2007 - 2020

An Open Letter to Glasgow City Council

An Open Letter to Glasgow City Council requesting the people of Glasgow lead the way on a city recovery plan focussed on well-being, justice and sustainability.

Dear Susan,

We hope you are safe and well during these unprecedented and challenging times.

We welcome Glasgow City Council (GCC) in establishing of the COVID 19 Economic Recovery Group, to consider how Glasgow begins to recover – and very importantly – renews from the pandemic.

However, we have significant concerns regarding the COVID-19 Economic Recovery Group’s ability to provide advice which will deliver the profound and radical changes needed to ensure the well-being of all Glasgow residents in an uncertain future.

We have identified and detailed two main challenges:

  • Scope and Remit[i] – This should be more ambitious, systemic and progressive by including broader perspectives, which go beyond a narrow and traditional framing of economic recovery centred on growth. To respond to the unprecedented challenges that we face from the COVD-19 pandemic and the climate and ecological emergencies, an economic recovery should be just and sustainable.
  • Composition and Process[ii] – This critical process has been removed from the people it primarily impacts. It should enable and facilitate the people of Glasgow to contribute and participate in the renewal of their city – a resident-led participatory process.

If GCC really believes that its PEOPLE MAKE GLASGOW then we encourage it to let its people lead the way in shaping its future. There is no group of experts who can better understand what Glasgow needs and who, we know, will be working in the best interests of everyone.

In light of these considerations, we call on GCC to dissolve the current COVID-19 Economic Recovery Group and replace it with a resident-led participatory process, whose remit will make binding recommendations on achieving the collective well-being of all residents of Glasgow, within planetary boundaries. The expertise of the Economic Recovery Group members and others can make still a valuable contribution to a process which has resident involvement at its centre, from the start.

We offer our support and willingness to be in dialogue and work together with GCC on the development of this process.

The situation demands urgency, but we believe getting the future right is more important than speed. Substantial expertise on participatory processes, a highly committed and engaged Glasgow civil society sector and a significant amount of policy knowledge from across sectors and perspectives already exist in Scotland. By building from this, Glasgow City Council is well positioned to enable and collaborate in a truly transformative process for this city.

The COVID-19 pandemic has already changed peoples’ lives immeasurably. There is a powerful sense that Glaswegians want and need something different. Ensuring a just, fair, and sustainable response to this crisis is the biggest responsibility and challenge we have collectively faced in decades. The depth of the economic crisis we now face means that making economic growth the driver of recovery will only result in the same uneven outcomes for the people who live here that we have been witnessing for decades.

We urge Glasgow City Council to exercise bravery, leadership and creativity in calling upon and trusting the people of Glasgow to shape our collective future. We ask, if not now, when will we Let Glasgow Flourish?

Signed,

 

Commonweal, Commonweal Glasgow, Divest Strathclyde, Enough (Scotland), Get Glasgow Moving, Glasgow Eco-Trust, Feminist Exchange Network, Peoples Health Movement Scotland, Alison Phipps OBE, Professor of Languages and Intercultural Studies Glasgow University, Planning Democracy, Propagate, The Common Good Awareness Project, The Peoples Bank of Govanhill, The S.A.N.E. Collective

 

[i] We note the Terms of Reference for this momentous work are not yet publicly available. However, we reference that ‘the group will consider data on the potential economic impact of the pandemic; and what this impact will mean when taking action on issues such as investment, business support and employment.’ This description indicates the work of this group will be largely driven by an economic model, which prioritises growth -over all else- as the way to achieve recovery. We assert that using a growth-based economic model to guide recovery, presents a fundamental challenge to delivering a better future for all the people of Glasgow.

Glasgow – in line with rest of the UK – has for decades, pursued an economic model in which sustainable economic growth was argued as the best way to achieve a more equal society. As substantial evidence now demonstrates, this model has not delivered for Glaswegians. Levels of poor health and income inequality are amongst the starkest in the UK. The COVID crisis has made this even more profound. Those who were already vulnerable have borne the brunt of the health crisis in Glasgow and will continue to do so with the economic crisis which will unfold. We simply cannot continue to allow so many people who choose to make this city their home, pay the price for an economic model which is no longer fit for purpose.

