Orbán’s Reign is Over but is Orbánism?

Viktor Orbán’s party has been heavily defeated, in an election with a record turnout of 79%. And, if the victorious candidate, Péter Magyar, is hardly a progressive winner, it is an era-defining election in Hungary and a massive defeat for the far-right. But will his defeat crush the networks of funding to the extreme right which have spiralled out from Hungary for years?

As Laura from Normal Island News put it:

“In a deeply upsetting moment for fascists everywhere, Viktor Orbán’s 16-year reign of terror came to a shuddering halt after his Fidesz party suffered a humiliating landslide defeat in Hungary’s parliamentary elections on Sunday.

The man who turned “illiberal democracy” into a brand was finally shown the door by voters who had grown tired of his strongman act after more than a decade and a half. Trump and Netanyahu are said to be distraught, mourning the loss of the only world leader as open as they are about his contempt for international law.”

The result is also a major blow to the networks of dark-money that has flooded the far-right in Britain, including arch-Unionists such as Nigel Biggar and Douglas Murray.

Much of this brigade of cultural warriors is engaged in a sort of mutilated form of ‘free speech’ advocacy distorted through the lens of patronage and far-right libertarianism, exemplified by Spiked! but seen across the new right.

In 2019 Nigel Biggar organised a conference on the theme of ‘censorship’.with Eric Kaufmann, author of WhiteshiftPopulismImmigration And The Future Of White Majorities, Frank Furedi and Bruce Gilley. For coverage of this event see Gordon Gutheir: These Islands — An Open Letter.

Mathias Corvinus Collegium, NatCon and the Right Wing Media Swamp

Biggar and Murray have been part of the NatCon movement that has been directed out of Hungary for years. What we have seen is the Mathias Corvinus Collegium (MCC), the conservative Hungarian educational institution funded by Viktor Orbán’s right-wing government, expanding across Europe with projects in Brussels, Vienna and London.

As Sam Bright of DeSmog has written (‘‘Hard-Right’ NatCon Event Was Organised by Oil Funded Group‘): “MCC is chaired by Balázs Orbán, who is the Viktor Orbán’s political director. The think tank’s board also includes Hungary’s Minister of Culture and Innovation, János Csák. According to the investigative outlet Follow The Money, MCC is conservative, nationalist and Eurosceptic, and “plays a key role in spreading the ideology of the Hungarian government”. Balázs Orbán has said: “It is our goal for Hungary to become an intellectual powerhouse, in which MCC plays a key role.”

The NatCon Brussels (2024) organising committee also featured sociologist Frank Furedi, the executive director of MCC Brussels. Furedi delivered the 2020 annual lecture at the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), the UK’s leading climate science denial group, on the subject “eco hysteria”. During the lecture, he promoted the fringe claim that politicians and corporations are trying to push civilisation into a “climate lockdown” by reducing individual freedoms.”

In 2022, the writer Ravi Bali noted (‘Ex-Marxist Furedi Joins Racist Authoritarians at CPAC Hungary‘): “Frank Furedi––who was the foremost intellectual of UK radical-left group, the Revolutionary Communist Party, for more than 25 years––has made the transition from revolutionary Marxism into the fold of white-nationalist authoritarianism. Furedi spoke last week at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Budapest, Hungary. CPAC is organised by the American Conservative Union (ACU), the foremost right-wing Republican organisation in the United States.”

These networks have been sustained through intermediaries and find channels and outlets through ‘mainstream’ publishing houses like The Spectator, where Douglas Murray is Associate Editor, and Michael Gove the Editor. In fact, there’s a Scottish contingent to the Spectator’s output with Fraser Nelson pre-dating Gove in the editor’s chair and Alex Massie and Stephen Daisley also gracing its pages. Indeed, the magazine was founded, by the Scot Robert Stephen Rintoul, former editor of the Dundee Advertiser. It’s ironic that there are Scottish journalists at the heart of the publication that is really at the apex of British Nationalism and hard-right influence.

In September 2024, The Spectator was acquired by British hedge fund manager Paul Marshall, owner of UnHerd and co-owner of GB News [I cover some of this here Mapping the British Media].

The Roger Scruton Legacy Foundation (RSLF) is heavily funded by the Hungarian government-backed Mathias Corvinus Collegium (MCC), receiving over £500,000 since 2023.  Murray delivered the 2022 Roger Scruton Memorial Lecture series at Oxford, which was organised by the foundation. While other fellows in the Hungary-backed network (such as Rod Dreher) have received reported payments of $8,750 a month, similar specific figures for Douglas Murray from the RSLF are not public. We do know though, for example, according to Byline Times [Matt Goodwin’s Lucrative Hungarian Fellowship Could Be in Line for the Chop Following Orbán’s Defeat:
“As non-profit campaigners Good Law Project noted in February, visiting fellows at MCC are reportedly paid between €5,000 and €10,000 per month – “plus housing, office space, health insurance” and other expenses. Reform has denied Matt Goodwin was paid €10,000 a month, though did not reveal the precise figure.” 
The links between the MCC, the Roger Scruton Foundation and the Spectator are clear: Spectator editor and former minister Michael Gove and Reform UK’s policy chief Prof James Orr are trustees of the RSLF.

Douglas Murray, Frank Furedi and Therapy Culture

Douglas Murray came to prominence most recently in November 2023 when a clip was circulated in which he muses that “if the army will not be sent in then the public will have to sort this out themselves and it’ll be very brutal“:

In January 2011, Douglas Murray stated that, in relation to the English Defence League: “If you were ever going to have a grassroots response from non-Muslims to Islamism, that would be how you’d want it, surely.”

