn’t give in and stop believing they could qualify and achieved their goal despite being 3rd placed seeds.
      Yesterday evening was a rollercoaster of emotions and ultimately a successful and emotionally memorable evening.
      None of us can imagine the pressure the manager and players (of both sides) were under last night. I would imagine the supporters of Denmark & agree e don’t feel too chuffed about their managers today.
      Sometimes, just sometimes, a bit of credit to team who achieved their goal rather than amateurish self important analysis is the moreappropriate response.

    2. Jesus. What would it take to inspire you?

      1. SleepingDog says:

        @Editor, if you wanted to stick with media punditry, you could ask some piercing questions about why the BBC is fielding a team of football pundits whose numbers front-of-camera increasingly rival that of the international squad, yet whose main tasks appear to be cheerleading and softballing pleasantries to each other. But at least those pundits recognised that Denmark were done an injustice by the second yellow for a defender’s innocuous challenge on the overclaiming McGinn. I think that’s more adversity than the Scots faced.

        Maybe, just a suggestion, give someone else the task of football reporting, and balance the coverage with the SWNT, whose absence is glaring but unexplained.

        1. Douglass says:

          I’m still not sure that was a penalty for Denmark, and if you’re running at speed as McGinn was the slightest nudge will send you to the floor, so I can’t see there has been any injustice last night at all as you seem to be saying… only in dour Calvinist Scotland could someone contrive to put a damper on the night as you have…

          As for who played better, you confuse having the ball with playing well. Denmark had more of the ball, too much of it, but for the most part they lacked any real threat and their marking for the second Scotland goal was atrocious, as was the sclaffed clearance which set up Tierney’s goal… we didn’t any mistakes as bad as those, a so-so penalty and tired legs accounted for the Danes’ goals…

          Those were really bad mistakes, and so they deserved to lose…

          Scotland’s will to win, their hunger, their desire to get to the World Cup made the difference on the night.

          They have a great togetherness which has won us the first world cup qualification group since 1982, and it is thoroughly deserved in the sense that we played two games against the top seed and took 4 points… all the rest is noise…

          Well done, Scotland, a truly fantastic night (the James Joyce pub in Madrid was going ballistic)…

        2. LOLs – your tone is unsufferable on almost every level.

          1. SleepingDog says:

            @Editor, well, the Feelings Police are out in force. Have any of you been watching Pluribus?

          2. John says:

            Sleeping Dog – can you share with us your experience of playing, managing, watching and therefore under football over the years since you appear do so willing to share your self entitled superior knowledge on the subject

  2. James says:

    Gemini, could you please summarise the comments for me;

    Of course, yoU dOn’T DesERve To bE HapPy

  3. Niemand says:

    I agree SD is being too negative – qualifying was a great achievement and the panache of the goals against Denmark was great to behold and shows what is possible, but he makes a decent point about the team’s overall performances and the lack of critical insight from pundits (and indeed much sense of neutrality / objectivity).

    And the point now is, what next? We all know the team’s record in the actual World Cup. Going out with the usual whimper, after some inevitable serious hype, would be almost worse than not qualifying.

    1. Douglass says:

      Seriously, we just got 4 points out of 6 from the top seed of the group to qualify for the WC and you’re for poring over Scotland’s shortcomings?
      As James says above, human being do have the right to be happy now and again, even if they’re Scottish…
      The World Cup is 7 months away, enjoy the moment…

      1. Agreed Douglas, the irony is the article is about finding joy in the moment and the power of positive thinking, redemption and the ability of us to reconceive of ourselves, and the response is … to dwell in the negative … you couldn’t make it up.