A significant and growing body of international evidence (Raworth, 2017; Trebeck 2019; Hickel 2018; European Commission Beyond GDP Project 2018; Living Well within Limits project, University of Leeds) is demonstrating that using economic growth as the main logic from which to organise our societies is incompatible with health and well-being and climate stability. It also articulates credible alternatives. For us, this means that the response to the crisis cannot come from the same thinking which has taken us to this point. We must use this moment to go beyond a return to a broken status quo and instead seek to radically remake this city into a place where all residents can thrive within planetary boundaries. Pioneering examples of how to respond are emerging; Amsterdam is integrating a ‘donut model’ of economics, ecology and well-being into its city plan; Hawaii are adopting a Feminist Economic Recovery plan; Jackson, Mississippi, offers a vision built on co-operatives. Existing good practice highlights the Preston model of using local procurement to benefit the local economy and Havana, twinned with Glasgow, which has successfully pursued an alternative economic model for years. We recognise that there is also much good work already in Glasgow to build from.

Glasgow has an opportunity to position itself at a leading edge of innovation in terms of governance, policy, regulation, participatory democracy, technology, and economy. We can only do this if we are prepared to challenge orthodoxy and act differently.

Further, we note the establishment of separate groups for economic recovery, social recovery and sustainability. This is a siloed response to a systemic issue. As the COVID-19 crisis has made so visible – work, family, community, and our environment are fundamentally interdependent and must be considered as an integrated whole. A systemic approach demands working with these as one whole, so proposed changes in one area can be understood in relationship to impacts in the others.

In addition, and we repeat, as long as the logic of economic growth is our city’s primary driver, as embedded in procurement, planning policy, housing and the type of jobs we create and value – then efforts to address social and environmental concerns will come second to economic growth considerations. This is amply borne out by GCC decisions over preceding years.

Finally, we note that Glasgow City Council (GCC) already has a radical plan to transform the city’s economy to net-zero carbon by 2030. This was drawn up by GCC’s Climate Emergency Working Group in an open and democratic process that included contributions from local grassroots campaign groups: Get Glasgow Moving, Divest Strathclyde and XR Glasgow. The group’s recommendations were approved by GCC on 26 September 2019, with work due to be presented back to GCC’s Environment, Sustainability & Carbon Reduction City Policy Committee on Tuesday 28 April. This meeting was cancelled because of the coronavirus crisis, but the implementation plan should nearly be ready. It must now be published to become the starting point for economic recovery planning.

[ii] Composition and Process

We recognise that the group membership represents considerable and important expertise. However, we highlight that the group composition leans heavily towards a very limited race, class and age demographic, and is not gender balanced. This falls far short of the incredible diversity of Glasgow in 2020. It is not acceptable that the economic future of this city, will only be imagined by an unrepresentative demographic who, despite best intentions and efforts to engage, cannot adequately reflect and understand the variety of lived experience that is needed.

Further, the group represents a form of expertise in the city which is highly professionalised, with largely shared educational and cultural experiences. Such a group is highly likely to be subject to groupthink. This will not only exclude knowledge vital to understanding the issues, but also excludes novel ideas, proposals and solutions which sit outside the bounds of traditional expertise. The validity of resident experience and expertise must be considered as equally as important in a development as significant as this. We point to the Poverty Truth Commission and the Climate Emergency Working Group as example of this understanding.

Most importantly, while we recognise efforts to widen membership and to make it more representative with the late additions of GCVS and Trade Unions, we believe that the use of a representative process is the fundamentally wrong approach for a challenge this significant. This is a moment to catalyse people’s ownership and involvement in what comes next, embedding local democracy into the very fabric of the Glasgow that is becoming.

Comments (22)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Robbie says:

    Love this post good on you,this is the reaction needed across the whole of Scotland,the people are being edged out with absolutely No say, come on people of Glasgow show us the way.

  2. David McGill says:

    High time too.

  3. Josef Ó Luain says:

    The C19 Economic Recovery Group: Another talking-shop consisting of same old faces from the same old dog-eared address book. How dare they!

  4. Shirley Sampson says:

    This is a very encouraging move from Commonweal. Well done.
    We need to encourage ownership by the Glasgow and wider public by circulating and , if necessary, starting a petition to support and implement it.

    1. Thanks Shirley, its not just Commonweal, its a whole alliance if groups

      1. Shirley Sampson says:

        Yes, of course. They’re listed, and it’s good to see so many working together.
        Let’s jus hope it gets the popular discussion and support it deserves.

      1. Kevin Hattie says:

        S.A.N.E sounds like an interesting organisation. I’d be keen to learn more. Is it inspired by the Fearless Cities book?

        1. Sue Laughlin says:

          Yes, Fearless Cities is a core text for us. If you want to get more involved, here’s more info:

          Dear Friends

          Today 14 organisations have written to GCC proposing a radical approach to Glasgow’s future, with citizens in control + and an economy based on need not growth. This letter has come out of Conversations for Change, a series of discussions hosted over the past lockdown weeks jointly by SANE and Enough.

