The Bowling Green Together


Early on during the Covid 19 Pandemic I discovered the actual meaning of “climbing the walls.” Grounded in Glasgow inside a tenement flat with two nursery aged children and no immediate means of returning to Shetland I looked to local outdoor spaces for relief. Being used to the freedom of running feral in the great Shetland outdoors, my young twins had literally taken to picking gloss paint off the interior woodwork and plaster off the walls of our flat, such was their distress at being cooped up inside.

Our initial attempts to find a nearby green safe-haven failed spectacularly. The trip to an almost deserted Pollock Park saw us confronted in minutes by a white man shouting racial abuse at my children, who despite being metres away from him were apparently still too close for his comfort.

Stressed and frazzled I bundled the kids home. My next attempt were the local allotments where I had taken the children for gardening sessions at the local urban garden project where there was a spacious common green. We lasted half an hour there.

The children were playing happily on the green when a white middle class hippie couple who were tending to their allotment, queried our right to be there. “You don’t actually have a plot here do you?” They stated in cold, glass tones whilst eyeballing my playing children.

I held my ground saying that the common was surely free to be used by all. The Bob Dylan T-shirt wearing, pony-tailed man was quick to inform me that that wasn’t the case – the allotment committee had declared that only plot-holders could use the space during the pandemic. Despite their nods to counter culture this couple were clearly ensconced in their liberal Good Life fantasy.

With stress tears stinging in my eyes I asked them if they didn’t mind my kids playing for a little while longer. “Sorry. Rules…I mean if we let you in then…” Slightly shrugging and backing away as they spoke. “You can see our dilemma,” the couple explained, clearly anticipating swarms and floodgates rupturing their little Scottish Eden, their equivalent of an “English Country Garden”, the purity of which must be maintained at all costs. I imagine in between urban farming, recycling, signing online petitions and posting Black Lives Matter memes on Facebook these fine and good people were too time-poor to exercise actual acts of compassion.

(Dandelion harvest festival at the BG with Freedom From Torture, Urban Roots, The Bowling Green)

We left disheartened and walked around the corner to the bottom of Kenmure Street, where we saw that the gates to the Bowling Green were open. We stood on the threshold looking in at the inviting green space and were met by a smiling, gallus, Pakistani woman who encouraged us to come in and make ourselves at home. That was my first encounter with Tabassum Niamet and the beginning of my relationship with this verdant local community space that became vital to me and my family’s mental health. I know that if I hadn’t met Tabassum that day and been welcomed so warmly by her, I wouldn’t have had the courage to try and access another outdoor space where I may have had to navigate racism or the policing of the space by white people. I cannot state how highly I value the Bowling Green. The fact that my family weathered the pandemic as well as it did is in part due to the access we had to a quality, green space within our community. We are now supposedly in post-pandemic times and my family and I have continued to be regulars there until the gates locked unexpectedly on September 13th.

The Bowling Green is managed by the Pollokshields Trust, a charity registered with the Scottish Charity Regulator and states in its objectives that it has been formed to “benefit the community of Pollokshields… by maintaining, improving and regenerating its physical, economic, social and cultural infrastructure, and assisting people who are at a disadvantage because of their social and economic circumstances; To advance protection or improvement of the Community through the preservation and conservation of the natural environment, the maintenance, improvement or provision of environmental amenities for the Community, the provision of other environmental and regeneration projects and/or the preservation and conservation of buildings or sites of architectural, historic or other importance to the Community.” The trust is also a community employer with a handful of jobs, all but one of which have abruptly been terminated.

In many places around the world there is an idea that land is held in trust and as much to Pachu Mama as it is to human beings who occupy that land. The idea of ownership in this context has a certain liminality. Land held in trust is very differently understood and translated in Scotland via institutions like the Crown or the National Trust and on a local level organisations like the Pollokshields Trust that are usually made up of people with a local connection to and interest in the land. My family and I, like many other users from the Pollokshields East community assume that the trust holds the land in trust for all. However recent events suggest otherwise.

