Stochastic Violence From Moygashel to McArthur Park
The Fascist Atmosphere is everywhere, from the livestreaming of genocide to the Vice-Singalling of the far-right and their media apologists, and now manifests itself in the migrants’ effigy on a loyalist bonfire. This is a global phenomenon characterised by the denial of reality, hatred of ‘the other’ and extreme and wild conspiracism.
We are waiting for the high point of bigotry in the British Isles. Here, Loyalists in County Tyrone celebrate burning refugees alive. It’s not a ‘cultural celebration’, it’s a festival of hate that’s permitted to dominate whole cities and intimidate whole communities in a way that no other cult is. As Emma DeSouza has noted: “Celebrating one’s own culture should not require the oppression of another’s. Free speech does not give one licence to hate speech without consequence. Twelfth bonfires adorned with symbols of hate are not about protest; they are targeted hate crimes and should be treated as such.”

This fusion of bigotry, xenophobia and spectacle fascism is rudimentary, everyday now and spools across the Irish Sea and back and forth across the Atlantic. The far-right watches itself through Palantír and we watch their performative violence on the streets of America, in the debris of Gaza, and atop the pallets of County Tyrone. It is a global phenomenon with local manifestations.
Amnesty International described the bonfire, to be lit at Moygashel, outside Dungannon, as “a vile dehumanising act that fuels racism and hatred. Sinn Fein Assembly Member Colm Gildernew described it as “vile” and “deplorable.”
Searchlight reports that: “It’s clear this involves the most extreme loyalists, who find support from fascists on the mainland – the British Democrats have been quick to boast of having activists in place at the recent violent Ballymena pogroms where migrant houses were also set ablaze.”
“And Tommy Robinson’s right-hand man Richard Inman has been ever present there, live streaming events online.”
“Britain First leader Paul Golding, Tommy Robinson, and indeed most fascist and racist activists, have welcomed these acts of violence. Loyalism of the boat-burning type has deep and terrible roots in Northern Ireland. It combines fascist political extremism with racism and terrorism.”
The contagion of far-right ideology and stochastic violence is out of control. The far-right is now unhinged, even within its own grotesque ‘rationale’. As Nick Cohen notes (Extremism sweeps the British right): “Something macabre is stirring in the soul of the British right. Driven half mad by the failure of Brexit and Liz Truss, it has doubled down on fanaticism. It prefers to push harder and faster to the extremes than face its own shortcomings. Ideas that Conservatives themselves would once have dismissed as fascistic now produce barely a mumble of dissent.”
Cohen has a puzzle: Who said this?
“The old political parties, the old Whitehall institutions, the old media, the old universities, the old courts constitute a political regime. This regime has become cancerous. The cancer has metastasised and the cancer is attacking everything healthy in the country; all the healthy institutions and healthy impulses are the target of Whitehall.”
As Cohen says, it might have been a member of the British Union of Fascists in the 1930s, but it is, in fact Dominic Cummings, the former adviser to Boris Johnson and the architect of Brexit who now attacks Farage from the right.
This sequence of failure is now self-reinforcing. The debacle of Brexit is proof, for them, of the need for even more extreme measures and projects. The only unquestionable institution or project is Brexit itself.
America at War With Itself
Across the Atlantic, the USA’s descent into fascism is remarkable and disturbing. As Mike Brock writes (The Secret Police Are Here):
“Let us examine what Congress has actually authorized, since apparently no one else wishes to do so with any precision. ICE now commands resources that would make it the sixteenth largest military force on the planet. The $150 billion allocated for immigration enforcement through 2029 exceeds the annual military budgets of Canada, Italy, and Israel combined. This isn’t immigration policy. This is the systematic construction of a domestic terror apparatus funded at the level of a regional superpower’s defense establishment.”
Brock continues: “The agency operates under arrest quotas of 3,000 people per day, one million per year, with constitutional compliance treated as an administrative suggestion rather than legal requirement.”