          This continues SANE’s goal of creating spaces for the growth of a “social movement of social movements”, to bring real change in Glasgow.
          If you would like to add your support please send an email to info@sanecollectiveglasgow.org.uk with your name, and any comment you would like to make.

          Please also share with friends.

          There is a link to the letter on our website here

          It would be great if you could forward it to your councillor inviting them to take up the issues raised. Or even better, maybe send the Council your own personal views on how the future needs to be planned and the role you as a Citizen would like to have in that.

          We will talk about how to take this forward at First Sunday, on Zoom, Sunday June 7, 4pm to 5pm. If you would like to take part, register here. By the way, this monthly meet-up has now been going for 4 years – a big achievement! We look forward to getting back to our regular spaces – Glad Cafe & The Space.

          All the best to all SANE’s friends coping with today’s and tomorrow’s challenges.

          1. Kevin Hattie says:

            Cheers, Sue. I’ll have a wee look at the website.

  5. David Oneil says:

    Could start with not shutting Baltic st cleansing ! And moving our hero binmen miles away , In amongst even more men ! Come sense should come before money ! Keep all our depots around city much better service and much safer for all concerned. Surely this is the least the men in Baltic st cleansing deserve ? Must be more ways of saving money than just shutting important depots and then moving all into one place , yours in hope davy oneil oh 42 years in Dalmarnock working so its near to my heart , also one of the last places of work around after all the promises around the games came and people lost there homes , surely saving depot should now be priority ?

  6. Paul Carline says:

    The citizens should be involved as of right – otherwise there’s no real democracy. The Swiss people were able to force a referendum vote on their government’s revised pandemic proposals of 2010. Those against the proposals didn’t ultimately win, but they got 40% of the vote. They forced a national debate and it took six years for the new proposals to come into effect.

    Real democracy.

  7. Wul says:

    Good idea.

    How can people who are expert at extracting wealth for themselves suddenly become useful at re-distributing it?
    As usual, the assumption is that ordinary people don’t understand their own circumstances, or have any ideas worth listening to.

    I am sure there are “consultants” all over the country popping up to advise businesses how to fill their buckets at the Covid-19 money fountain. The cash then be safely stashed away.

  8. Norrie MacPhail says:

    Incredibly well written and argued article. It provides the basis of what Scotland needs to adopt in order to come out of the current covid-19 and political mess we are in now.

    Well done!

  9. Isabel McCue says:

    I firmly agree GCC need to use creative thinking and not just revert back to “what we did before”. Many organisation have been pulling out all the stops to support the vulnerable and families many of them volunteers.
    We all must use this time along with all we have learnt through this pandemic to listen To Really Really listen and act on what needs to be done.
    do not waste money lets have no more conferences about poverty, homelessness etc in fancy places with lovely lunches etc etc. This is a good chance to allow the people of Glasgow to share ideas and solutions. Happy to be part of this movement

    1. Sue Laughlin says:

      Feel free to join us. Get in touch via info@sanecollectiveglasgow.org.uk and/or follow us on Twitter and FB

      1. S.A.N.E are at @SANEGlasgow

  10. michael taplin says:

    bring it on

  11. Seastnan Seastnan says:

    That *statement is vacuous. It’s not actually suggesting anything concrete.

  12. Bob Gillespie says:

    This letter, signed by a wide range of bodies both national and local, should be regarded by Glasgow City Council staff and Councillors as key reading and as the basis for discussions about the “new normal” in the city. Rather than acting on a set of recommendations from a group of people who, in the main, have done very well indeed, and whose representative bodies have done very well indeed, under the current methods of delivering the economy, the Council needs to involve at least as much, if not more, the people whose lives are most greatly impacted by the decisions which be made as a result of those discussions and recommendations: the residents of the city, whose experience of past economic decisions may be very different from those of the people sitting on the planned Post-pandemic Economic Recovery Group. Some of the signatories to this letter – Common Weal and Enough, for example – have produced alternative economic models in which the people’s needs are the focus, not the profit motive, and the city as a whole, rich and poor alike, would benefit from an “All Of Us First” approach to our economic future.

      1. Norrie MacPhail says:

        It strikes me, as an Edinburgh man, that this is a great opportunity for Glasgow to really put itself on the map and tell the Scottish government what the people of Scotland really want – where better? The people do know best and reverting to the same old faces, with their safe homes, pensions and friends in high places, is not the way forward for the country, let alone GCC. The world is in crisis and fundamental change is required to put a halt to the damage that is being done everywhere. Where better to start than a country renowned for innovation and invention when under pressure and specifically in a city with the history to match. Go for it GCC – please, for all of us!

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.