It was a surprise to recently hear that the Trust had agreed to Police Scotland hosting an event on the Bowling Green. This was an insensitive and tone-deaf decision on many counts including the fact that Brown and Black bodies are disproportionately policed and that many of the regular users of the Bowling Green have legitimate grounds and actual lived experience that causes them to be wary of the Police and similar institutions. The Bowling Green is on Kenmure Street, Glasgow G41, the same street where the local community gathered to prevent our neighbours being taken by immigration services and the police. I remember Tabussum and others from the Bowling Green protesting alongside me and hundreds of others who spontaneously gathered to halt the immigration raid. It was poignant too to note that when the Trust closed the gates, it put up a notice in English only when in fact the space was predominantly used by Urdu, Punjabi and Arabic speakers. It makes me wonder, who does the Pollokshields Trust think their core constituent group is?

Today an Open Letter from the community has emerged asking that the Pollokshields Trust relinquish control of the space and surrender it to a community body that actually reflects the needs and interests of residents. The letter also suggests that staff have been unfairly dismissed or made redundant.

Yesterday Tabassum Niamet confirmed in a social media post, whilst paying tribute to her local community, that she had indeed been made redundant. Last week a private letter from local residents was sent to the Trust asking for clarification regarding the enforced closure of a community asset without consultation. A response from the chair cited ‘staff shortages’ and the need for ‘the land to rest’. All of which has been refuted by former staff including gardeners.

The fact is that the real success of the Bowling Green is built entirely on the relationships and hard work within the community that Tabassum and her team nurture and maintain and can only be sustained through consistent support, acknowledgement and encouragement from a Trust that values their staff and recognises that they are the living interface with the actual community the Trust is set up to serve. The Pollokshield’s Trust has revealed itself to be a community organisation that doesn’t recognise the lived experience of the local people it works with and employs. A Trust that appears not to acknowledge the precariousness many people in the community face, terminating staff employment with vague offers of future re-employment and suggestions that funding is an issue. If there is no money to pay staff, as they have been told, why are there board members on the Trust who are paid to fundraise?

We know that community has been systematically eroded over the years and we understand that we live within a system that cultivates individuation and discourages collective care and responsibility. It’s hard work to create alternative structures that don’t succumb to this. It’s sadly far too common to have community bodies, places of worship, school boards and even local pieces of land held in trust lapse into personal fiefdoms and prosaic empires benefiting the few. Let me be clear, I am not impartial in this. The Bowling Green matters to me and mine. Since hearing the news I have been thinking about how do we, in community, demand accountability when an organisation fails to live up to its stated values? What are the values of these organisations and how do they actually translate into the way they value their constituents and how do they reflect these values in the way they treat their staff? Do we want our community enterprises and trusts to mimic the machine like institutions that wear us down individually and collectively? Or do we want and deserve something different? Who are we trying to be if we continually recreate oppressive structures?

You can find out more about the Bowling Green and the community led initiative to take control of it’s management and sign up to offer solidarity here.

 

 

 

Comments (23)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published.

  1. Ann Rayner says:

    What a sad story. i hope the matter can be resolved and the local community can stull have access, along with workers being reinstated. The acion of the committee is disgarceful.

    1. Mr E says:

      Maybe it would be interesting to hear from the local community rater than from someone who apparently lives 500 miles away?

      1. Rory says:

        Ah yes, because noone has ever moved house.

  2. Dougie Blackwood says:

    We maybe are not as welcoming as we like to think we are.

  3. Jim Monaghan says:

    Nobody on the board is “paid to fundraise” or paid at all. The Board do not “hold the land in Trust” the land is owned by United Wholesale and is leased by the Trust for this community project. The board are, in fact, 6 local volunteers, 4 women, 2 men, 4 of them BAME representatives who live nearby and are heavily involved in the project as volunteers.

    1. Johnny M says:

      Well if the records on company’s house is accurate an individual who created the board in the first place and became a trustee of the board was then later eventually given a paid job to attain funding for the project ? And how many times have we seen people of colour being propped up into high positions simply for visibility – with no real change or benefit to the very people/communities they represent??

    2. Dr Melissa Espinoza says:

      There doesn’t seem to be any publically accessible annual reports that discuss the funding available and or raised in detail or at all. From what is available publicly it does show that the current general manager of the Bowling Green according to their LinkedIn was also the chairperson. This would be a lot clearer if the Trust was more transparent in their information.