“This is the language of systematic state terror operating under the banner of law enforcement. When federal agents are explicitly encouraged to arrest innocent people to meet numerical targets, when constitutional protections become negotiable based on bureaucratic convenience, when American citizenship provides no protection against unmarked federal kidnapping—we have moved decisively beyond the realm of policy disagreement into territory that has a very specific historical designation.”
Last week they were zip-tying disabled people in their wheelchairs, this week the scenes from McArthur Park, Los Angeles look like some post-apocalyptic movie. America is invading itself:
Heavily armed Trump regime forces raided at McArthur Park, a public park in Los Angeles, harassing and terrorizing civilians during their ethnic cleansing operation. (🎥: @Julio_Rosas11) 🧵 #3E #StopICE pic.twitter.com/qjLRoqbWkZ
— Anonymous (@YourAnonCentral) July 8, 2025
It may be that Trump (or Miller) is, as many have suggested, be practicing for Martial Law. Or he could just be normalising the optics of troops in the streets. Or he could just adding to the atmosphere of generalised fear and intimidation.
The problem here, as Mike Brock points out, is one of journalistic and intellectual capitulation:
“The professional moderates who populate our discourse want us to believe we’re witnessing complex policy disagreements requiring sophisticated analysis. But we’re not. We’re documenting systematic constitutional violations designed to terrorize human beings into submission, funded by disaster relief money, implemented through arrest quotas that treat innocent people as acceptable “collateral damage.”
This is the common denominator across these arenas of what we’re still euphemistically calling “populism”: dehumanisation. It’s dehumanisation that allows refugees to be on top of the pyre, that allows anyone to be “collateral damage” in America’s state kidnapping programme, for disabled people to be portrayed as scroungers or for ethnic cleansing to be carried out in Palestine.
It’s going to get worse. Timothy Snyder has talked of the ‘normalisation of horror’ saying: “The government is putting before us the temptation to cooperate in fascist dehumanization on a grand scale” and warned of “the prospect of many great harms, including an archipelago of concentration camps across the United States.”
The Plot
In his 1995 essay “Ur-Fascism”, cultural theorist Umberto Eco lists fourteen general properties of fascist ideology… He uses the term “Ur-Fascism” as a generic description of different historical forms of fascism. Taking a checklist today against Eco’s essay is sobering. Try it.
Number 7 is currently in play, certainly the “followers feel besieged” in Moygashel.

Over in Texas, ‘the plot’ is wild. The flash floods that took the lives of over 100 people has become the epicentre of the latest and wildest conspiracies. As freelancer Ben Makuch reports: “Some people, emerging from the same vectors associated with the longstanding QAnon conspiracy theory, which essentially holds that a shadowy “deep state” is acting against Donald Trump, spread on X that the devastating weather was being controlled by the government.”
“I NEED SOMEONE TO LOOK INTO WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS,” posted Pete Chambers, a former special forces commander and frequent fixture on the far right who once organized an armed convoy to the Texas border, along with documents he claimed to show government weather operations. “WHEN WAS THE LAST CLOUD SEEDING?”
Cloud Seeding and the Chemtrails are now a permanent fixture in the besieged imaginary, impervious to rational discourse or the intervention of facts. In this petri dish of idiocy, the lines are blurred between former government advisors and MAGA influencers, as Cummings whines, “the cancer is attacking everything healthy in the country; all the healthy institutions and healthy impulses are the target of Whitehall.”
The Big Bad City and Net Zero as the New Brexit
Looking across the pond is not to look afar but to look in our near future. The players often reflect each others tropes, language and paranoia. Trump’s aide Stephen Miller tweets: “NYC is the clearest warning yet of what happens to a society when it fails to control migration.” Across the ocean, British pundit Matthew Goodwin pronounces that London is “over . . . a city in visible decline” with “no real sense of identity” (Myth of the Big Bad Megacity).
This war on the city can be seen in the discourse around the ‘metropolitan elite’, in the racist smears against Sadiq Khan, in ICE deliberately targetting ‘Democrat’ cities, in the coming storm against Zohran Mamdani, and in the triggered response to the 15 Minute City idea (a now staple part of far-right storytelling – see 15 Minute Cities and the Nightmares of the Paranoid Right).