    2. John says:

      Niemand – ask the 200,00 fans who attended Euro 2024 whether they would have preferred Scotland had failed to qualify? Ditto the tens of thousands that will go to World Cup this summer.? Ask the vast majority of Scottish supporters who are not travelling? Can we not just enjoy a memorable evening that probably engendered more happiness in Scotland than anything since 2014 Commonwealth Games which we also have to look forward to next year.
      Scotland were unquestionably poor last summer but it is well recognised that not only were McTomminey and McGinn barely fit we also lost Tierney in first match. They were all key players in the side.
      I don’t think Scotland will perform as badly in World Cup finals next year but if we are honest qualifying for knockout out stages with an ageing group of players, aided and abetted by some younger talent, would be a great achievement.
      To qualify for 3 out of 4 tournaments is a significant achievement for Stevie Clarke regardless of how it was achieved. To take Scotland beyond group stages at finals would cement his legacy as possibly Scotland’s most successful manager.

      1. Niemand says:

        The thing the manager and players will be thinking about now is how to progress beyond the group stage and they will be looking at recent performances and working out how best to do that. Getting out of the group stage would be success, not doing so will be failure, this is reality.

        None of that should take anything at all away from the achievement of qualifying and, finally, the way it was done. Celebrating that is natural and lifts the nation. It brings joy, but it is just the start, not the end. And we want the end to be different to what has always happened before, no?

        1. Douglass says:

          It’s about the timing…

          We just qualified and yourself and, much more negative still, SD, seem to be incapable of just enjoying the moment…

          This is partly why we lost in 2014. It’s part of our Calvinist legacy that enjoying oneself is suspicious and positive thinking is seen as a kind of glibness…

          Finally, in my comment above, I used the expression “poring over” and yet it appeared in my comment as “pouring over”.

          Bella, do you have some kind of AI / automatic corrector switched on?

          The correct term is pore over not pour in this particular case, and I’m mystified how, having written poring over it appears as pouring over…

          1. No AI – I mistakenly corrected it! Sack the Ed.

          2. Niemand says:

            I am not incapable of that at all. I am enjoying it. You can look to the future at the same time, see what needs to be overcome next. It is what the team and manager will be doing. It is what football fans do.

            I think it a little rich given your very numerous and profoundly negatively comments about Scottish cultural life to castigate people for ‘Calvinist’ negativity and joy-dampening.

          3. John says:

            Douglas – I am not so sure I think it is more about some individuals opinions being more important than anything else.
            Many people on here, myself included (& editor), have criticised Stevie Clarke in past. We are now happy to give him credit for winning group and enjoy what was a special evening. This doesn’t mean we think performances have been perfect but no. 1 target is to qualify and this has been achieved without even needing a playoff beating higher ranked teams.
            Some critics of Stevie Clarke are so taken with their own opinions that he is hopeless as a manager that I rather suspect they would have been happier if Scotland had failed to qualify so they could tell everyone how right they were!

        2. John says:

          Niemand – not getting out of group stages at WC would be failure? This means that every Scottish team and manager so far has been a failure?
          Bearing in mind we are in pot 3 we are not seeded to get out of group. To get out of group would be a success and not to get out would be a disappointment but not a failure.
          Getting out of group stages is not easy and partly depends on luck of draw. It will also depend on our best players being fit and healthy come next summer. I do hope that the manager will see this as an opportunity to cast off some of his overly cautious approach and go for it as happened when 3/0 down to Greece and at 1/1 with Denmark. It can pay dividends if you carry a bit of luck and makes for great viewing.
          Stevie Clarke’s record in qualifying for finals makes him as successful a Scotland manager as any of his predecessors. If he can manage Scotland to get out of group stage to knockout stage he would become the most successful manager ever.

          1. Niemand says:

            It is debatable John, for sure. Personally, I would call it a failure, yes, though ‘disappointment’ will do just as well as a euphemism 😉

            Either way, that surely must be the main aim, and a realistic one?

  4. WT says:

    Agree with your article. Great night. Give me crap performance, great result any time. As a Hamilton supporter a great performance usually returns a crap result so too does a crap performance. Feeling great today. Brilliant goals, and for those who criticise the performance, Denmark didn’t score from their attacks – that too is football. Denmark might have played with ten men for a good bit of the match, but getting sent off for yellow card offences is also part of football. Two teams played one scored more goals than the other they won, what’s the matter with that?