      “BAME” populations are not a monolith. To suggests that just because there are 4 people of colour on the board doesn’t negate that harm has been perpetuated. The grouping of “BAME” populations is and has been problematic. To suggest that because “BAME” populations simply exists on the board it is impossible for other “BAME” experiences to exists is dangerous and classic tokenism.

      I am not understanding why people have made redundant in the way they have and why the board did not intervene if it has been a funding issue?

      1. Jim Monaghan says:

        Yes, sorry, I didnt mean it like that. I wasnt suggesting that it negated anything, I was trying to give a view of the board as they are – local volunteers at the Bowling Green, part of the local community. The article above gives the impression that the Board are somehow detached from the project. The four people I refer to are four Muslim women of different origins who all are active in the Bowling Green and live in East Pollokshields. The Chair is a volunteer, she was asked to join the board by staff, due to poor governance. She is not the General Manager. I dont think there as job title of General Manager?

  4. A resident says:

    There maybe a slight error we are aware that the trustees are unpaid volunteers and thank you for your knowledge about the trust and who own the land. It seems like you know more about whats going on behind the scenes than the community. We have never been invited until recently as a community to come to the bowling green and give our views and so forth how convenient since it has come to light that the main employee has been made redundant is this because they have no funds then say it. My view we have all been kept in the dark which is unacceptable from the trust and have no faith in what they bring to the table come 05/11/22.

    1. Jim Monaghan says:

      What I said above is common knowledge n the community. Who wouldn’t know? They are all people involved in the project. Everyone nows that the land is owned by the cash and carry. But anyway, here is a statement form the Board posted on their FB page.
      Statement by Fatima Uygun, Chair, on behalf of the Board of The Pollokshields Trust.