His slurs and smears of Humza Yousaf are also well known:

These are the networks at risk by the collapse of Orbán’s Fidesz party. Unsurprisingly, the recipients of Orbán’s largesse are furious. Here Frank Furedi rails against the loss of his benefactor [Why Viktor Orbán lost]:

“The defeat of Orbán and Fidesz represents a major setback for conservative, populist-minded movements in the West. More than any other individual, the now former Hungarian prime minister personified the national-sovereigntist, anti-globalist outlook that has made so much headway over the past decade.”

Furedi’s analysis of Orbán’s defeat is remarkable:

“The main driver of this generational disaffection was the powerful influence exerted on them by Western identity politics and, underpinning it, therapy culture, with its emphasis on victimhood and vulnerability. The influence of therapy culture and the increasing focus on individual psychology and identity have tended to detach young people from the traditional, conservative values of Fidesz. In effect, many young Hungarians hold attitudes closer to those of their Western peers than the older members of their own society.”

Furedi concludes: “Supporters of the government appeared to be oblivious to the fact that they not only were facing a culture war – they were losing it, too.”

It’s not clear that the collapse of the Orbán regime will lead to the disintegration of its networks, many of which are already richly endowed – Dan Nolan at Democracy for Sale has pointed out that “MCC Brussels declared income of more than €6.3 million in 2024” [How Orban Built an Ideological Network in the UK]. But by exposing the funding sources we can begin to map the media networks that have such a malign influence on public life.

Update: Péter Magyar, the new Hungarian prime minister, says CPAC was paid by the Hungarian government and will not be any longer. He has said: The state will not finance these things, neither the event called CPAC nor other related institutions such as the Mathias Corvinus Collegium and similar attached bodies. I believe the state should never have financed them in the first place, it was a crime. Mixing party financing with government spending from the state budget is, in my view, a criminal offense, and this will have to be investigated by the future authorities, including the National Office for the Recovery and Protection of Public Assets, since those budgetary funds were not meant to finance party events. CPAC is welcome to come to Budapest, very welcome, but it should not be financed with Hungarian taxpayers’ money. It should be funded by Fidesz, or by Orbán’s proxies, at least until that money is taken back.

Comments (10)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Graeme Purves says:

    There is no shortage of dark money sloshing about on the far-right. Behind the scenes there will be some frantic adjustments to financial arrangements and, in the short term, some of its prominent proponents will be deeply unsettled by the loss of an important source of income.

  2. James Scott says:

    ‘ … According to the investigative outlet Follow The Money, MCC is conservative, nationalist and Eurosceptic, and “plays a key role in spreading the ideology of the Hungarian government”. ‘

    Cf:

    BBC (aka: the Beeb) all channels; most definitely not ‘just’ the WS which is currently 1/3 paid for by the FO ?
    British Council?
    UK Sport?

    From my local, friendly AI supplier I learn:

    UK Soft Power Group: A non-governmental network (convened by the British Council and British Foreign Policy Group) that advises the government and brings together key soft power actors.

    What is the role of NGO’s in Holyrood and how many of them opposed Nicola or Patrick’s eminently rational and popular plans ?

    What are all those EU sponsored NGO’s doing with the monies voted to them?

    Answers?

  3. Cynicus says:

    “…..the Revolutionary Communist Party, for more than 25 years––has made the transition from revolutionary Marxism into the fold of white-nationalist authoritarianism…”
    ========

    In doing so, it repeats the voyage across the wine-dark sea of ideology pioneered by the Trotskyite split from the New York City College communists in the 1940s. They ended up as the neoconservatives. It doesn’t usually take 70+ years for an American fad to wash up here.

  4. Stephen Cowley says:

    Roger Scruton was an English conservative philosopher who taught in the Soviet block before its collapse and was viewed with gratitude by some former dissidents there, hence the “Foundation” named after him. Conservatism is of course hardly “far right”, though Scruton occasionally acknowledged an awareness of far right thinking when it was prudent to do so. He was an opponent of Thatcherism, more of a Burkean traditionalist in politics.

    1. John S Warren says:

      The long established, and very long influencing Conservatism of Sir Joseph Ball (over fifty years a major player), wasn’t far-right?

      1. Stephen Cowley says:

        He sounds like Archibald Maule Ramsay, who succeeded Gladstone as MP for Midlothian, and opposed the war party (Churchill, Vansittart) in the Conservatives in the 1930s. The BBC made a programme about them (look up Tyler Kent). I’d have to admit they were far right, but they were a fringe group.

    2. I was lectured in Political Philosophy by Roger Scruton so I know exactly who and what he is.

  5. Stiubhart Stuart says:

    you are better to see the change in Hungary not as any great progressive on neo-liberal victory but more in line with what happened in Poland, the country is still socially conservative and has a ethnocentric immigration policy, but what has changed is the control of the judiciary and media to some extent, and orientation to the EU, this is what has exactly happened in Hungary, as anyone who watched the coverage will have noticed is the amount of anti Russian chants, as well as the an estimated 18 to 35 billion euros to be released as grants by the EU, in other words doesn’t have to be paid back. Maga was never, and will never be a coherent agenda except for the enrichment by disenchantment, the sovereignty thing that Orban was meant to espouse was never a reality, it was always a convenient front that suited him as a diversion to his own corruption just like trump. this says it all https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVkUt1m3FpY about trump, and it seems we now have a new form of wacky maga unionism on the net now check this out, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kcNjwW5KZ38, Obh obh!

    1. Yes an analysis of what the actual politics of the new party of government are would have to be the subject of a separate article.

      1. Stiubhart Stuart says:

        the last link seems to be from a content creator in Serbia hence the anti Catalan and anti Scottish tropes.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.