  5. Alistair Taylor says:

    Well done Scotland!
    50 years from now people will still be talking about the Denmark game at Hampden in 2025.

    I still vividly remember Joe Jordan scoring the winner against Czechoslovakia in 1973, at Hampden, to qualify us for the 1974 World Cup. (Where we were the only undefeated side in the tournament, and played the reigning champions Brazil off the field in a 0-0 draw.)

    Great to feel good about the fitba’ for a change!
    Onwards to better things.

    Who knows, perhaps the Trumpster will have a heart attack and die next summer…

    Hope springs eternal.

    Perhaps we’ll get to the last 32!
    (In 1974 we were already in the last 16, and missed out on the quarter finals on goal difference. We seriously had a shot at winning it. No joking.)

    1. John Learmonth says:

      Billy Bremners miss with the Brazil goal gaping just 3 yards away…..and them him and Dennis Law playing ‘keepy uppy’ against Zaire thinking a draw would get us thru.
      Haunts me till this day…..

      1. Gerry Hassan says:

        Scotland beat Zaire 2-0. This was Scotland’s first game in 1974. Billy Bremner decided to sit on Scotland’s half-time lead not knowing how poor Zaire were. A factor in such behaviour is that Scotland until this point had never won a game in the World Cup finals.

        The Brazil game came next followed by Yugoslavia. Not only have Scotland never got to the second round of the World Cup or Eurps. They have won a mere six games out of 35 in World Cup finals and Euros: four in the World Cu[ and two in Euros.

        Let’s hope we can improve this picture in the 2026 World Cup.

        1. John says:

          Gerry – I remember watching game as a teenager with my dad who had been a professional footballer. It was not only obvious to me at halftime that Zaire were poor the second half was one of the few times I saw my dad get frustrated watching a game due to Scotland’s lackadaisical approach.
          Willie Ormond was an excellent manager for getting a good blend of players but he was too deferential to powerful players in team. I think it’s fair to say Jock Stein would have told Bremner how to play second half. In addition Dennis Law, a great servant to Scotland, should not have been playing as he wasn’t fit due to dodgy knees from years of defenders tackling. He has admitted this himself and retired immediately after World Cup. Again I really doubt Jock Stein would have let sentiment overcome what was best for the team if he had been manager in 1974.

  6. Left Ear says:

    “Then ye returned to your trinkets; then ye contented your souls
    With the flannelled fools at the wicket or the muddied oafs at the goals.”

    1. Alistair Taylor says:

      Left Ear,
      Kipling, nae bad!
      Yes, the sport, the fitba’, it’s a distraction for sure.

      The next few decades are going to be messy.
      And ah don’t mean Messi.

  7. Douglass says:

    Niemand, I’ve been called many things in my time, probably deservedly, but my failings have been always the other way, not Calvinist in any case, more like Irish, when I read things in history books about the Irish I think they could easily be describing me (hotheaded, passionate, impulsive when not reckless, with an acute sense of justice and, of course, crapulous, though there the Scots and Irish must surely tie).

    Probably all these things are not much more than stereotypes, but we’re all a wee bit superstitious, and it was only two generations ago my great uncle, who after receiving a war wound after serving in the infantry of the British Army, before volunteering for the RAF, declared “I’m still not sure if we’re fighting on the right side”, not from any sympathy for Hitler, but because he was Irish-Scots and deeply distrusted the British Empire… In any case, it was my Irish communist granny who awoke my political consciousness without any doubt… that and the miners’ strike…

    As for Scottish culture, yeah, I am deeply worried about it. There is no other country in the world where elite university culture is so well financed and supported and popular culture so badly treated: DJs, music venues like the Arches, film, and anything that isn’t grist for the mill of the universities is neglected..