      Hello friends and neighbours,
      I, along with Joe Donnelly and Sarra Wassu joined The Pollokshields Trust Board late last year on the request of Tabassum Niamat and other staff members who were concerned about governance, lack of planning, lack of staff support and poor management.
      STATE OF PLAY
      On joining the Board we discovered that there were no policies, no staff contracts or job descriptions, line management or support for staff members. There was little or no monitoring or evaluations or public accountability. Many of the events that took place violated our public liability insurance, health and safety legislation and were carried out without risk assessments.
      Wages had been set at an unrealistic level, well above the standard for the sector. This meant that, going forward, it would be impossible to find public funding for wages at this level. We found our cash flow in a crisis situation with almost every penny going to subsidise staff wages.
      This is not about blame. Volunteers, staff and project partners worked tirelessly to make The Bowling Green such a huge success. However, as is all too common with successful grassroots projects, important issues such as those mentioned above, are not prioritised. Getting things done became the priority to the detriment and management of the project. Grant funds were re-profiled into paying staff wages with little investment in infrastructure and forward planning. In short, we were sprinting before we even learnt to walk.
      WHAT WE DID
      Since the new Board came in in November 2021 it has delivered the following:
      1. Recruited key individuals to the Board. We now have 6 very active members of the Board, 4 of whom are BAME and women and 3 are under the age of 30. All are involved in community development locally. Two are on the Board of the Quad. One is a highly successful fundraiser. Another involved heavily with heritage and the built environment.
      We recognise as volunteers we have our own limited experience and limited spare time. The has been a lot of talk about The Bowling Green in recent weeks with some great comments and ideas from people who are committed and very much part of the Bowling Green family. We would be delighted if some of those people come forward to add their experience and skills to the Board.
      2. Monthly formal minuted Board meetings took place without fail.
      3. Board members were given job descriptions and training through GCVS on their respective roles.
      4. Board and staff took taken part in three development days to discuss planning and strategy for the organisation and we have more planned for the coming months.
      5. The Board have systematically updated our policies and procedures with particular emphasis on HR and Volunteering. We now have a complaints policy as well as proper risk assessments and commitment to H&S at the Bowling Green. We are currently looking at developing an access strategy for the Bowling Green to ensure it is fully accessible for all.
      6. We have developed and implemented a robust funding strategy with the aim of securing long term core funding for The Pollokshields Trust. We have applied for a total of £540k, much of which is multi year funding. We will know the outcome of these funding applications within the next few months. One of which is The Glasgow Communities Fund which we failed to get last time around due to the poor governance of the Trust at the time.
      7. We have signed memorandum of understanding with our partners to ensure compliance and agreed outputs.
      8. All our staff were issued proper contracts and job descriptions and on wages commensurate with the sector.
      9. A Community Consultation Day has been arranged on the 5th of November to inform a development plan for TPT for the coming 12 months. We plan to schedule these in for every 6 months.
      10. We are in the process of joining the Development Trust Association of Scotland as a Community Led Anchor organisation.
      Finally, and most importantly, we have been negotiating a 25 year lease with the owner to ensure the Bowling Green remains safe in community ownership for the long term.
      We have done all this as volunteers. Any charitable organisation will tell you that this is a massive achievement in less than 12 months.
      Unfortunately by the summer, despite our fundraising efforts, it became clear that we would not have sufficient funds to carry our project, as it stood, to the end of the financial year. We considered, as a duty of care to our staff, that we would be up front and open about how this would affect their jobs going forward. The Board decided to issue a notice of redundancy giving staff a highly generous 11 weeks notice in the hope that funding would appear before the end of their redundancy date.
      Unfortunately, the environment for charities and community organisations is not good right now. Funds are limited and there is a lot of competition. You will all have seen recent news stories of charities, community organisations, venues and cultural organisations going to the wall due to a lack of funding.
      Currently the Bowling Green has been temporarily closed due to a lack of funding and staff shortages. Very limited activities are taking place. The feeding of the chickens and repairs and refurbishments are being carried out by volunteers. We would normally be closing down for the winter around now.
      What limited grant income we currently have is going towards paying a long-term volunteer, to keep the premises secure and maintained.
      GOING FORWARD
      In October, we notified the community of a Community Consultation Day on the 5th of November at which we hope to explore options to ensure that the Bowling Green is kept open. One idea we would like to explore is giving the users and volunteers of the Bowling Green a real say in the organising, management and delivery of the project.
      We are encouraged by the community response to the potential of losing the Bowling Green as a community asset and hope to channel that energy towards setting up such a group, that will be an integral part of the governance and management of the Bowling Green project moving forward.
      We would like to remind people, once again, that the Board of Trustees are local people and volunteers who got involved at the request of Tabassum and other staff members and share your enthusiasm for the long term sustainable development of the Bowling Green.
      However, despite us all being on the same side, things have become quite hostile very recently. We ask that the abuse of Board members stop.
      Board members have been locked out of social media accounts, been on the end of online gossip, ad hominem attacks and allegations of hidden agendas, including one Board member who has had their home targeted. This needs to stop.
      We ask that all discussion remain respectful.
      We look forward to seeing as many people as possible at the Community Consultation Day on the 5th of November at the Bowling Green.
      On behalf of The Pollokshields Trust Board
      Fatima Uygun, Chair
      Sarra Wassu, Secretary
      Joe Donnelly
      Maariyah Afzal
      Zarafshan Hussain
      Niall Murphy

      1. Jim Stamper says:

        As an outsider to your area I hope all goes well with your meeting on 5th November and you manage to come together to have this community facility working well for your community.
        Best wishes to you all.

      2. Kevin Mulhern says:

        So this bowling green which was used as a community garden is owned by a cash and carry, this begs the question, what reason would a cash and carry have to own a bowling green? Should they not be focusing on running a cash and carry rather than acquiring property like bowling greens and how are they making enough profit to be able to do this? I guess this is one of many insanities of attempting to live in capitalism, the primacy of property ownership.

        Jim the letter you posted above, has a lot of words like, procedures, policies, recruitment, meetings… If your mission to have a community space but at the same time placing a piece of paper on the gate saying the bowling green cannot be used, it seems like the one thing the community wants and what this ‘board’ is there for is the one thing that you failing to privide.

        I’m reminded by the comment at the top of the article from the allotment owner “Sorry. Rules” … maybe the rules are the problem. I don’t think that letter should sway anyone, the notice should be torn down and the community should just use the space, is that not what everyone wants. I feel that is the conclusion of Raman’s article.