The other unifying force of these movements is an overwhelming hatred of ecological politics or climate realities. This has been a staple of the Spiked! agenda over decades, and a trigger for the right-adjacent press. This is what Ewan Jenkins called a ‘Suicidal Nostalgia’ and brings together a strange brew: “The anti-net zero coalition makes for a strange constellation of forces. A suicidal alliance of agrarian revanchists, fossil billionaires, cultural reactionaries, suburban conspiracy theorists and disillusioned voters who, in yet another historical repetition, turn their rage not against capital but toward the climate movement.”
As I noted in Diagonalism, the Cosmic Right and the Conspiracy Smoothie – this coalition is deeply immersed in conspiracy cultures:
“Naomi Klein referred to the “conspiracy smoothie” that unites many protesters. Sociologist Keir Milburn hazarded the coinage of “the cosmic Right.” Drawing lessons from the mass phenomenon that is Bolsonarismo, Brazilian philosopher Rodrigo Nunes described the protests as the latest manifestation of “denialism” born of an inability to come to terms with the enormity of challenges confronted by humankind.”
In Britain, these groups now coalesce around Net Zero as the New Brexit, fulfilling Point 2 of Umberto Eco’s checklist, the rejection of modernism.
Ewan Jenkins writes: “It should be uncontroversial to state that net zero is a false flag, a hollow stage of political theatre. But this empty signifier now galvanises a storm of reaction across the social spectrum. Net zero has become a “useful enemy” writes the Guardian. In the UK, “net zero has replaced the EU as the thing on which all our ills can be blamed” writes Shaun Spiers of the Green Alliance.”
The denialism and irrationalism is profound, America/England/Britain was great (we’re not sure when) and ‘we’ will be again. Everything is both broken and in crisis, but also Great and Fine. Nothing is wrong, so nothing should be changed.
As Nick Cohen notes, “the right fantasises about a blood-and-soil version of English nationalism that Conservatives once abhorred”, and you can see interplay between nativism, white nationalism, and surveillance tech exchanged through Farage and his Trump networks and finance.
In The Lure of Greatness, England’s Brexit and America’s Trump, Anthony Barnett explores the dynamics at play between Trumpism and Brexit. He writes: “In January 2017, Theresa May told an American audience that by leaving the European Union the United Kingdom had taken a decision to restore our national self-determination’. Even Scots, and Welsh who voted for Brexit will wince at the claim. She was speaking for England. In October 2016, in her set-piece speech to her own party, she spoke of the ‘divisive nationalists’ of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. At the same time, throughout the speech she refers repeatedly to Britain as a ‘nation’ – and how she intends to build a ‘new united Britain’. Apparently, her English nationalism is not divisive. It is unifying. It is British.”
Amazingly, by this logic, we achieved self-determination by voting against Brexit.
This renewed Anglo-British nationalism is another form of denialism. In the post-truth world, Britain is a single nation and we are living in the sunlit-uplands of a new united country. Just ask the people of Moygashel.
The Church of Ireland Archbishop of Armagh John McDowell has commented on the Moygashel bonfire effigy featuring a refugee boat, calling it : “racist, threatening and offensive,” “nothing to do with Christianity or Protestant culture”, and “is in fact inhuman and sub-Christian”.

As we go to press, it’s just been announced that “The PSNI has confirmed that it has taken the decision not to assist a request from Belfast City Council for the removal of material from a controversial south Belfast bonfire site.”
This article was first published on my Substack Fifty Six Degrees North. You can subscribe here.

Yet the Christian God is the God of Genocide, of cruel and unusual punishments, a God of Wrath and petty murder, jealous rage and irrational sadism, who literally drowned every boatload but one. And the Enlightenment was largely an attempt to throw off the oppression of Christian terror directed against intellectual endeavour. Glasgow genderists and their postmodern heroes are also enemies of the Enlightenment (which historical fault was only not going far enough to logical conclusions, retaining various conservative features), and tick many of Umberto Eco’s boxes.