    There’s a whole breed of people who, highly intelligent, give up trying to be independent to toe the university line… Not that I blame them…

    In Europe, which is much cheaper than Britain, you can still dodge and dive enough to get by and the cultural life of Spain, totally dwarfs that of Britain for example… I’m talking about books published, films released, and exhibitions… it’s not just a bit better, it’s a lot better, and you simply can’t keep up living in Madrid or Barcelona… even the right-wing here believe in culture…

    In Spain, which isn’t France or Germany, the powerhouses of European culture, the universities are rarely mentioned and there are numerous indepedent writers and researchers who do what our uni professors do… but in conditions of greater freedom…

    So, yeah, I would say anybody who casts an eye over the Scottish cultural scene can only conclude there is a problem…

    We, the Scots, were once a powerhouse, now we are a venue… but of course it can be reversed…

    1. Douglass says:

      Not long ago, having a bit of a lull in work, I decided to translate a very famous Spanish book which had just come into the public domain on spec and look for a publisher in Scotland…

      So, eventually, after doing the work, I tried to get someone to read it…. I’ve been in Spain for 35 years by the way and have read by now probably a hundred Spanish books and seen hundreds of Spanish films… I am totally bi-cultural Scottish-Spanish… I work in Spanish every single day…

      So, someone in the Scottish literary scene, who I met by chance and hardly know, recommended I write to some Scottish university professor, a translator, though not of Spanish…

      So I did, and asked him if he could give me the details of the UK publisher in London I wanted to contact so I could pitch it to them…

      He refused to give me the email. It’s not like I was asking him to endorese the translation, I just needed a contact…

      He said to me “I don’t know your credentials”…

      And so, these people, petty and ludicrous, are the people who run Scottish culture… the uni professors and arts administrators..

      The idea you need “credentials” to present a work on spec in translation, well it sums up Scotland I’m afraid…

  8. Sandra Hunter says:

    Ach -and Lawrence Shankland’s wee tap in goal left out of coverage again. His wee tap gave a lift right after the Denmark penalty downer so just as valid as the more showy grand goals.

    1. Douglass says:

      Yeah, but it was McTominey who spooked them, jigging back to edge of the six yard box…

      Three Danish players all rushed to mark him, leaving no one at the front post, a schoolboy error…

      As for what I was saying above, I had read 161 Spanish books up from 2012 up to November 2023 (I started keeping a note of my reading in 2012), so the idea some Scottish university professor can talk down to me is ludicrous…

      But what he meant by credentials is a PhD, of course…

      BORING, STRAIGHT, SQUARE SCOTLAND…

      1. John says:

        Douglas – do you have a chip on one or both shoulders’?
        From your comments on football, art and Scotland you should be awarded a PhD for Arrogance!

        1. Douglass says:

          Arrogance? Arrogance when someone knows what they’re talking about is fine with me…

          Graeme Souness was a very arrogant player, but I liked that about him personally… it was part and parcel of his style of play…

          McDiarmid was also very arrogant, but it never put me off his poetry, on the contray, I think he was absolutely brilliant when he was at his worst..

          You must work or have worked in Scottish academia, right?

          That’s what this all about, you BORES are the unquestionable facet of Scotland, even though, a) the generalist university culture which made Scotland different was abandonded more than a century ago to please the English and qualify Scots for civil service work in the Empire b) Edinburgh was a hotbed of fascist ideas about racial hierarchies for almsot two centuries, without so much as a single university professor seeming to doubt their own untouchable status as a result of that…

          Arrogant? Fine. If you find me arrogant, and I don’t think of myself as such, that’s fine by me…

          The people who have sold out Scotland over 3 centuries are the middle and upper classes, never the Scottish working class…

          Scottish uni professors, by and large, are a bunch of carreerist creeps, who never fail to play the indie card cause they know it makes them look trendy…

          1. John says:

            There is a slight difference Douglas.- Graeme Souness and Christopher Grieve had undoubted talent to go with their arrogance.
            Ps – I do not work in academia before you go off on one.

        2. Douglass says:

          You don’t know anything about me, but thanks for the insult anyway. It’s always a pleasure to be insulted on line by a complete stranger…

          Have you read George Elder Davie’s “The Democratic Intellect” where he explains how the distinctiveness of Scottish higher education was eaten away over the course of the 19th century?

          Or “The Eclipse of Scottish Culture” by Trunbull and Beveridge?

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.