        I have mentioned the late David Graeber on here before, there is a great quote from him – “the ultimate, hidden truth of the world is that it is something that we make, and could just as easily make differently.” the letter from the board is utterly uninspiring, and I hope that Raman and the other community members Pollokshields can make the future that actually serves them rather then hindering them.

        1. Jim Monaghan says:

          The cash and carry company own the land on which the bowling green and the cash and carry stand. The Bowling Club closed many years ago and it was an empty space that the Cash and carry company had hoped to build on. The Trust was formed to take over this space and others for the community. The initial lease was until 2021 then was extended for a year and the Trust are negotiating a 25 year lease right now. This prevents the company who own the cash and carry from developing the site. The reason it is closed is lack of staff at the moment but the project is working on training volunteers while trying to find funds for staffing. It cant be opened without supervision because of insurance, the chickens and the beehives. The community are not divided on this as the article suggests. the community know of the situation and are, by and large, supportive of the campaign, hoping to open, and be better placed to stay open, in Spring (its normally closed by this time of year anyway – opened later last year to host people attending COP26).

        2. 221101 says:

          ‘…“the ultimate, hidden truth of the world is that it is something that we make, and could just as easily make differently.”’

          Technically, this ‘truth’ is called ‘irrealism’. Žižek renders it as ‘Everything is ideology.’ It’s ‘true’ in consequence of the so-called ‘Death of God’ – the disappearance from the world of any absolute validating authority and the corresponding advent of relativism, under which all values become ‘exchange values’ rather than ‘real values’. For irrealists like Graeber, the ‘Death of God’ is itself an ideological consequence of capitalism and the way to restore ‘real value’ to the world is to facilitate the sublation of capitalism and the relations of ‘production’ or ‘value-creation’ by which it defines itself as a form of life – though that’s easier said than done!

      3. Resident G41 says:

        https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/mr-c-cubitt-v-the-pollokshields-trust-4105904-slash-2022

        “I did not have the benefit of hearing evidence from the respondent. However, the manner in which the respondent has approached these proceedings appeared to be consistent with the claimant’s experience: the trustees have other priorities; the responses are sporadic and infer that previous correspondence has not been considered or understood. I felt that it was significant that none of the allegation warnings to which the respondent referred in the termination letter recorded and appeared to be contrary to the comments in the letter sent to the claimant dated 19 August 2022

        I also considered that the claimant’s approach to the potential claims that he may have against the respondent was measured. In contrast, the respondent’s position appeared to be an embellishment and created after the fact.”

    2. 221031 says:

      Residents can, of course, always become members of the Trust, elect the directors they want at the Trust’s annual general meeting, and/or stand for election themselves. Under the auspices of the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator, the Trust’s constitution sets out clear democratic processes for its governance; it’s down to residents themselves to participate in those processes.

      It’s not a healthy situation that the Trust’s employees have to co-opt directors onto the Board. What’s required to improve that situation is that residents exchange their victimhood and dependency for agency, which it’s the medium-term task of community development trusts like the Pollockshields Trust to cultivate through its projects.

      It would be interesting to hear what the Trust is doing in pursuit of that task and how its progress in that respect is being democratically monitored by its membership.

      1. Jim Monaghan says:

        Its not a membership organisation at the moment. But the new board who came in to handle the funding crisis are looking to extend the governance much wider with more user and volunteer involvement in decisions. The two groups who have launched this week (who are perhaps the same people as they are all un-named) have been invited to get involved.

        1. 221101 says:

          Sorry! I thought I saw a ‘Become a Member’ link on one of the Trust’s websites.

          I’d consider membership and its democratic ownership of the organisation and its operations as both an essential prerequisite of and a vehicle for community development. How do you develop a community without empowering it in its own development?

          1. Jim Monaghan says:

            there are many ways of doing that. For instance, today I attended Galgael’s monthly assembly. It should be noted that the former Bowling Club was a membership organisation. The members decided to sell the land to the Cash and carry.

  5. G41 says:

    A good organisation would have been transparent about their financial problems – if the board had told the public that jobs were at risk, before employees got a redundancy notice, then we would have done something to help. Instead the board tried to mislead the public… while telling the staff members they were not allowed to tell anyone about their redundancies!?