As the likes of George Monbiot have pointed out, there are many conspiracies against public and planet, but the ones we know about tend to follow basic patterns like corporate capture of legislators through lobbying, covert state operations (like Spycops), and daily baths in propaganda and behavioural conditioning (which is nothing to do with coloured pills), coupled with omertas and silences, patronage of arts and sports and academia, ownership and partisan-political and religious influence over media, militarization and creeping (re)centralisation of power.
But these crude and violent signs the article speaks of are indications of losing arguments, hence a flight from reality and a subsequent spiral. Celebration of evil pasts leads to #karmaphobia. If you honour ancestors who were amongst the worst migrants in history, what else would feel but fear of the descendants of those that survived their colonialist depredations? Dick Inman, really? There certainly seem to be people celebrating the British Empire as a Big Gay Adventure, and much of this current fascism is redolent of the Sturmabteilung, or the peak of British imperial racial terror and genocide.
Sleeping dog, I’m not sure you’re right about the Christian God. The Jewish God certainly, even the Muslim God perhaps, but I think the Christian God is built upon the teachings of Christ ‘the Ark of the New Covenant’ which is ‘turn the other cheek’, and ‘let those without sin cast the first stone’ type of stuff. A simple test for those who use Christianity to cast stones at people is to listen to them. Mr. Vance for example might claim to be a Christian but his mouth belies it.
As to the article itself, Mike, once again this interplay between the USA and what goes on over here creates a false picture of reality. I don’t have much time to expand but the agents you talk about in the USA are government, those in NI are not. It is not surprising that people who hate Catholics also turn their attention to immigrants. I am surprised you are surprised by this. This bonfire has held figures of hate at its peak before, but nobody really bothered. I accept that PSNI is behaving badly over this as the signs on the pyre are hateful and thus break the law, however (and I am no apologist for PSNI) there may be other considerations in their decision making.
As for these commentators such as Klein, Monbiot etc. – it’s their job to write, they analyse everything and always through the same lens. Those they analyse are generally pigeon holed as ‘far right’ or fascist but to accept that brings the risk of missing accuracy. Who are these people? Are MAGA just the same as English nationalists? Is the blood and soil nationalism of the USA real? In a country of so many mixed races, can there be blood and soil nationalism? Is NI unionism blood and soil nationalism? Is Englishism actually a racist concept? Too many things left out of the analysis for the same if far-rightery’
I good comment. Too much stereotyping and lumping of stuff together here.
And the whole point about Christianity is the New Testament, the ‘good news’ which supersedes the Old. The tenets you mention, especially turn the other cheek are actually surprisingly radical and powerful, though not often followed. It is the very opposite of what SD describes which is the Old Testament God. And that is the point. Christianity is founded on the New Testament, not the Old.
@Niemand, so why is the Old Testament still in the Christian bible (if as you claim it is the ‘opposite’ of what Christians should believe)? Do Christians reject the genocides it contains? What secret origin story replaces it? Also, doesn’t the New Testament end in genocide? As far as I’m concerned, and I took the Philosophy of Religion course at uni which was perverted by the University chaplain into proselytising Christianity, Christians are mostly harmless fruitloops at best. And I’ve studied quite a bit on this, and even like some of the narratives. Loaves and fishes? Great stuff… only if you reject the miraculous. Historically… well, that’s why we had to invent progress. Golden rule… Christians claim they invented it, which is another reason why they are full of… the holy spirit.
The Old Testament is in the Bible because Jesus (“Have you not read…”) and the New Testament authors constantly cite it as background and context. The German Christian movement sought to reject it in the 1930s, but after a once-famous speech in Berlin, they were sidelined by the Protestant churches.
The Israelites engaged in warfare, which God instructs them to do per the text. This is widely regarded as a moral problem, but it’s there in the text. There is a divine covenant with them, but it is conditional on spreading the name of the Lord to the nations. This responsibility is then broadened to “those bringing forth the fruits thereof”. Some modern Jews object to this (as “supercessionism”), but the old promises still stand, they just aren’t as important as the new ones (e.g. the “great commission” of Matthew).
Yes, there is a (metaphorical?) separation of wheat and chaff at the end, the usual mixture of mercy and justice.
@Stephen Cowley, thanks for your explanation. I missed a hyphen: should have been mostly-harmless, which changes the meaning somewhat. I rather agree with philosopher Julian Baggini that Christianity doesn’t really have much ethics at all. It’s obey God, get rewards (disobey, experience eternal torture) sort of thing. Hence what’s-in-it-for-me Christianity and the Prosperity Gospel.
A rather more illustrious philosopher, Bertrand Russell, explains why he is not a Christian. The ethical aspects are dealt with from the chapter on The character of Christ onwards, covering the New Testament. I find his arguments convincing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJ_m67sF0kc&t=1104s
Here on Bella, Blindboy characterises the Irish Catholic church as fascist, its clerics devoting considerable planning to torturing women and children incarcerated in its institutions. The British Empire exported such Christian horrors too, and small skeletons are being dug up in its territories too.
“It is not surprising that people who hate Catholics also turn their attention to immigrants. I am surprised you are surprised by this.”
I’m not.
The nearest predecessor of ICE in the USA is Operation Wetback initiated by President Eisenhower in 1954, the general who defeated the main European fascist powers. The analogy of this with the fascism of the 1920s and 1930s seems tenuous by comparison. Trump has no militia or power to dissolve the constitution and is in office for a limited term, for example.
Trump has no militia? Cool cool cool
Unless you count the J6 rabble, I guess.
When the intelligentsia chose to marginalise national identity and the interests of the majority population in favour of an elitist, technocratic globalist hegemony, it fractured the social contract and destabilised the trajectory of the Western world.
The widespread deployment of minority-driven identity politics, paired with authoritarian tactics in pursuit of a perceived Neo-Marxist utopia, rendered the events you describe inevitable. In doing so, you’ve become the ideological counterpart to the far-right spectres you blame for the erosion of liberal democracy.
It’s as if you’ve forged a Golem to purge the unrighteous, only for it to gaze into your own hearts and find delusion, self-interest, and mendacity. The monster you created has turned on its creators. Own it.
You keep referencing Neo-Marxism, where is it and when can we move?
Your laughably incoherent attempt at deflection suggests that Mike’s article has made you uncomfortable. Perhaps it is time for you to own the dark destination of the ideology you have espoused.
Word salad Steve has been reading the darker corners of the Internet again!
Intelligentsia ? Well that would rule out inclusion of Reform and their supporters.
@Nazi Steve, ‘the People’s Princess’ (Evil Queen), your beloved Reform UK Party is a staunch defender of elitist privilege in the schools sector, stating in its Contract With You:
“Tax relief of 20% on all Independent Education
“No VAT on Fees. If parents can afford to pay a bit more, we should incentivise them to choose independent schools. This will significantly ease pressure on state schools and improve education for all.”
https://www.reformparty.uk/policies
I mean, spending the tax revenue on state kids would seem to achieve the claimed objective, and maybe closing elitist schools would stop social cheating and engender more national unity, but no, Nigel speaks for his peeps.
Why don’t you just come clean and admit you are a petty fraudster?
Unfortunate phrasing, I admit, if you’re still identifying as that exotic Man Among Men, Captain Manwhoring, mercenary to sado-regimes. As Google AI says:
“Mercenaries, due to their mobility and often unsanitary conditions, can act as disease vectors, facilitating the spread of infectious diseases, particularly vector-borne diseases. Their travels across different geographic locations, potentially carrying infected arthropods or contracting diseases themselves, can introduce or exacerbate outbreaks in new areas.”
But then it would.
What is your health policy, anyway? And why do you support elitist education?
Makes a change from ‘fenian bastards’ atop the bonfire. Unionist organisations in NI (& Orange Order in Scotland) have always been supremacist at heart and as such always require someone to look down on and vilify. I guess it’s migrants turn this year to be vilified by them.