    Also TPT recently included two more brown board members recently to make themselves look better, but they are carefully selected friends of another board member.

    The Pollokshields Trust has now proved their inability to run the space, so they need to stop making excuses and hand it back to the community. There’s no other option at this point

  6. Concerned G41 Resident says:

    As a local resident of G41 whose family enjoyed the Bowling Green regularly I share Raman’s perspective on the situation. I want to offer my solidarity to Tabassum and the other workers who have had their employment ended by Trust. They worked tirelessly to make the place as successful as it was and I am appalled by the way they have been treated. The voices of the workers are absent here and it would be useful to hear from them directly but what we now know as a community is that they were asked by the Trust not to reveal publicly that they were being made redundant. Furthermore, because many of them have current grievances in process, they have been unable to speak up out of fear.

    Regarding Jim’s comment about BAME representation, can I just refer you to Pritti Patel, Suella Braverman and their BAME colleagues and leave you to join up the dots.
    Regarding his comment about the issue of land in trust – whether you own the land or rent the land using public money to offer services to the local community, trust is a key component and in that regard the Bowling Green is indeed held in “trust” by the Pollokshields Trust.

    May I also point out something worrying – Admin for the local online community page has refused any posts related to the Bowling Green closure. The Bowling Green Together’s open letter asking pertinent questions and requesting that the management of the land to be handed over to them is also been refused. Perhaps this is because the Admin of the community page is also the Chairperson of the Trust.

    I sincerely hope that the landlords take note of the concerns being raised here and that the lease is peacefully transferred to TBGT as soon as possible. If the Pollokshields Trust have any concern for the community they were set up to serve, they should recognise that they have lost the trust and support of community and in the spirit of Kenmure Street, should recognise when to step back and relinquish control and allow a new chapter for Bowling Green begin.

  7. G41 RESIDENT says:

    As a local resident of G41 whose family enjoyed the Bowling Green regularly I share Raman’s perspective on the situation. I want to offer my solidarity to Tabassum and the other workers who have had their employment ended by Trust. They worked tirelessly to make the place as successful as it was and I am appalled by the way they have been treated. The voices of the workers are absent here and it would be useful to hear from them directly but what we now know as a community is that they were asked by the Trust not to reveal publicly that they were being made redundant. Furthermore, because many of them have current grievances in process, they have been unable to speak up out of fear.

    Regarding Jim’s comment about BAME representation, can I just refer you to Pritti Patel, Suella Braverman and their BAME colleagues and leave you to join up the dots.
    Regarding his comment about the issue of land in trust – whether you own the land or rent the land using public money to offer services to the local community, trust is a key component and in that regard the Bowling Green is indeed held in “trust” by the Pollokshields Trust.

    May I also point out something worrying – Admin for the local online community page has refused any posts related to the Bowling Green closure. The Bowling Green Together’s open letter asking pertinent questions and requesting that the management of the land to be handed over to them is also been refused. Perhaps this is because the Admin of the community page is also the Chairperson of the Trust.

    I sincerely hope that the landlords take note of the concerns being raised here and that the lease is peacefully transferred to TBGT as soon as possible. If the Pollokshields Trust have any concern for the community they were set up to serve, they should recognise that they have lost the trust and support of community and in the spirit of Kenmure Street, should recognise when to step back and relinquish control and allow a new chapter for Bowling Green begin.

  8. Resident G41 says:

    https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/mr-c-cubitt-v-the-pollokshields-trust-4105904-slash-2022

    I believe this verdict for the Gardner who was unfairly dismissed speaks volumes about The Pollokshields Trust and vindicates all those who have raised concerns including the author of this piece.

    ““I did not have the benefit of hearing evidence from the respondent. However, the manner in which the respondent has approached these proceedings appeared to be consistent with the claimant’s experience: the trustees have other priorities; the responses are sporadic and infer that previous correspondence has not been considered or understood. I felt that it was significant that none of the allegation warnings to which the respondent referred in the termination letter recorded and appeared to be contrary to the comments in the letter sent to the claimant dated 19 August 2022

    I also considered that the claimant’s approach to the potential claims that he may have against the respondent was measured. In contrast, the respondent’s position appeared to be an embellishment and created after the fact.”

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.